Shared Care: Patient-Centered Management After Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

November 1, 2022 updated by: Gregory A. Abel, MD, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
This research study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of allowing patients who have had a hematopoietic cell transplant to receive some of their post-transplant care with a local oncologist rather than returning to the transplant center for all of their follow-up.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (HCT) - also known as bone marrow transplant - is only available at select centers in the United States which can collect and store stem cells, as well as care for patients before their new immune system cells take hold. For this reason, many patients who undergo HCT live at great distances from their HCT center. Also, after hospital discharge, the first 180 days post-HCT are very important, as patients must be managed closely with frequent follow-up visits.

A potential way to make life easier for HCT patients is to allow some of the post-transplant care to be provided by local oncologists who practice closer to where patients live. This could reduce the burden on patients and their caregivers; however, it is not known if a shared care model would ultimately benefit them. The investigators want to assess the effectiveness of a Shared Care program which allows patients to receive half of their post-HCT care at the HCT center, and the other half with their local oncologist

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

404

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Connecticut
      • Stamford, Connecticut, United States, 06902
        • Stamford Hospital
    • Maine
      • Bangor, Maine, United States, 04401
        • Northern Light Cancer Center dba Eastern Maine Medical Center
      • Brunswick, Maine, United States, 04011
        • New England Cancer Specialists
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02215
        • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
      • Milford, Massachusetts, United States, 01757
        • Dana-Farber at Milford
      • Weymouth, Massachusetts, United States, 02190
        • Dana-Farber at South Shore Hospital
    • New Hampshire
      • Londonderry, New Hampshire, United States, 03053
        • Dana-Farber at Londonderry
    • New York
      • Albany, New York, United States, 12206
        • New York Oncology Hematology
    • Rhode Island
      • Providence, Rhode Island, United States, 02903
        • Lifespan Cancer Institute at Rhode Island Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age >= 18 years of age
  • Scheduled to receive an allogeneic HCT at the Dana-Farber Inpatient Hospital or BWH under the care of a DFCI physician
  • Residence in New York, Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Connecticut, or Massachusetts
  • Referred from or live less than 1 hour from one of the local participating centers.
  • Ability to read English (to fill out standard QOL forms)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age <18 years of age
  • Scheduled to receive an autologous HCT
  • Has received an allogeneic transplant in the past; scheduled to receive a second allogeneic transplant
  • Did not receive an allogeneic HCT at Dana-Farber
  • Does not live in New York, Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Connecticut, or Massachusetts

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Shared Care
  • For the first 90 days, patients alternate between local oncologist and DFCI for weekly visits.
  • From 90 to 180 days, patients alternate between local and DFCI every 2-3 weeks.
  • Shared Care include the following

    • Formal Care Coordination Plan
    • Patient Engagement and Education
    • Local Oncologist Engagement and Education
    • Patient/Local Oncologist/Transplant Oncologist Web Portal
Shared Care involves four specific strategies to allow patients to have a portion of their care locally after HCT, where clinic and laboratory visits are equally shared between the local oncologist and primary HCT team
Other: Usual Care
  • Patients receive all follow-up care at DFCI only, which is currently the Standard Care.
  • Majority of routine visits in first 180 days will be at DFCI.
The usual care provided by the transplant center at DFCI.
Other: Non-Randomized
Patients receive all follow-up care at DFCI only (Standard Care).
The usual care provided by the transplant center at DFCI.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Highly-relevant PROs for Shared versus Usual Care at 180 days post-HCT
Time Frame: 180 days
Fact-BMT (standard measure of transplant-related quality of life)
180 days
Highly-relevant PROs for Shared versus Usual Care at 180 days post-HCT
Time Frame: 180 days
EORTC QLQ-C30 (standard measure of cancer-related quality of life)
180 days
Highly-relevant PROs for Shared versus Usual Care at 180 days post-HCT
Time Frame: 180 days
Dana-Farber post-transplant Survey (questionnaire developed to measure financial hardship after transplant; See Abel, et al BBMT, 2016)
180 days
100-day non-relapse mortality (NRM) for patients in Shared Care versus Usual Care
Time Frame: 100 days
NRM
100 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall Survival
Time Frame: 2 years
OS
2 years
cGVHD
Time Frame: 2 years
cGVHD
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Gregory A. Abel, MD MPH, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 22, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

August 22, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 3, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 7, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

August 10, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 2, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 1, 2022

Last Verified

November 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 17-253

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Other Cancer

Clinical Trials on Shared Care

3
Subscribe