Pragmatic Prehospital Group O Whole Blood Early Resuscitation Trial (PPOWER)

September 9, 2021 updated by: Jason Sperry

Pragmatic Prehospital Group O Whole Blood Early Resuscitation (PPOWER) Trial: A Prospective, Interventional,Randomized, 3 Year, Pilot Clinical Trial

Despite advances in trauma resuscitation, a paucity of therapeutic interventions are available early enough to reduce the downstream morbidity and mortality attributable to hemorrhage, shock and coagulopathy. Due to the time sensitive nature of the treatment of hemorrhage, the ideal resuscitation intervention would entail use of a blood product containing all essential hemostatic components, closest to time of injury, where prevention or reversal of the devastating downstream consequences of shock and coagulopathy can occur. This proposal will characterized the efficacy of whole blood resuscitation initiated in the prehospital setting to patients in hemorrhagic shock which represents this ideal intervention post-injury. These results will have great potential to dramatically change the way trauma resuscitation occurs today.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Traumatic injury represents an incredible health care burden in the United States and worldwide. Hemorrhage is estimated to be responsible for over 40% of all trauma-related deaths. Ongoing traumatic blood loss is complicated by the well-known 'lethal triad' of coagulopathy, hypothermia and acidosis which results in further unbridled hemorrhage. Uncontrolled bleeding, resultant shock and organ dysfunction remain the leading causes of early in-hospital mortality. Despite advances in trauma resuscitation, a paucity of therapeutic interventions are available early enough to reduce the downstream morbidity and mortality attributable to hemorrhage, shock and coagulopathy.

In-hospital resuscitation of traumatic hemorrhage has changed over the past decade. The underlying principle of current resuscitation practice focuses on preventing or reversing the effects of coagulopathy with the early use of a balanced component transfusion strategy (1:1:1 - plasma: packed red blood cells: platelets). This reconstituted strategy has also been coined 'whole blood-like' resuscitation despite being inferior compositionally to whole blood. The use of whole blood was historically the gold standard for treating hemorrhagic shock during World War I and II, prior to sweeping changes in blood banking practice. Whole blood use continues today and is thought to provide the bleeding patient the identical components they are losing with maximal resuscitative and hemostatic effects.

Recent military experiences continue to show the benefits of fresh whole blood resuscitation demonstrating significant survival and hemostatic advantages. Whole blood has also been postulated to improve microcirculatory hemodynamics, reduce the 'storage lesion' effect and minimize donor exposure risks. A recent civilian study has also demonstrated benefit using modified whole blood after arrival to the hospital where appropriate blood typing and cross matching was performed prior to transfusion. Due to the time sensitive nature of the treatment of hemorrhage, the ideal resuscitation intervention would entail use of a blood product containing all essential hemostatic components, closest to time of injury, where prevention or reversal of the devastating downstream consequences of shock and coagulopathy can occur.

Initiation of whole blood resuscitation in the prehospital setting and continued through the in-hospital phase of treatment to patients in hemorrhagic shock represents this ideal intervention post-injury. Essential to the prehospital initiation of whole blood resuscitation in the civilian population is need for it to be transfused without the need for blood typing or cross matching. Of similar importance is the need for cold storage and recycling of any unused whole blood product, allowing maximal utility of this precious resource.

Based upon the belief that early whole blood resuscitation represents the most efficacious hemostatic resuscitation product for the management of hemorrhage, the University of Pittsburgh is currently utilizing cold stored, low titer, platelet replete-leukocyte reduced, group O whole blood (LTLR-WB) for urgent release in the emergency department, without the need for blood typing or cross matching, for patients in hemorrhagic shock. The hypothesis is that the initiation of LTLR-WB resuscitation in the prehospital setting with continuation through the in-hospital acute resuscitation phase of care will significantly reduce the morbidity and mortality attributable to hemorrhagic shock post-injury as compared to standard prehospital and in-hospital resuscitation practice. Thus, a large pragmatic clinical trial is needed to definitively establish the efficacy and safety of whole blood resuscitation initiated in the prehospital setting. Only a high quality clinical trial will provide the essential evidence to justify and provide the impetus for the use of this precious blood banking resource early post-injury. Because of the challenges associated with execution of these types of large trials particularly in the prehospital setting, it is essential to establish feasibility of this approach in a pilot study and provide experience to inform a definitive large, multicenter whole blood trial. The University of Pittsburgh has a track record of prehospital interventional trials post-injury and the clinical research infrastructure to successfully execute the following this trial.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

86

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15213
        • University of Pittsburgh

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 89 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Injured patients being transport via an air medical service with hypotension (SBP =/< 90mmHg with tachycardia >108 OR SBP=/<70 without the tachycardia requirement)

Exclusion Criteria:

Age < 18 or > 89 years

Isolated fall from standing injury mechanism

Brain matter exposed or penetrating brain injury (GSW)

CPR > 5 mins with out ROSC

Isolated burns without evidence of traumatic injury

Isolated Drowning or Hanging

No Intravenous or Intraosseous access

Known prisoner or known pregnancy

Referral Hospital Admission

Wearing No PPOWER bracelet

Objection to study voiced by subject or family at scene

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: LTLR-WB
Receiving 2 units of low titer, leucocyte reduced, platelet replete whole blood initiated in the prehospital setting during air medical transport and continued (up to 6 units of whole blood followed by standard component resuscitation) thru the early in-hospital phase of care
Low titer, group O, leukocyte reduced, platelet replete, cold stored whole blood
No Intervention: Standard Care
Receiving standard prehospital air medical care and standard of care component (1:1:1) trauma resuscitation thru the early in-hospital phase of care

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
28 Day All Cause Mortality
Time Frame: 28 days from admission
28 day all cause mortality
28 days from admission

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of Multiple Organ Failure
Time Frame: 28 days from admission
multiple organ failure using the Denver post-injury MOF score which is a summed score and when the score is 4 or greater from 4 organ system scores, MOF is designated; 4 organ systems (pulmonary [0-3], renal [0-3], hepatic [0-3], cardiovascular [0-3])
28 days from admission
24 Hour Mortality
Time Frame: 24 hours from admission
24 hour mortality
24 hours from admission

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jason Sperry, MD, University of Pittsburgh

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 20, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 30, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

October 30, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 19, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 19, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

March 26, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 6, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 9, 2021

Last Verified

September 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • R34HL135224 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hemorrhagic Shock

Clinical Trials on Whole blood

3
Subscribe