Can Surface Roughness Predict Progression of Tooth Wear?

June 5, 2017 updated by: King's College London

Can Surface Roughness Predict Progression of Tooth Wear in Participants With Dietary Origins of Acid?

The clinical study was a single-blind, randomised intervention study to measure surface changes of polished and unpolished enamel in situ following an orange juice acid challenge. Ethical approval for the study was granted by the Stanmore Health Research Authority REC ref 15/LO/0417, and the study was conducted per the guidelines for Good Clinical Practice. The study investigated a total 6 erosion regimes divided in 3 different erosion times plus ex vivo immersion in orange juice drink versus in vivo rinsing of the same orange juice drink.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

60 unpolished and 60 polished enamel samples were prepared from extracted human molars collected under ethical approval.

30 healthy volunteers were recruited and lower dental impressions were recorded using standard stock trays. Custom made lower orthoodontic type appliances were made by the laboratory to accommodate a total of four enamel (2 left and right hand side) samples positioned buccally in the premolar/molar region.

The volunteers were randomly allocated into one of 3 groups: 5 mins erosion repeated x3, 10 mins erosion repeated x3 or 15 mins erosion repeated x3 and a coin was flipped to determine which side the samples were to be removed for ex vivo immersion with tails for left and heads for right. . At the beginning of the study visit the splints were inserted and worn for 30 minutes. Following which the enamel samples (1 polished and 1 unpolished) were removed from one side to begin the erosion regime. For in vivo erosion each participant was asked to rinse with orange juice for their either time 5, 10 or 15 minutes. This was standardised by setting up cups with 10 mL of the orange juice and a timer set at 1 minute. The participant was asked to insert the liquid into their mouths start the time and when the alarm sounded expectorate and repeat until they completed his/her time allocation of either 5, 10 or 15 minutes. Simultaneously the ex vivo samples were immersed in 20 mL of orange juice and agitated at 62 rpm for the allocated time using an orbital shaker (Stuart Scientific, Mini Orbital Shaker S05, Bibby). This completed one cycle after which the removed samples were reinserted into the splint which was worn for a further hour after which the rinsing/immersion regime was repeated. The process was repeated a further instance to complete 3 cycles of erosion. After the 3rd and final erosion cycle the participants were given a desensitising toothpaste Sensodyne Repair & Protect (GSK, Weybridge, UK).

The unpolished enamel samples were analysed before and after the experiment to measure changes in surface texture. Whereas, the polished samples were analysed for surface texture, hardness change and tissue loss.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • mild erosive tooth wear maximum score of 2 in each sextant and cumulative score no more than 8, aged 18 years and over, willing to participate, not enrolled in any other research, more than 20 anterior and posterior teeth, no active carious lesions and a maximum BPE score of 2 in one sextant (no periodontal disease).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • pregnancy or breast feeding, medical history likely to impact on attendance or mobility, insulin dependent diabetes, saliva diagnoses (xerostomia), lower orthodontic appliances, dentine hypersensitivity, defective restoration of the occlusal or incisal surfaces of upper anterior teeth and first molars and any condition that precluded consumption of 300 ml of orange juice a day for 5 consecutive days.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 15 minutes' erosion
Orange juice is administered ex vivo and in vivo for 5 minutes and repeated a total of 3 times
3 immersion times in orange juice were investigated
Experimental: 30 minutes' erosion
Orange juice is administered ex vivo and in vivo for 10 minutes and repeated a total of 3 times
3 immersion times in orange juice were investigated
Experimental: 45 minutes' erosion
Orange juice is administered ex vivo and in vivo for 15 minutes and repeated a total of 3 times
3 immersion times in orange juice were investigated

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Microhardness (KHN)
Time Frame: 12 weeks
To measure microhardness of enamel samples using a microhardness tester before and after the intervention. The units will be KHN
12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Surface roughness
Time Frame: 12 weeks
To measure surface roughness of enamel samples using anon contact profilometer before and after the intervention. The units will be microns.
12 weeks
Step height loss
Time Frame: 12 weeks
To measure step height loss of enamel samples following the intervention using a non contact profilometer. The units will be microns.
12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 10, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 29, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

May 29, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 30, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 5, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

June 7, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 7, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 5, 2017

Last Verified

May 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 15/LO/0417

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Tooth Wear

Clinical Trials on Orange juice

3
Subscribe