Enamel Wear Evaluation in Patients With Different Ceramic Restorations

May 31, 2022 updated by: University of Valencia

Wear Evaluation of Antagonist Enamel to Monolithic Zirconia, Lithium Disilicate and Metal-ceramic Restorations. Prospective Randomised Study

The aim of this study is to evaluate the wear produced in the short and medium term by monolithic zirconia, metal-ceramic and lithium disilicate restorations on the antagonist natural enamel in patients with fixed prostheses, assessing the factors that may influence this wear.

The investigators will also analyse whether the wear of the tooth antagonistic to the different restorations differs significantly with respect to the wear of the natural tooth (control group). The null hypothesis is that there are no significant differences.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The study will be carried out on patients who will be candidates for treatment with full coverage restorations on teeth (single crowns). These crowns will be made of one of the following materials: monolithic zirconia, lithium disilicate or metal-ceramic, which will be cemented according to the guidelines defined in the scientific literature.

Inclusion criteria will be: patients in need of full coverage crowns on a first or second premolar or first or second molar in any arch, over 18 years of age, no contraindications for dental treatment, good oral hygiene, no periodontal disease or treated periodontal disease, absence of temporomandibular disorder and/or untreated habits or parafunctions.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the wear produced in the short and medium term by monolithic zirconia, metal-ceramic and lithium disilicate restorations on the antagonist tooth in patients with fixed prostheses, assessing the factors that may influence this wear.

The investigators will also analyse whether the wear of the tooth antagonistic to the different restorations differs significantly with respect to the wear of the natural tooth (control group). The null hypothesis is that there are no significant differences.

Once the treatment has been completed, the patient must attend routine check-ups in which a complete intraoral exploration, a scan and data collection for both arches will be carried out in order to analyse the following variables: wear of the antagonist tooth to ceramic restorations, wear of the restoration itself and physiological wear of the natural tooth. The same intervention will be carried out for the duration of the project, at the following time intervals: baseline (day of cementation of the restoration), 1 month, 6 months and annually. If an intraoral scanner is not available, silicone impressions will be made, which will be cast with plaster and scanned extraorally.

The investigators will work with a sample "n" of 75 patients, collected over the next two years. Depending on the material used to fabricate the restoration, 4 different groups will be differentiated: monolithic zirconia (group 1), metal-ceramic (group 2), lithium disilicate (group 3) and natural tooth (control group). The patients will be randomly distributed into the different groups using the online randomisation software www.alazarinfo.es.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

75

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Valencia, Spain, 46010
        • Recruiting
        • Mª Fernanda Solá Ruiz
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

INCLUSION CRITERIA:

  • Patients in need of single tooth restorations on posterior teeth.
  • Age range: between 18 years of age.
  • No contraindications for dental treatment.
  • Good oral hygiene.
  • No periodontal disease or treated periodontal disease.
  • Absence of temporomandibular disorder and/or untreated habits or parafunctions.

Inclusion criteria for abutment teeth:

  1. Posterior tooth requiring placement of a single tooth restoration. Restorability: with a crown:root ratio of at least 1:1.
  2. The presence of an unrestored or minimally restored natural antagonist tooth (teeth with no more than a Class II restoration), in the same quadrant as the treated tooth (G1,2,3).
  3. The presence of two unrestored or minimally restored antagonist teeth (in the same quadrants or on the contralateral side) (G4 or control).
  4. Minimum height of the dental stump: 3mm.

EXCLUSION CRITERIA:

Exclusion criteria for abutment teeth:

  1. Antagonist tooth with a full coverage restoration.
  2. Opposing arch with fixed or removable partial denture.
  3. Lack of occlusal contact points in the enamel of the control teeth.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Wear of antagonist teeth to monolithic zirconia restorations
Evaluate enamel wear antagonist to monolithic zirconia restorations monitoring the short and medium-term volume loss and assessing the factors that may influence this wear.
Treatment with monolithic zirconia restorations on teeth (single crowns). The sample (75 patients) will be divided into three groups according to the ceramic material used: monolithic zirconia, lithium disilicate and metal ceramic.
Experimental: Wear of antagonist teeth to lithium disilicate restorations
Evaluate enamel wear antagonist to lithium disilicate restorations monitoring the short and medium-term volume loss and assessing the factors that may influence this wear.
Treatment with lithium disilicate restorations on teeth (single crowns). The sample (75 patients) will be divided into three groups according to the ceramic material used: monolithic zirconia, lithium disilicate and metal ceramic.
Experimental: Wear of antagonist teeth to metalceramic restorations
Evaluate enamel wear antagonist to metal ceramic restorations monitoring the short and medium-term volume loss and assessing the factors that may influence this wear.
Treatment with metal ceramic restorations on teeth (single crowns). The sample (75 patients) will be divided into three groups according to the ceramic material used: monolithic zirconia, lithium disilicate and metal ceramic.
Experimental: Wear of natural enamel
Evaluate physiological enamel wear (control group) monitoring the short short and medium-term volume loss and assessing the factors that may influence this wear.
No intervention.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Enamel volume loss
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of two years
Analyse volume loss of enamel antagonist to monolithic zirconia, lithium disilicate and metal ceramic restorations. The investigators will also analyse whether the wear of the tooth antagonistic to the different restorations differs significantly with respect to the physiological wear of the natural tooth (control group).
Through study completion, an average of two years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Survival
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of two years
To compare the survival between monolithic zirconia, lithium disilicate and metal ceramic restorations.
Through study completion, an average of two years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mª Fernanda Solá Ruiz, Dentistry, University of Valencia

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

March 1, 2024

Study Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 1, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 14, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

July 15, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 1, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 31, 2022

Last Verified

May 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Outcome

Clinical Trials on Treatment with monolithic zirconia restorations

Subscribe