Evaluation of Extended Scope Physiotherapists in an Orthopaedic Outpatient Shoulder Clinic

August 14, 2018 updated by: Central Jutland Regional Hospital

Clinical Examination by Extended Scope Physiotherapists and Orthopaedic Surgeons in an Outpatient Shoulder Clinic: Agreement on Diagnosis and Treatment Plan and Evaluation of Costs and Organisation

This study investigates the agreement between extended scope physiotherapists (ESP) and orthopaedic surgeons (OS) on diagnosis and treatment plan in an orthopaedic outpatient shoulder clinic. Furthermore a cost analysis and an evaluation of the interdisciplinary collaboration at the orthopaedic outpatient shoulder clinic (termed shoulder clinic in the following) will be performed.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

According to current practice, patients referred from a general practitioner (GP) to the Orthopaedic Outpatient Shoulder Clinic, Silkeborg Regional Hospital (SRH), Denmark, will be examined by either an orthopaedic surgeon (OS) or an extended scope physiotherapist (ESP), as these two groups of health professionals share this assignment. The decision on, which health professional is considered most appropriate to examine the patient, is done by a senior orthopaedic surgeon based on the available information in the referral letter from the GP. Three categories of appropriateness are used: most appropriate to be examined by an OS, most appropriate to be examined by an ESP and equally appropriate to be examined by an ESP or an OS.

The overall purpose of this study is to evaluate the quality of the shared assignment investigated through both professional and organisational outcomes. The following three subsidiary objectives are used:

  1. To estimate the agreement between ESP's and OS's on diagnosis and treatment plan (primary subsidiary objective)
  2. To estimate direct hospital costs of an examination performed by an ESP and an OS, respectively, and to estimate the difference in costs.
  3. To describe the interdisciplinary collaborative practice including evaluation of the extent of relational coordination.

Methods are described underneath related to each subsidiary objective.

  1. The study is conducted at the shoulder clinic, SRH. Eligibility criteria, intervention and outcomes are described elsewhere.

    Primary analysis:

    Agreement between ESP and OS in choice of treatment plan (three categories: 1) referral to physiotherapy, 2) need of further diagnostic examination, steroid injection or surgery and 3) no intervention) will be evaluated by estimating the proportion of agreement between

    • The individual registrations of the ESP and OS
    • The individual registration of the ESP and the common decision
    • The individual registration of the OS and the common decision Furthermore, McNemar's test will be used to compare the individual registrations of the ESP and OS, respectively, against the common decision

    Secondary analyses:

    Agreement between ESP and OS in choice of treatment plan (five categories: as described in the outcome section) will be evaluated the same way as described above.

    Agreement between ESP and OS in diagnosis of the patient will be evaluated by estimating both the proportion of total agreement and partial agreement between the two health professionals. Total agreement is defined as ESP and OS having registered the same primary diagnosis. Partial agreement is defined as ESP and OS having registered the same diagnosis but one of them considers it the primary diagnosis while the other considers it a secondary diagnosis.

  2. Mean hospital costs of an examination of a shoulder patient will be estimated based on the cohort used to evaluate agreement on diagnosis and treatment plan. Mean hospital costs per patient in the cohort will be estimated separately for ESP's and OS's based on salaries for the health professionals and amount of ordered supplemental diagnostic examinations (X-ray, MR imaging, MR arthrography, CT imaging, ENG, EMG) in each group. Difference in costs will be estimated.
  3. Relational coordination in interdisciplinary collaborative practice will be described through separate semi-structured group interviews with ESP's and OS's, respectively.

The Association of Danish Physiotherapists is partly funding the salary for the principal investigator.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

69

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Silkeborg, Denmark, 8600
        • Silkeborg Regional Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with shoulder problems referred to the shoulder clinic at Silkeborg Regional Hospital.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Above the age of 18 years
  • Referred to The Shoulder Clinic at Silkeborg Regional Hospital
  • Considered equally appropriate to be examined by an ESP or an OS
  • Ability to read and understand Danish

Exclusion Criteria:

  • None

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Cross-Sectional

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Shoulder patients
Shoulder patients referred to examination at the shoulder clinic, Silkeborg Regional Hospital.

Patients will be examined twice the same day by an extended scope physiotherapist (ESP) and an orthopaedic surgeon (OS) in random order. They will independently and blinded to each other's opinion register

  • diagnosis and treatment plan (including need for further diagnostic examinations - i.e. imaging)
  • if the patient needs a new appointment at the shoulder clinic
  • if they under usual conditions would discuss their results with the opposite health professional before deciding diagnosis and treatment plan.

After the individual examinations the ESP and OS discuss their results and come to an agreement (common decision) regarding the patient's diagnosis, treatment plan and need of a new appointment. Patients will be informed only of the common decision of the ESP and OS.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Treatment plan - orthopaedic surgeon
Time Frame: Baseline
Treatment plan suggested by the OS will be registered in a chart developed for the occasion. The chart has 5 pre-defined categories: 1) referral to physiotherapy, 2) referral to diagnostic examination, 3) steroid injection, 4) surgery and 5) no intervention (categorical)
Baseline
Treatment plan - physiotherapist
Time Frame: Baseline
Treatment plan suggested by the ESP will be registered in a chart developed for the occasion. The chart has the same 5 pre-defined categories as for the OS: 1) referral to physiotherapy, 2) referral to diagnostic examination, 3) steroid injection, 4) surgery and 5) no intervention (categorical)
Baseline
Treatment plan - common decision
Time Frame: Baseline
The OS and ESP will discuss their results until they agree which treatment plan to offer the patient. Their decision will be registered in a chart developed for the occasion. The chart has the same 5 pre-defined categories as for the individual examinations: 1) referral to physiotherapy, 2) referral to diagnostic examination, 3) steroid injection, 4) surgery and 5) no intervention (categorical)
Baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diagnosis - orthopaedic surgeon
Time Frame: Baseline
One primary diagnosis (and if relevant secondary diagnoses) suggested by the OS will be registered in a chart developed for the occasion. The chart has 9 pre-defined categories of diagnoses: 1) impingement, 2) rotator cuff injury, 3) glenohumeral instability, 4) glenohumeral osteoarthritis, 5) periarthritis humeroscapularis, 6) scapular instability, 7) fracture sequelae, 8) acromioclavicular joint disorder, 9) non-related shoulder diagnoses (categorical).
Baseline
Diagnosis - physiotherapist
Time Frame: Baseline
One primary diagnosis (and if relevant secondary diagnoses) suggested by the ESP will be registered in a chart developed for the occasion. The chart has the same 9 pre-defined categories of diagnoses as for the OS (categorical).
Baseline
Diagnosis - common decision
Time Frame: Baseline
The OS and ESP will discuss their results until they agree on patient diagnosis. Their decision will be registered in a chart developed for the occasion. The chart has the same 9 pre-defined categories of diagnoses as for the individual examinations (categorical).
Baseline
New appointment - orthopaedic surgeon
Time Frame: Baseline
The OS registers whether he considers, that the patient should be offered a new appointment at the shoulder clinic (categorical, yes/no)
Baseline
New appointment - physiotherapist
Time Frame: Baseline
The ESP registers whether he/she considers, that the patient should be offered a new appointment at the shoulder clinic (categorical, yes/no)
Baseline
New appointment - common decision
Time Frame: Baseline
The OS and ESP will discuss their results until they agree, whether the patient should have a new appointment at the shoulder clinic or not. Their decision will be registered (categorical, yes/no)
Baseline
Discussion needed - orthopaedic surgeon
Time Frame: Baseline
The OS registers whether he under usual conditions would discuss his results with an ESP before making a decision on diagnosis or treatment plan (categorical, yes/no).
Baseline
Discussion needed - physiotherapist
Time Frame: Baseline
The ESP registers whether he/she under usual conditions would discuss his/her results with an OS before making a decision on diagnosis or treatment plan (categorical, yes/no).
Baseline

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Salary - orthopaedic surgeon, first clinical examination
Time Frame: Baseline
Mean expenditure on salary for an OS performing a clinical examination of a shoulder patient at the first visit. The estimate will be calculated based on time spent on the examination and mean salary for an OS (information on mean salary will be obtained from statistics at the finance department at the hospital)
Baseline
Salary - orthopaedic surgeon, planned new appointment
Time Frame: Baseline
Mean expenditure on salary for an OS performing a follow up appointment with a shoulder patient. The estimate will be calculated based on time spent on the appointment and mean salary for an OS (information on mean salary will be obtained from statistics at the finance department at the hospital)
Baseline
Salary - extended scope physiotherapist, first clinical examination
Time Frame: Baseline
Mean expenditure on salary for an ESP performing a clinical examination of a shoulder patient at the first visit. The estimate will be calculated based on time spent on the examination and mean salary for an ESP (information on mean salary will be obtained from statistics at the finance department at the hospital)
Baseline
Salary - extended scope physiotherapist, planned new appointment
Time Frame: Baseline
Mean expenditure on salary for an ESP performing a follow up appointment with a shoulder patient. The estimate will be calculated based on time spent on the appointment and mean salary for an ESP (information on mean salary will be obtained from statistics at the finance department at the hospital)
Baseline
Costs - computed tomography (CT) imaging
Time Frame: Baseline
Expenditure on CT imaging. Estimate obtained from the finance department at the hospital.
Baseline
Costs - magnetic resonance (MR) imaging
Time Frame: Baseline
Expenditure on MR imaging. Estimate obtained from the finance department at the hospital.
Baseline
Costs - MR arthrography
Time Frame: Baseline
Expenditure on MR arthrography. Estimate obtained from the finance department at the hospital.
Baseline
Costs - electroneurography (ENG)
Time Frame: Baseline
Expenditure on ENG. Estimate obtained from the finance department at the hospital.
Baseline
Costs - electromyography (EMG)
Time Frame: Baseline
Expenditure on EMG. Estimate obtained from the finance department at the hospital.
Baseline
Costs - X-ray
Time Frame: Baseline
Expenditure on X-ray. Estimate obtained from the finance department at the hospital.
Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Merete N Madsen, MSc, Silkeborg Regional Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 17, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 13, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

June 19, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 10, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 10, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

November 17, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 15, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 14, 2018

Last Verified

February 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Musculoskeletal Pain

Clinical Trials on Examination

3
Subscribe