SHARE (Sharing Goals and Preferences) Study

March 15, 2022 updated by: Nancy L. Keating, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
This research study is evaluating the usefulness of a video and questionnaire to help cancer patients think about the goals of their care.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

The investigators are conducting a study with patients from Dana Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI) and DFCI-affiliate at St. Elizabeth's Hospital who are being treated for their cancer. The purpose of the study is to test the implementation of a short video, a brief questionnaire, and a wallet card designed to help patients understand and articulate their goals and preferences when making decisions about their cancer treatment and communicate these preferences to their clinicians.

The short video and brief questionnaire were developed to help patients with cancer think about their goals of care and their treatment and information preferences and to prompt discussions with their health care team about these preferences. The wallet card is designed to help patients remember some key questions that may be useful as they make decisions about future treatments

A pilot test will be completed to assess the feasibility and usability of the revised "More Good Days" video, brief questionnaire and wallet card in helping seriously-ill cancer patients think about what a good day means to them and test whether these tools can help patients to identify and communicate their medical treatment preferences and goals with their care team.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

53

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02215
        • Dana Farber Cancer Institute
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02062
        • Dana Farber Cancer Institute at St Elizabeth
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
        • Nancy Keating

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient who are receiving treatment at:

    • DFCI in the thoracic oncology group
    • DFCI-affiliated St. Elizabeth's Hospital and have progressed on 2nd line or later-line systemic therapies (chemotherapy, immunotherapy, biological, or targeted therapies)
  • Clinicians' schedules to identify patients with metastatic cancers who are considering or pursuing additional palliative therapy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who are not interested in the study
  • Patients of physicians who opt out of participating
  • Patients whose physicians did not opt out, but whose physician does not think they are well suited for the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: More Good Days video&brief questionnaire
  • Participants will watch the More Good Days video and will be given a brief questionnaire and wallet card to help identify their goals and preferences about information and care
  • The More Good Days video is developed to help patients with advanced cancer think about what a good day means to them and to help them think about questions they may have for their physicians when discussing treatments.
  • The 3-page brief questionnaire is designed to help patients identify their preferences about information and care and to help encourage a conversation between patients and their doctors and health care team about their goals and preferences
  • The wallet card will help patients think about questions they may want to ask their providers when considering treatments.
Help patients with advanced cancer think about what a good day means to them and to help them think about questions they may have for their physicians when discussing treatments

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Enrollment
Time Frame: 2 years
% of patients invited to participate who choose to enroll
2 years
Overall rating of intervention
Time Frame: 1 month
% who rate intervention as good/very good/excellent.
1 month
Would recommend intervention to others
Time Frame: 1 month
% who would recommend intervention to others with cancers like theirs
1 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Preferred format for viewing video and completing questionnaire
Time Frame: 1 month
preferences for watching alone vs. with family; in clinic vs. home, interest in accessing via electronic record portal
1 month
Patient anxiety
Time Frame: 1 month
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) (score 0 to 21 for 7 anxiety items, higher=more anxiety)
1 month
Patient distress
Time Frame: 1 month
National Comprehensive Cancer Network distress thermometer (score 0 to 10, higher worse distress)
1 month
Patient depression
Time Frame: 1 month
Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) (9 items, score 0 to 27, higher = more depressed)
1 month
Hope
Time Frame: 1 month
Hearth Hope Index (12 items, score 12 to 48, higher = more hope)
1 month
FACIT-PAL Quality of Life
Time Frame: 1 month
FACIT-PAL instrument general quality of life (27 general items, score 0 to 108, higher=better quality of life)
1 month
Quality of life-palliative care specific items
Time Frame: 1 month
Palliative care subscale of FACITPAL (14 items, score 0 to 56, higher = better quality of life)
1 month
Therapeutic Alliance
Time Frame: 1 month
Human Connection Scale (16 items, score 16 to 64, higher = more therapeutic alliance)
1 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Nancy L Keating, MD, Harvard Medical School (HMS and HSDM)

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 23, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 18, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

March 15, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 20, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 4, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

January 5, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 17, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 15, 2022

Last Verified

March 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 17-520

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Other Cancer

3
Subscribe