Cognate Patient Care Insight Scale (EIPSP)

April 19, 2019 updated by: Hôpital le Vinatier

Pilot Study of a New Insight Assessment Tool

Schizophrenia is a disease of young adults that affects 1% of the general population. According to numerous studies, it has been estimated that between 50% and 80% of patients with schizophrenia do not consider to have a mental disorder and are therefore not aware of their disorders. A poor degree of insight is associated with poor compliance, a higher number of re-hospitalizations, altered social and relational functioning, and a higher number of suicides and violent behaviors. This is why insight, which is an essential dimension of psychopathology, must be evaluated, as it depends to a large extent on the therapeutic alliance, adherence to treatment, likelihood of relapse and prognosis.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Evaluation (test, re-test) This new tool for assessing insight will allow for a discrepancy in assessment and a more refined assessment with a view to developing specific care for the patient and / or the relative with regard to the three dimensions Evaluated: disease, treatment and functional implications

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bron Cedex, France, 69678
        • Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 50 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of schizophrenia
  • Age from 18 to 50 years old
  • Stabilized clinical condition (without therapeutic modification during the month prior to inclusion)
  • French language read, spoken and understood (patient and family member)
  • Having given his consent
  • Agreement of the guardian for persons under guardianship
  • Consent of the relative

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Refusal of patient or legal guardian
  • Refusal of the loved one
  • Patient and / or neurological disorder of neurological origin of vascular, infectious or neurodegenerative origin

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: patients with schizophrenia and their designated relatives
Evaluation of the patient's insight (an inclusion phase, followed by two evaluation phases on D0 and D7) by the patient, his / her close and two caregivers (inter-judicial fidelity)

This study will evaluate the insight of the patient, something carried out in common practice within the Eastern Pole (CH Le Vinatier). This assessment will take place in the specific services where patients are cared for. It will make it possible to evaluate insight more closely by comparing the opinions of the three actors. There is no risk in this study.

The study will be carried out over 2 years with a recruitment of 119 patients responding to the diagnosis of schizophrenia, taken care of within the Eastern Pole (Intra and Extrahospital services).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Concurrent validity of the hetero-evaluation scale by studying its correlation with the results obtained, for the same persons, on the SUMD scale (Scale to Assess Unawareness of Mental Disorder)
Time Frame: two years
Correlation higher than 0.40 in the Bravais-Pearson test between the caregiver's hetero-evaluation scale and the Scale to Assess Understanding of Mental Disorder (SUMD)
two years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Correlation greater than 0.40 to inter-judge fidelity to Cohen's Kappa test
Time Frame: two years

Inter-judicial fidelity will be measured with Cohen's Kappa test, which is a coefficient to measure the agreement between two qualitative variables with the same modalities. Conventionally, it is used to measure the degree of concordance between the stages Awarded by two judges. It can also be applied to measure an intra-observer agreement.

The closer the ratio is to 1, the closer the gap between the observed chord proportion and the theoretical proportion of "random" chords approaches the gap between the perfect tuning of the two observers and their random match. The coefficient is always between -1 and 1 (maximum agreement).

two years
Cronbach's alpha coefficient with a value of 0.7 measuring internal consistency
Time Frame: two years

Internal consistency will be measured with the Cronbach alpha coefficient, sometimes referred to simply as the coefficient.

Which is a statistic used especially in psychometrics to measure the internal consistency (or reliability) of the questions asked during a test (the answers to the questions on the same subject to be correlated). Its value is between 0 and 1, being considered "acceptable" from 0.7. It therefore allows estimation of the fidelity of the score to a test.

two years
Correlation greater than 0.40 at the Bravais-Pearson test measuring test fidelity, re-testing
Time Frame: two years
This coefficient makes it possible to detect the presence or absence of a linear relationship between two continuous quantitative characters. To calculate this coefficient, one must first calculate the covariance. Covariance is the mean of the product of deviations from the mean. The linear correlation coefficient of two characters X and Y is equal to the covariance of X and Y divided by the product of the standard deviations of X and Y. It can be shown that this coefficient varies between -1 and +1
two years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: MAGES Nicolas, MDPH, Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

January 2, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

January 2, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

April 2, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 28, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 2, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

March 7, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 22, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 19, 2019

Last Verified

April 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2016-A01716-45

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Schizophrenia

Clinical Trials on Assessment of the insight of schizophrenic patients by themselves, their relatives and caregivers

Subscribe