Influence of Respiratory Gases Conditioning on Aerosol Delivery During Invasive Ventilation (Aerovent-)

Influence of Respiratory Gases Conditioning on Aerosol Delivery During Invasive Ventilation: a Randomized Comparative Scintigraphic Study

The intention is to enroll a specific sample of intubated patients. To compare the effect of respiratory gas conditioning on lung deposition and considering the well-known influences of lung pathology on lung deposition, intubated patients with healthy lungs will be included. Postoperative neurosurgery ventilated patients respond perfectly to this criteria. A previous study including 17 postoperative neurosurgery patients was performed in 2013 with a perfect collaboration between the ICU and the Department of Neurosurgery and Anesthesiology.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

34

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bruxelles, Belgium, 1200
        • Cliniques Universiataires Saint-Luc

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged 18 years or older
  • Postoperative neurosurgery intubated patients admitted for brain neurosurgery in the ICU (Intensive care neuro-traumatologic and Toxicologic)- With a healthy lung function.
  • Signed and dated informed consent should be obtained in accordance of local regulations.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Spine neurosurgery
  • History of cardiovascular and pulmonary disease
  • Extubation immediately after surgery
  • Modification of the allocated humidification technique before or during the nebulization (heated-humidifier deficiency or safety concern)
  • Inaccurate quantification of aerosol deposition (i.e., artifacts or overlap of tracheal and pulmonary deposition).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Heated-humidifier left on during nebulization
Aerosol particles are generated by a vibrating-mesh nebulizer specifically designed for mechanical ventilation
It will be left on during the transfer and the nebulization in group 1
It will be turned off 30 minutes before the nebulization (nebulization ended max 45 minutes after turning off the heated-humidifier).
Active Comparator: Heated-humidifier turned off 30 minutes before nebulization
Aerosol particles are generated by a vibrating-mesh nebulizer specifically designed for mechanical ventilation
It will be left on during the transfer and the nebulization in group 1
It will be turned off 30 minutes before the nebulization (nebulization ended max 45 minutes after turning off the heated-humidifier).
Active Comparator: Use of a heat and moisture exchanger (HME) filter
Aerosol particles are generated by a vibrating-mesh nebulizer specifically designed for mechanical ventilation
The nebulizer is placed between the filter and the endotracheal tube.
Active Comparator: Use of a dry ventilator circuit specific for aerosol therapy
Aerosol particles are generated by a vibrating-mesh nebulizer specifically designed for mechanical ventilation
Streamlined components, specific position for the nebulizer at 30 cm of a V-shaped Y piece

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quantity of aerosol deposition from the nebulizer reservoir to the subject. Measured by Planar scintigraphy.
Time Frame: 45 minutes
% of the nominal dose.
45 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Pierre-François Laterre, MD, PhD, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-luc

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 22, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 15, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

December 15, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 4, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 12, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

March 13, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 4, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 2, 2022

Last Verified

November 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Brain Injuries, Traumatic

Clinical Trials on Aerogen Solo®

Subscribe