Sternal Intraosseous Transfusion of Autologous Whole Blood: A Comparison of Flow Rates and Degree of Hemolysis

December 7, 2017 updated by: Haukeland University Hospital
In this study the impact of two CE marked and FDA approved sternal needles in comparison to intravenous access on the flow-rate of autologous reinfusion of whole blood and the possible hemolysis of red cells post-transfusion in a population of healthy military officers is investigated.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Intraosseous (IO) access is an old technique for achieving entrance to the systemic circulation, which has gained resurgence in the last 30 years.

Whether due to trauma or disease, vascular collapse may delay or preclude even experienced medical providers from obtaining standard intravenous (IV) access. Access to the vascular system of the critically ill or injured adult or pediatric patient is essential for resuscitation, and flow rates close up to what can be obtained by using intravenous access is preferable in patient needing immediate fluid boluses for shock resuscitation. Intraosseous access takes advantage of the vascularity of cancellous bone, the spongy bone inside the hard, and access to the highly vascular intramedullary space of bones provides a direct link to central circulation. In addition to using long bones, the sternum is used for intraosseous access and has gained increased use especially in combat casualty care.

However, in a recent publication, the intraosseous route used for transfusion of blood components is questioned. Based on theoretical models for flow rates through porous media and personal clinical observations the authors conclude that the maximum flow rates attainable for transfusion of blood via intraosseous route are inadequate for successful resuscitation. They also fear that additional pressure needed to obtain adequate flow rate may cause hemolysis of red blood cells. Further they postulate that as the bone mineral density reaches a peak occurring in the early 20s, and that a small increase in bone density may cause exponential decrease in intrinsic permeability, there could be a 10-fold decrease in permeability in military age causalities compared to the elderly. The critical points highlighted in this review are in great contrast to recent experience with the use of sternal and humeral I.O's in Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF).

This observational study investigates the impact of two CE marked and FDA approved sternal needles in comparison to intravenous access on the flow-rate of autologous reinfusion of whole blood and the possible hemolysis of red cells post-transfusion in a population of healthy military officers. We also investigate the technical success rate of sternal IO Access between two CE marked and FDA approved sternal Devices. As a supplementary investigation we seek to investigate the anatomic changes as shown by Magnetic Resonance Imaging in individuals who have received multiple intraosseous sternal needles With autologous reinfusion of whole blood.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bergen, Norway, 5021
        • Haukeland University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 45 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Healthy military officers

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male, Professional special forces military officers
  • Medically cleared for for military exercise or Activity
  • Signed standardized informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants who will not provide informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Reinfusion - Fast1
Case: Autologous reinfusion through Fast1 sternal needle. (Pyng Medical) CE marked/FDA Approved
Reinfusion - T.A.L.O.N
Case: Autologous reinfusion through T.A.L.O.N sternal needle. (Vidacare) CE Marked/FDA approved
Reinfusion - Intravenous line
Control: Autologous reinfusion through standard intravenous line

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Flowrate of reinfusion of whole blood
Time Frame: 45 minutes
The total time of reinfusion of 450cc Whole blood
45 minutes
Post transfusion hemolysis
Time Frame: 3 hours
Hemolysis as measured by Haptoglobin and LD measures
3 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Success rate of sternal IO access
Time Frame: 30 minutes
The success rate of a valid IO Access, evaluated by expret
30 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

November 1, 2016

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

October 1, 2017

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

December 5, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 4, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 4, 2016

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

October 5, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

December 8, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 7, 2017

Last Verified

October 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2014/691

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

De-identified individual participant data for all primary and secondary outcome measures will be made available within 6 months of study completion.

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hemorrhagic Shock

Clinical Trials on Reinfusion - Sternal IO needle

Subscribe