Effects of Beverages Containing Orange or Apple Pomace on Digestive Health in Adults

December 17, 2019 updated by: PepsiCo Global R&D

The Effect of Orange or Apple Pomace on Digestive Health in Adults: a Randomized, Double Blind, Controlled Trial

This is a randomized crossover intervention designed to evaluate effects of daily intake of beverages containing orange or apple Pomace on gastrointestinal function as measured by stool frequency. Additional outcomes will include aspects of digestive health and self-reported GI symptoms and dietary intake as well as analysis of gut microbiota.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

90

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Illinois
      • Addison, Illinois, United States, 60101
        • Biofortis

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Healthy males and females 18-60 years old
  • Willing and able to consume 16 oz. of orange or apple beverage per day for 4 week periods
  • Willing to maintain usual diet, smoking status, physical activity pattern, supplements and meds

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Food allergies or sensitivities to ingredients in study beverages
  • Presence or history of GI condition, endocrine (including diabetes), cardiovascular disease or other disease or condition that could interfere in the interpretation of the study results in the opinion of the Investigator.
  • Extreme dietary habits including vegetarian, vegan or Atkins diet
  • Females or are pregnant, planning to become pregnant or breast feeding during the study period.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: BASIC_SCIENCE
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: CROSSOVER
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Orange juice only
16 oz. orange juice per day for 4 weeks
16 oz. orange juice per day for 4 weeks
EXPERIMENTAL: orange juice + orange Pomace
16 oz. orange juice + orange Pomace per day for 4 weeks
16 oz. orange juice + orange Pomace per day for 4 weeks
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Apple juice only
16 oz. apple juice per day for 4 weeks
16 oz. apple juice per day for 4 weeks
EXPERIMENTAL: Apple Juice + Apple Pomace
16 oz. apple juice + apple Pomace per day for 4 weeks
16 oz. apple juice and apple Pomace per day for 4 weeks

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
stool frequency
Time Frame: Changes over 7 weeks (daily during 4 week treatment followed by daily during 3 week washout) compared to baseline (daily during 2 week run-in)
Bowel habits daily diary as weekly averages. Fewer days with no stool, and higher number of stools per week would be better.
Changes over 7 weeks (daily during 4 week treatment followed by daily during 3 week washout) compared to baseline (daily during 2 week run-in)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Self-reported GI symptoms
Time Frame: Changes over 7 weeks (daily during 4 week treatment followed by daily during 3 week washout) compared to baseline (daily during 2 week run-in)
GI Tolerability questionnaire, 4 selections. The minimum value is Less than usual. The maximum value is Much more than usual. Pomace treament arms expected to have more GI symptoms than juice arms. Less symptoms are better than more.
Changes over 7 weeks (daily during 4 week treatment followed by daily during 3 week washout) compared to baseline (daily during 2 week run-in)
Stool consistency
Time Frame: Changes over 7 weeks (daily during 4 week treatment followed by daily during 3 week washout) compared to baseline (daily during 2 week run-in)
Bristol score, 7 types of stool drawings presented in a chart from lumpy Type 1, to watery Type 7. Improved consistency would be better.
Changes over 7 weeks (daily during 4 week treatment followed by daily during 3 week washout) compared to baseline (daily during 2 week run-in)
Ease of stool passage
Time Frame: Changes over 7 weeks (daily during 4 week treatment followed by daily during 3 week washout) compared to baseline (daily during 2 week run-in)
Rating scale 1 (Very easy) to 5 (Very difficult). Easier passage would be better.
Changes over 7 weeks (daily during 4 week treatment followed by daily during 3 week washout) compared to baseline (daily during 2 week run-in)
microbiota changes
Time Frame: Changes from baseline sample to end of treatment sample (Week 4) and end of 3 week washout sample (Week 7)
Stool samples for possible explanations of mechanisms of pomace. Higher bacteria associated with fiber fermentation would be better. Species examined include F. Prau, lachnospiraceae, ruminoucoccaceae, bifidobacteria, and changes in alpha and beta diversity as measured by 16S RNA sequencing. Data pending, unknown units at this time.
Changes from baseline sample to end of treatment sample (Week 4) and end of 3 week washout sample (Week 7)
Dietary analysis
Time Frame: Changes from 2 week run in (baseline) to the last week of treatment (Week 4) and the last week of 3 week washout (Week 7)
3-day diet record. Expecting higher daily fiber intake for pomace arms.
Changes from 2 week run in (baseline) to the last week of treatment (Week 4) and the last week of 3 week washout (Week 7)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kathleen Kelley, MD, Biofortis

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

October 15, 2018

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

August 30, 2019

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

August 30, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 19, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 19, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

November 21, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

December 20, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 17, 2019

Last Verified

December 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PEP-1805

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Digestive Health

Clinical Trials on Orange Juice

Subscribe