'Palliative-D' Vitamin D to Palliative Cancer Patients (Palliative-D)

September 9, 2020 updated by: Linda Björkhem-Bergman, Region Stockholm

'Palliative-D' Vitamin D Supplementation to Palliative Cancer Patients - A Double Blind, Randomised Controlled Trial

To test the hypothesis that vitamin D treatment during 12 weeks to palliative cancer patients can decrease opioid consumption, fatigue and infectious burden and increase quality of life.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

PROTOCOL IDENTITY AND OBJECTIVES: EudraCT Number 2017-000268-14 Protocol Title: Vitamin D supplementation to palliative cancer patients - A double blind, randomised controlled trial. Acronym: "Palliative-D" Trial Objectives: To test the hypothesis that vitamin D treatment during 12 weeks to palliative cancer patients can decrease opioid consumption, fatigue and infectious burden and increase quality of life.

INVESTIGATIONAL MEDICINAL PRODUCTS (IMP): Test ProductDetremin, MA holder Renapharma; Pharmaceutical Form: Oil Route of Administration: Oral route

METHODOLOGY Trial Design: Double-blind, parallel randomised and placebo controlled trial Dose/Duration 4000 IU/day for 12 weeks

Primary Endpoint:

The decline of opioid-consumption during 12 weeks in the vitamin D group compared to the placebo group, based on 3 measurements with 4 weeks intervals.

Secondary end Points:

  1. Decline in antibiotic consumption
  2. Improvement in quality of life
  3. Improvement in fatigue
  4. Vitamin D levels in serum after 12 weeks
  5. Association between opioid dose and genetic polymorphism in genes involved in the effect and metabolism of vitamin D in the body.

Efficacy Parameters:

Opioid dose, translated to fentanyl per hour measured at baseline and at week 4,8 and 12.

Antibiotic consumption expressed as % of days with antibiotics during the last 4 weeks measured at baseline and at week 4, 8 and 12.

Quality of Life measured with EORTC-QLQ-C15-PAL at baseline and after 12 weeks. Fatigue measured with EORTC-QLQ-C15-PAL at baseline and after 12 weeks. 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels in blood at baseline and after 12 weeks. ESAS (Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale ) measured at baseline and at week 4, 8 and 12.

Safety Parameters: S-calcium will be controlled in all subjects at baseline, at week 4, 8 and 12 and U-calcium in selected cases Power: The least clinically meaningful effect is estimated to be a 20% decline in opioid dose compared to the placebo. To obtain this result with 80% power the number of patients is estimated to be 127 in each arm i.e. 254 patients in total. This includes a drop-out of 25% per group.

Statistical Analyse plan: The primary endpoint will be analysed using linear regression, using bias corrected and accelerated bootstrap confidence intervals, while controlling for baseline measure of opioid dose (similar to ANCOVA). Adjustment for other background variables - such as vitamin D-level at baseline, gender and age - will be made in a secondary analysis to gain efficiency. The continuous secondary endpoints will be analysed using the same method as the primary endpoint .

POPULATION OF TRIAL SUBJECTS Number of Subjects: 254 (127 vitamin D and 127 placebo) Description of Trial Subjects: Palliative Cancer Patients (any cancer form) with a life expectancy of more than 3 months.

TRIAL TIMETABLE First Subject In Aug 2017 Last Subject In Sept 2019 (25 months to include participants) Last Subject Out Dec 2019 End of intervention Dec 2019 End of follow up Dec2019 End of Trial: Dec 2020

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

244

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Stockholm, Sweden, 11219
        • Stockholms Sjukhem ASIH
      • Älvsjö, Sweden, 12559
        • ASIH Stockholm Södra
    • Stockholm
      • Solna, Stockholm, Sweden, 171 54
        • ASIH Stockholm Norr

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients admitted to ASIH Stockholm Södra or Stockholms Sjukhem.
  2. Incurable cancer patients with any type of cancer. They could have ongoing oncological treatment but only with palliative intention. No patients with ongoing oncological treatment with curative intended treated will be included.
  3. The life expectancy should be at least 3 months according to the clinical assessment of the study physician at the screening visit.
  4. The patient should have no cognitive failure, being able to comprehend oral and written information about the study.
  5. 25 OHD < 50 nmol/L.
  6. Men and women aged ≥18
  7. Signed 'informed consent'

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Ongoing vitamin D supplementation at the time for inclusion.
  2. Serum level of 25-OH vitamin D3 >50 nmol/L
  3. Known sarkoidosis
  4. Treatment with tiazides or digoxin or digitoxin
  5. Primary hyperparathyroidism
  6. Hypercalcaemia (verified by a laboratory result younger than 2 month)
  7. Plans to leave the Stockholm county within 12 weeks of inclusion
  8. History of kidney stones
  9. Taking part of another clinical study involving drugs
  10. Hypersensitivity to cholecalciferol and/or any of the excipients
  11. Other criteria that could jeopardize the study or its intention as judged by the investigator
  12. Not being able to perform EORTC-QLQ-C15-PAL or ESAS

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Vitamin D
Cholecalciferol (Detremin) solved in MIGLYOL® 812
To test the hypothesis that vitamin D treatment during 12 weeks to palliative cancer patients is superior to placebo in decreasing opioid consumption, fatigue and infectious burden and increase quality of life.
Other Names:
  • Detremin
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
MIGLYOL® 812
To test the hypothesis that placebo is inferior to vitamin D treatment during 12 weeks to palliative cancer patients in decreasing opioid consumption,
Other Names:
  • MIGLYOL® 812

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in opioid dose during 12 weeks
Time Frame: 12 weeks
The change in decline of opioid-consumption during 12 weeks in the vitamin D group compared to the placebo group, based on 4 measurements with 4 weeks intervals.
12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Antibiotic Consumption during 12 weeks
Time Frame: 12weeks
Change in Antibiotic consumption expressed as % of days with antibiotics during the last 4 weeks measured at baseline and at week 4, 8 and 12.
12weeks
Change in Quality of life after 12 weeks
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Change in Quality of Life measured with EORTC-QLQ-C15-PAL at baseline and after 12 weeks.
12 weeks
Change in Fatigue after12 weeks
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Change in Fatigue measured with EORTC-QLQ-C15-PAL at baseline and after 12 weeks.
12 weeks
Change in 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels after 12 weeks
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Change in 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels in blood at baseline and after 12 weeks.
12 weeks
Change in Symptom burden during 12 weeks
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Change in Symptom burden measured with ESAS (Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale) at baseline and at week 4, 8 and 12.
12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Linda Björkhem-Bergman, Assoc Prof, Stockholm Läns Landsting

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 9, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

June 9, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 17, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 30, 2017

First Posted (Estimate)

January 31, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 11, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 9, 2020

Last Verified

September 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Vitamin D Deficiency

Clinical Trials on Cholecalciferol

3
Subscribe