The Use of LiDCOplus in Fluid Resuscitation Decision-Making

November 20, 2017 updated by: NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde

Does the Use of LiDCOplus Alter Decision-making in Fluid Prescription During Resuscitation in the Intensive Care Unit.

Unwell patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) often need supplementary fluids to be given into the bloodstream through a drip in a vein (venous cannula), however too much fluid can be harmful. It can sometimes be difficult to tell whether or not a patient will benefit from extra fluids so they are given a "fluid challenge", whereby a small volume of fluid is given quickly into the cannula and the change in their status is noted. If the patient's condition improves, this suggests that the patient is "fluid responsive" and needs more fluid.

A LiDCOplus haemodynamic monitor is a device used in the ICU to estimate the amount of blood ejected from the heart on each heartbeat using pressure readings obtained from a tube placed in one of the patient's arteries (arterial line).

The investigators aim to determine whether or not the use of this device called makes a difference to the judgement of "fluid responsiveness" when the patient is given a fluid challenge when compared to simply using measurements of pulse and blood pressure and assessing the circulation in the patient's limbs. This will allow the investigators to determine whether or not the LiDCOplus alters the decisions made by doctors and nurses about how much fluid to give their patients and hence if it is of any benefit.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

45

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Glasgow, United Kingdom, G4 0SF
        • Glasgow Royal Infirmary

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Adult patients in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) undergoing fluid resuscitation guided by fluid challenges monitored by a LiDCOplus haemodynamic monitor.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients
  • Admitted to Intensive Care Unit (ICU)
  • Undergoing fluid resuscitation guided by fluid challenges
  • Monitored by a LiDCOplus haemodynamic monitor attached to an arterial line

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Poor arterial line trace
  • Moribund state
  • Patient / relative refusal
  • Contra-indication to fluid bolus

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Only
  • Time Perspectives: Cross-Sectional

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Patients undergoing fluid resuscitation
Adult patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) undergoing fluid resuscitation guided by the LiDCOplus haemodynamic monitor.
Patients in study group receive intravenous fluid bolus as part of standard fluid resuscitation. Fluid responsiveness (i.e. improvement in cardiac output) is estimated using both standard clinical parameters and by LiDCOplus haemodynamic monitor (with the clinician initially blinded to the latter) before a final decision about fluid responsiveness is made.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fluid responsiveness decisions changed by use of LiDCOplus
Time Frame: 10 minutes
Proportion of decisions about fluid management changed by knowledge of the change in stroke volume post fluid challenge, as derived by LiDCOplus haemodynamic monitor.
10 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: James A Patterson, MBChB, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 22, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 31, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

October 31, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 25, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 20, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

November 22, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 22, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 20, 2017

Last Verified

November 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Shock

Clinical Trials on LiDCOplus haemodynamic monitor

Subscribe