IMPLEMENT - Model Project for Quality-assured Exercise Therapy for Cancer Patients

August 21, 2024 updated by: Freerk Baumann; Prof. Dr., University of Cologne

IMPLEMENT - Model Project for the Cross-sector Implementation of a Comprehensive and Quality-assured Sports and Exercise Therapy for Cancer Patients

IMPLEMENT aims to develop, test and establish a sustainable access structure for quality-assured oncological exercise therapy (qOET) in Germany as a model within the funding period of three years. This will be done in three phases:

Phase 1: In the first step, a characterization of the existing implementation structures and the existing barriers and needs as well as the establishment of the cooperation with the most important actors in the care system will take place.

Phase 2: In the subsequent implementation process, concrete measures are practically implemented in subprojects for specific target groups (children/adolescents, adults) and specific regions (rural, urban) as well as the digital solutions and interface management. With the help of a mixed-methods design, the barriers and facilitating factors of the implementation of area-wide qSBT will be investigated during the project and fed into a "learning system" for adaptation and improvement.

Phase 3: The success of the measures to increase patient participation in qOET and the development of the structures as well as the barrier and facilitating factors for an effective implementation will be addressed in a before-after comparison through evaluation steps and an economic accompanying evaluation will be carried out.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

IMPLEMENT is an exploratory, open-label, non-randomized, mixed-methods study. No additional treatments or therapies that can influence the course of the disease are provided to the participating patients. Rather, various implementation strategies will be developed to bring more patients into the existing quality-assures oncological exercise therapy (qOET), to further develop other exercise and sports offers for qOET or to create completely new offers of qOET. The implementation strategies are examined with regard to their degree of effectiveness. The effectiveness is determined by means of a before-and-after comparison (e.g. number of patients in qOET at baseline) and, if applicable, with comparable studies. IMPLEMENT is evaluated using the RE-AIM framework. The aim of the data collection carried out in IMPLEMENT is to provide the necessary data for the evaluation with RE-AIM on the one hand, and to provide information for the development and adaptation of suitable implementation strategies on the other.

Risks to achieving the objectives include the willingness of patients to participate in qOET and the willingness of doctors, therapists and other people working in oncological care to implement the interventions and to expand and adapt their professional activities accordingly. To address these challenges, a mixed-methods approach is used to identify barriers and facilitators. A mixed-methods approach enables a theoretical understanding of the implementation process and provides a more comprehensive picture of the factors relevant to successful implementation than qualitative or exclusively quantitative methods alone.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

600

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with cancer
  • Healthcare providers (e.g. Medical Doctors, physiotherapists, nurses, psychologists) involved in the treatment and/or counseling of cancer patients, including aftercare.

Exclusion Criteria (Cancer Patients):

  • Psychological and/or physical limitations that do not allow participation in quality-assured sports and exercise therapy (e.g. unstable cardiac arrhythmias)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Cancer Patients and Parents of Cancer Patients
Children: Age 5-12 years Parents of children with cancer Teenager: Age 13-17 years Parents of teenager with cancer AYAs: Adolescence and young adults: Age 18-39 years Adults: > 40 years
The study population will be surveyed at 3 yearly measurement time points by means of questionnaires and interviews on attitudes, barrier and support factors for participation in exercise therapy.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Primary Outcome: Increase oncology patients participating in quality-assured exercise therapy
Time Frame: Baseline (M1), one year (M2) and 2 years (M3)
The primary outcome of the IMPLEMENT project is an increase in the number of oncology patients participating in quality-assured sports and exercise therapy (median 30%). The primary outcome is measured by the RE-AIM (Reach) questionnaire in a semi-structured personal interview three times.
Baseline (M1), one year (M2) and 2 years (M3)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
SO1. Adoption/acceptance
Time Frame: Baseline (M1), one year (M2) and 2 years (M3)

Indicator: Other IMPLEMENT locations or institutions offer quality-assured exercise therapy.

Indicator: The existing quality-assured exercise therapy service is offered to other oncology patient groups.

These outcomes are measured using the RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance) questionnaire in a semi-structured personal interview three times. We report the overall numbers, higher is better.

Baseline (M1), one year (M2) and 2 years (M3)
SO2. Patient-related effectiveness
Time Frame: Baseline (M1), one year (M2) and 2 years (M3)

Indicator: Proportion of patients who report a positive impact of exercise therapy on their daily lives (increase of 25% over the course of the project).

Patient-related effectiveness is measured using the quality of life questionnaires (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) for adults and Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory™ Version 4.0. (PedsQL™ 4.0) for children and adolescents. The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30 item instrument meant to assess some of the different aspects that define the quality of life of cancer patients. The 23-item PedsQL™ 4.0 measures health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in children and adolescents across multiple dimensions, including physical, emotional, social, and school functioning. Results will be transformed into scores on a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better HRQoL.

Baseline (M1), one year (M2) and 2 years (M3)
SO3. Consistency of implementation
Time Frame: Baseline (M1), one year (M2) and 2 years (M3)

Indicator: At all IMPLEMENT locations and institutions, a) participation in the standardized IMPLEMENT further education and training program is offered at the IMPLEMENT location in Cologne (face-to-face or online) and b) if the institution offers quality-assured exercise therapy, the standardized further education and training program is taken up by at least 50% of the therapists working in quality-assured exercise therapy.

Indicator: At all institutions that offer quality-assured exercise therapy, at least 80% of patients are informed about the offer.

These outcomes are measured using the RE-AIM (Consistency of implementation) questionnaire in a semi-structured personal interview three times. We report proportions, 0-100%, higher is better.

Baseline (M1), one year (M2) and 2 years (M3)
SO4. Maintenance
Time Frame: Baseline (M1), one year (M2) and 2 years (M3)

Indicator: Quality-assured exercise therapy can be offered beyond the course of the project at all IMPLEMENT locations and institutions that started quality-assured exercise therapy during the course of the project.

Indicator: Information on financing models (e.g. with health insurance companies) from all IMPLEMENT locations and institutions has been summarized centrally in IMPLEMENT and is included in the recommendations for the sustainable implementation of quality-assured exercise therapy.

These outcomes are measured using the RE-AIM (Maintenance) questionnaire in a semi-structured personal interview three times. We report proportions, 0-100%, higher is better.

Baseline (M1), one year (M2) and 2 years (M3)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Freerk Baumann, Prof. Dr., University of Cologne
  • Principal Investigator: Michael Leitzmann, Prof.Dr.Dr., University of Regensburg
  • Principal Investigator: Hajo Zeeb, Prof. Dr., Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS GmbH

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 30, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 28, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 22, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 3, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

July 11, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 23, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 21, 2024

Last Verified

August 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • UCologne 70114696

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cancer

Clinical Trials on Cancer Patients; Institutions and their employees in the treatment and/or counseling of cancer patients

Subscribe