A Naturalistic Experiment Evaluating the Impact of Medicaid Treatment Reimbursement Changes on Opioid Prescribing and Patient Outcomes Among Patients With Back Pain (Back on Track)

January 7, 2021 updated by: Kaiser Permanente

PCORI-1609-36568 A Naturalistic Experiment Evaluating the Impact of Medicaid Treatment Reimbursement Changes on Opioid Prescribing and Patient Outcomes Among Patients With Back Pain

Back on Track is a quasi-experimental, mixed-methods study of a unique natural experiment that will answer the question: what is the comparative effectiveness of different payer or health-system strategies that aim to prevent unsafe opioid prescribing? The State of Oregon is enacting a Medicaid reimbursement policy to enhance access to evidence-based non-pharmacotherapeutic treatment options while restricting reimbursement for opioids for back pain. We will assess whether the policy decreases unsafe opioid prescribing and improves patient outcomes compared with usual back pain treatment practices in a comparable state, California, that is not changing Medicaid payment policy.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Back pain is one of the most common reasons patients seek medical care, and it can have a big impact on patients' quality of life and functioning. Patients and providers are becoming more frustrated with common back pain treatments like the long-term use of opioid medications and steroid injections, which have been shown to have limited long-term impact on patients' pain and day-to-day functioning and can have safety risks.

The State of Oregon recently changed what back and neck pain treatments they cover for its Medicaid enrollees. This started to affect those insured by Medicaid in July 2016 and was implemented by January 2018. These changes ended payments for treatments like long-term opioid therapy and injections. They also expanded coverage for nondrug treatments, such as acupuncture, osteopathic or chiropractic manipulation, physical/occupational therapy, and cognitive behavioral therapy. While experts agree that opioid use must be reduced, Oregon is among the first states to try such strong measures to promote nondrug treatments and prevent the use of long-term opioid treatment for back and neck pain.

The Oregon Medicaid reimbursement changes for back and neck pain treatment create the opportunity for a "natural experiment." In this mixed-methods, observational study, we will evaluate the impact of the reimbursement changes by comparing outcomes among patients with back pain in Oregon who will have access to these expanded nondrug treatments to similar patients seen in comparable clinics in California where expanded services for back and neck pain are not covered by the type of comprehensive payer incentive undertaken in Oregon.

Specifically, we will use electronic health record, Medicaid claims data, and data obtained from a longitudinal patient survey to assess the impact of the changes on:

  • Patients' pain severity, pain related functioning, and satisfaction with care
  • Patients' use of pain-related health care services
  • Opioid use
  • Unintended consequences, such as the use of illicit drugs (While we expect the Oregon Medicaid change to result in many positive changes, limiting the use of opioids and pain reducing procedures like injections may motivate some individuals to use drugs that were not prescribed by their doctor.)

In addition, we will use qualitative research methods to characterize the facilitators and barriers experienced by patients, health care providers, and clinic administrators and staff in adopting the Medicaid reimbursement changes and their satisfaction with the constellation of available and utilized services.

Thus, this study has three components: 1) patient survey, 2) administrative data-based study (data-only), and 3) qualitative evaluation. This record focuses on the component of the study in which subjects are able to enroll - the patient survey.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

2748

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Oregon
      • Portland, Oregon, United States, 97201
        • OCHIN, Inc.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patient survey: Medicaid-insured adults age 18-65 years who are diagnosed with back or neck pain and receive their primary health care from participating OCHIN member federally-qualified health centers in Oregon and California. Patients may have acute or chronic pain and may be receiving long-term opioid therapy or not receiving long-term opioid therapy.

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  1. Adults age 18-65 years
  2. Insured by Medicaid
  3. Have back or neck pain (based on ICD-CM diagnosis)
  4. Receive their primary health care at participating OCHIN member federally qualified health centers in Oregon and California

Exclusion criteria:

  1. Patients with current malignant cancer diagnosis
  2. Any evidence of patient having received hospice or other end-of-life palliative care within the past year

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Oregon patients
Adult Medicaid patients with back pain who get their care in community health clinics in Oregon
California patients
Adult Medicaid patients with back pain who get their care in community health clinics in California

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain severity
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 months
Modified 10-item version of the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF), composite of pain intensity (3 items) and pain-related interference (7 items) subscales (10 items total; continuous)
Baseline to 12 months
Use of pain-related services
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 months
Use of pain-related services will be assessed by asking about use (Yes/no; binary) of the following pain-related services: Acupuncture, Chiropractic, Massage Therapy, Rehabilitation Therapies; Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) or Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT); Psychotherapy, Yoga Group or Class, and Stretching/Strengthening Exercise Therapy.
Baseline to 12 months
Patient satisfaction with health care services
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 months

Patient satisfaction with health care services will be assessed by asking the following question:

How satisfied have you been with the services you've received to help you manage your pain? (0-10 scale; continuous; higher score = more satisfied)

Baseline to 12 months
Negative outcomes related to pain services
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 months
Negative outcomes related to pain services will be assessed by asking the following question: Have you had any problems or bad outcomes from services that you have received or things you've done to manage your pain? (Yes/no; binary) If respond yes, a description of the problem or bad outcome is collected.
Baseline to 12 months
Illicit drug use
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 months

Illicit drug use will be assessed by asking the following four questions:

Have you used an opioid prescription medication that was not prescribed for you by your health care provider? (Yes/no; binary)

Have you used any street drugs to manage your pain? (Yes/no; binary) If respond yes, a description of the street drug(s) is collected.

Have you used any other types of prescription medications that were not prescribed for you by a health care provider to manage your pain? (Yes/no; binary) If respond yes, a description of the prescription medication(s) is collected.

Have you used heroin to manage your pain? (Yes/no; binary)

Baseline to 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Lynn DeBar, PhD, MPH, Kaiser Permanente

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 31, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 27, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 2, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

January 8, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 11, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 7, 2021

Last Verified

January 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • R217083

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Back Pain

3
Subscribe