- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03749031
Effects of Beverages Containing Orange or Apple Pomace on Digestive Health in Adults
December 17, 2019 updated by: PepsiCo Global R&D
The Effect of Orange or Apple Pomace on Digestive Health in Adults: a Randomized, Double Blind, Controlled Trial
This is a randomized crossover intervention designed to evaluate effects of daily intake of beverages containing orange or apple Pomace on gastrointestinal function as measured by stool frequency.
Additional outcomes will include aspects of digestive health and self-reported GI symptoms and dietary intake as well as analysis of gut microbiota.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
90
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Illinois
-
Addison, Illinois, United States, 60101
- Biofortis
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 60 years (ADULT)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Healthy males and females 18-60 years old
- Willing and able to consume 16 oz. of orange or apple beverage per day for 4 week periods
- Willing to maintain usual diet, smoking status, physical activity pattern, supplements and meds
Exclusion Criteria:
- Food allergies or sensitivities to ingredients in study beverages
- Presence or history of GI condition, endocrine (including diabetes), cardiovascular disease or other disease or condition that could interfere in the interpretation of the study results in the opinion of the Investigator.
- Extreme dietary habits including vegetarian, vegan or Atkins diet
- Females or are pregnant, planning to become pregnant or breast feeding during the study period.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: BASIC_SCIENCE
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: CROSSOVER
- Masking: DOUBLE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Orange juice only
16 oz.
orange juice per day for 4 weeks
|
16 oz.
orange juice per day for 4 weeks
|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: orange juice + orange Pomace
16 oz.
orange juice + orange Pomace per day for 4 weeks
|
16 oz.
orange juice + orange Pomace per day for 4 weeks
|
|
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Apple juice only
16 oz.
apple juice per day for 4 weeks
|
16 oz.
apple juice per day for 4 weeks
|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Apple Juice + Apple Pomace
16 oz.
apple juice + apple Pomace per day for 4 weeks
|
16 oz.
apple juice and apple Pomace per day for 4 weeks
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
stool frequency
Time Frame: Changes over 7 weeks (daily during 4 week treatment followed by daily during 3 week washout) compared to baseline (daily during 2 week run-in)
|
Bowel habits daily diary as weekly averages.
Fewer days with no stool, and higher number of stools per week would be better.
|
Changes over 7 weeks (daily during 4 week treatment followed by daily during 3 week washout) compared to baseline (daily during 2 week run-in)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Self-reported GI symptoms
Time Frame: Changes over 7 weeks (daily during 4 week treatment followed by daily during 3 week washout) compared to baseline (daily during 2 week run-in)
|
GI Tolerability questionnaire, 4 selections.
The minimum value is Less than usual.
The maximum value is Much more than usual.
Pomace treament arms expected to have more GI symptoms than juice arms.
Less symptoms are better than more.
|
Changes over 7 weeks (daily during 4 week treatment followed by daily during 3 week washout) compared to baseline (daily during 2 week run-in)
|
|
Stool consistency
Time Frame: Changes over 7 weeks (daily during 4 week treatment followed by daily during 3 week washout) compared to baseline (daily during 2 week run-in)
|
Bristol score, 7 types of stool drawings presented in a chart from lumpy Type 1, to watery Type 7. Improved consistency would be better.
|
Changes over 7 weeks (daily during 4 week treatment followed by daily during 3 week washout) compared to baseline (daily during 2 week run-in)
|
|
Ease of stool passage
Time Frame: Changes over 7 weeks (daily during 4 week treatment followed by daily during 3 week washout) compared to baseline (daily during 2 week run-in)
|
Rating scale 1 (Very easy) to 5 (Very difficult).
Easier passage would be better.
|
Changes over 7 weeks (daily during 4 week treatment followed by daily during 3 week washout) compared to baseline (daily during 2 week run-in)
|
|
microbiota changes
Time Frame: Changes from baseline sample to end of treatment sample (Week 4) and end of 3 week washout sample (Week 7)
|
Stool samples for possible explanations of mechanisms of pomace.
Higher bacteria associated with fiber fermentation would be better.
Species examined include F. Prau, lachnospiraceae, ruminoucoccaceae, bifidobacteria, and changes in alpha and beta diversity as measured by 16S RNA sequencing.
Data pending, unknown units at this time.
|
Changes from baseline sample to end of treatment sample (Week 4) and end of 3 week washout sample (Week 7)
|
|
Dietary analysis
Time Frame: Changes from 2 week run in (baseline) to the last week of treatment (Week 4) and the last week of 3 week washout (Week 7)
|
3-day diet record.
Expecting higher daily fiber intake for pomace arms.
|
Changes from 2 week run in (baseline) to the last week of treatment (Week 4) and the last week of 3 week washout (Week 7)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Kathleen Kelley, MD, Biofortis
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
October 15, 2018
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
August 30, 2019
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
August 30, 2019
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
November 19, 2018
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
November 19, 2018
First Posted (ACTUAL)
November 21, 2018
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
December 20, 2019
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
December 17, 2019
Last Verified
December 1, 2019
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- PEP-1805
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Digestive Health
-
BIO-CAT Microbials, LLCBiofortis Clinical Research, Inc.CompletedImmune Health | Cardiovascular Health | Gastrointestinal Health | Digestive HealthUnited States
-
BIO-CAT Microbials, LLCOhio State University; Biofortis Clinical Research, Inc.CompletedImmune Health | Gastrointestinal Health | Digestive HealthUnited States
-
University of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignBIO-CAT, Inc.CompletedGastrointestinal Health | Digestive HealthUnited States
-
McGill UniversityBIO-CAT, Inc.RecruitingGastrointestinal Health | Digestive HealthCanada
-
BIO-CAT, Inc.Nutrasource Pharmaceutical and Nutraceutical Services, Inc.CompletedGastrointestinal Health | Digestive HealthCanada
-
One Bio Inc.People Science, Inc.CompletedMetabolic Health | Digestive HealthUnited States
-
SF Research Institute, Inc.Life VantageRecruitingGastrointestinal Symptoms | Gut Health | Digestive HealthUnited States
-
BIO-CAT, Inc.McGill UniversityCompletedAppetitive Behavior | Gastrointestinal Health | Digestive HealthCanada
-
Love WellnessCitruslabsCompletedDigestion | Digestive HealthUnited States
-
The Archer-Daniels-Midland CompanyUniversity of North Texas, Denton, TXTerminatedGastrointestinal Health | DigestiveUnited States
Clinical Trials on Orange Juice
-
María-Teresa García-ConesaUniversidad Católica San Antonio de MurciaCompleted
-
PepsiCo Global R&DCompletedGlycemic ResponseUnited States
-
Loma Linda UniversityCompletedBlood PressureUnited States
-
University of ReadingCompleted
-
Quadram Institute BioscienceBiotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council; European CommissionCompleted
-
Hasselt UniversityHochschule Geisenheim UniversityCompleted
-
TNOCompletedInflammation | Alcohol ConsumptionNetherlands
-
University of HohenheimCompleted
-
Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyCompleted
-
University of Nevada, RenoUnited States Department of Agriculture (USDA); Sierra Nevada Nephrology Consultants...CompletedHyperkalemia | Chronic Kidney Disease Requiring Chronic DialysisUnited States