Evaluating Adult Patient Temperatures During Lower Spinal Surgery

May 3, 2018 updated by: Jean M. Guyer, Mayo Clinic

Comparing Patient Temperatures in Adults During Lower Spinal Surgery Using Either a Heated Ventilator Circuit or a Standard Ventilator Circuit With a Heat-Moisture Exchanger

The purpose of this study is to evaluate patients' temperatures after using one of two ventilator circuits (breathing systems): the ANAPOD™ Heat and Humidification System (ANAPOD™ system) or the standard ventilator circuit with a heat-moisture exchanger (standard ventilator). The ANAPOD™ system will provide additional heat and humidity to patients through their breathing tube while the standard ventilator will not. The investigators are doing this research study to find out if the ventilator circuit providing additional heat and humidity will keep patients warmer during surgery and after surgery.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Patients were randomly assigned to either the treatment group or the control group prior to surgery. Prior to induction, patients in the control group were given inspiratory gas at ambient air temperature (20-22 degrees Celsius) and patients in the treatment group were given inspiratory gas at warmed temperatures (40-41 degrees Celsius). All patients were induced with general anesthesia in the supine position and repositioned prone following endotracheal intubation and placement of an esophageal stethoscope with a temperature sensor, as per usual hospital practice. Esophageal temperatures were recorded within 30 minutes of the baseline esophageal temperature and every 10 minutes thereafter for the first hour post-induction. All patients had a blanket and forced air warming applied to their lower extremities and upper back at 43 degrees Celsius after draping. All patients had esophageal temperature measurements recorded every 30 minutes until the patient was repositioned supine. Core temperatures were recorded four hours post-induction for those patients reaching that timeframe.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

70

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Elective spine surgery anticipated greater than three hours in duration
  • Posterior approach
  • An operative site between lumbar one and sacral one
  • Involving two or more levels with fusion and/or instrumentation and/or revisions
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Status of I-III

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with a tracheostomy
  • Preoperative temperature >38°C or <36°C on the day of surgery
  • Active infection or erythema to the back
  • White blood cell count greater than 10,500/microliter (mcL)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Heated Ventilator Circuit
Heated and humidified inspired gases using the ANAPOD™ Heat and Humidification System (Westmed; Tucson, Arizona, USA) circuit prior to induction of general anesthesia in addition to standard ventilation and temperature management.
active heat and humidification during anesthesia by warming inspire gases without a heat-moisture exchanger
Other Names:
  • ANAPOD™ Heat and Humidification System
Active Comparator: Standard Ventilator Circuit
Standard ventilation and temperature management.
no active heat and humidification during anesthesia
Other Names:
  • Thermovent 600; Portex

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Core Body Temperature
Time Frame: Approximately four hours post-induction of general anesthesia (or last recorded temperature)
Core body temperature will be taken in the esophagus. The last recorded esophageal temperature will be used for surgeries not reaching 3 hours duration.
Approximately four hours post-induction of general anesthesia (or last recorded temperature)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Intraoperative Core Temperatures Post-induction
Time Frame: Approximately 30 minutes, 60 minutes, 120 minutes post-induction of general anesthesia
Core body temperature will be taken in the esophagus after general anesthesia induction.
Approximately 30 minutes, 60 minutes, 120 minutes post-induction of general anesthesia
Number of Subjects With Post-operative Shivering
Time Frame: Approximately 2 hours after completion of the surgery
Shivering in the post-anesthesia care unit will be assessed using the Bedside Shivering Assessment Scale. This is a 4 point scale and rate shivering as the following: absent, mild, moderate, or severe. Only the highest degree of patient shivering was used in the analysis.
Approximately 2 hours after completion of the surgery
Hospital Length of Stay
Time Frame: Surgery to hospital discharge
Number of days in the hospital
Surgery to hospital discharge
Overall Post-operative Temperature
Time Frame: PACU arrival
Temperature at Post Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) arrival.
PACU arrival
Number of Participants With Transfusion Within 48 Hours of Surgery
Time Frame: Within 48 hours of surgery
Requirement of blood transfusion within 48 hours of surgery
Within 48 hours of surgery
Estimated Blood Loss
Time Frame: duration of surgery
The estimated blood loss per case was determined by the anesthesia provider by measuring the volume of blood in the suction canister while taking into account the amount of irrigation solution used.
duration of surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jean M Guyer, DNP, Mayo Clinic

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 28, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 5, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

February 5, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 9, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 9, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

February 13, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 7, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 3, 2018

Last Verified

May 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 15-001604
  • UL1TR000135 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hypothermia

Clinical Trials on Heated Ventilator Circuit

Subscribe