- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01865539
Efficacy of Foot Orthotics in Veterans With Chronic Lower Back Pain
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Specific Aim 1: Utilizing a gold standard sham controlled randomized trial design, we will evaluate the change in pain, back related disability and quality of life in Veterans with chronic lower back pain who utilize either a custom foot orthotic or a sham orthotic.
As part of this aim the investigators will build on the teams strength of recruiting and enrolling Veteran's with chronic lower back pain into a randomized trial. The investigators will collect baseline pain and disability measures utilizing validated tools. Once the patients are enrolled, utilizing the "gold standard" placebo controlled design the investigators will randomize patients to receive either a custom foot orthotic or a sham orthotic. The Veterans will then be assessed at 5, 12 and 24-weeks post baseline to evaluate differences in pain and disability. Based on previous studies on the effectiveness of custom foot orthotics the investigators hypothesize that that Veteran's who receive the custom orthotic will experience less pain and disability as compared to those who receive the sham orthotics.
Specific Aim 2: To evaluate baseline characteristics of Veterans with chronic lower back pain predictive of responsiveness to custom foot orthotics including age, BMI, psychosocial characteristics and arch classification.
Focusing on the Veterans who receive the custom foot orthotic, the investigators next examine the important characteristics that may predict those Veterans who are most likely to benefit from wearing custom foot orthotics. Assessing potential confounders or facilitators of effectiveness of the custom foot orthotic will allow the investigators to best describe potential mechanisms of responsiveness. The investigators have chosen previously described confounders to responsiveness to treatment of chronic lower back pain, specifically age, body mass index and psychosocial characteristics. This methodology is particularly important in a sham controlled trial to assess if effectiveness or lack of thereof, is a factor of the intervention or from other confounding variables. The investigators have also chosen to evaluate the arch classification based on the measurement of the Veterans arch; again this allows for specific recommendations concerning use of this product. Based on previous studies on the effectiveness of custom foot orthotics in addition to previous studies evaluating chronic lower back pain the investigators hypothesize that those Veterans who are older, have a higher BMI and greater fear avoidance belief scores will show less responsiveness to the custom foot orthotics as compared to those younger Veterans who have a lower BMI and lower fear avoidance belief scores. In addition based on previous biomechanical literature, the investigators feel that those Veterans with a lower arch will show the greatest responsiveness to the custom foot orthotic.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
New York
-
Rochester, New York, United States, 14620
- Rochester Outpatient Clinic (ROPC) of the Canandaigua VA Medical Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
INCLUSION:
Ages 18-65 Lower back pain ≥ 3 months in duration Pain elicited upon deep palpation of the lumbar erector spinae musculature Primary complaint of CLBP from L1 to Sacroiliac joint inclusive. Ability/willingness to use orthotics in their shoes Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NRPS) of ≥ 3
- 30 mm on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
- 20% for the Modified Oswestry Disability Index (mODI)
EXCLUSION:
spinal surgery, spinal injections or injections in their feet within the past 6 months Inability to use orthotics in shoes Custom foot orthotics within the past 12 months Currently undergoing Chiropractic, Physical Therapy or Acupuncture treatment for their chronic lower back pain.
evidence of cauda equina syndrome, spinal neoplasia or metastatic disease, destructive joint pathology such as rheumatoid arthritis bowel/bladder dysfunction (associated with the back pain) peripheral neuropathy or progressive lumbosacral radiculopathy, progressive myelopathy or neurogenic claudication.
open workers compensation or no fault case.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Custom Foot Orthotic
Custom foot orthotic
|
Custom foot orthotic with custom design pads
Other Names:
|
|
Sham Comparator: Sham Orthotic
Will be a sham orthotic that will be the same as the actual orthotic without the custom support pads.
|
Leather insert without the custom design pads
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: 24 weeks.
|
Visual Analog Scales (VAS): VAS is rated from 0 to 100mm with 0 being no pain at all and 100mm being the worst pain imaginable.
The test has shown test-retest reliability, intra-examiner reliability and inter-examiner reliability.
|
24 weeks.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Modified Oswestry Disability Index (mODI)
Time Frame: 24 weeks.
|
The back pain specific, self-rating scale evaluates the degree of functional impairment that a patient is experiencing in a number of activities of daily living.
Oswestry is scored on a scale of 0-50 with 0 - 4 No disability 5 - 14 Mild disability 15 - 24 Moderate disability 25 - 34 Severe disability 35 - 50 Completely disabled
|
24 weeks.
|
|
Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function
Time Frame: 24 weeks.
|
For PROMIS measures, higher scores equals more of the concept being measured (more Physical Function).
Thus a score of 60 is one standard deviation above the average referenced population.
Specifically for PROMIS Physical function 50 indicates the reference population, therefore a score of 40 would be lower physical function.
|
24 weeks.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Paul E Dougherty, DC, Canandaigua VA Medical Center/ New York Chiropractic College
Publications and helpful links
Helpful Links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- MIRB00558
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Back Pain Lower Back Chronic
-
Adia Med of Winter Park LLCRecruitingLower Back Pain | Chronic Lower Back Pain | Chronic Mechanical Lower Back PainUnited States
-
Clinique de la Côte d'EmeraudeNot yet recruiting
-
Neuronoff, IncOhio Pain ClinicCompletedChronic Pain | Lower Back Pain ChronicUnited States
-
Texas Back InstituteRecruitingChronic Lower Back PainUnited States
-
New York Institute of TechnologyRecruitingChronic Lower Back PainUnited States
-
University of MichiganRecruiting
-
AppliedVR Inc.Completed
-
Federal University of Minas GeraisRecruitingBack Pain | Low Back Pain | Chronic Low-back Pain | Back Pain Lower Back ChronicBrazil
-
University of MichiganUnited States Department of DefenseRecruiting
-
CognifiSense Inc.University of Colorado, BoulderRecruitingChronic Pain | Chronic Back Pain | Chronic Lower Back Pain (CLBP)United States
Clinical Trials on Custom Foot Orthotic
-
University of California, DavisSoleitTerminatedArthropathy of Ankle or FootUnited States
-
GÖZDE KESİKBAŞCompletedPes PlanusTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Deborah Seligman, MSc., B.Sc.O.T.Completed
-
Patrick BoissyCompletedPsoriatic Arthritis | Foot ArthritisCanada
-
University of SevilleCompletedFasciitis, Plantar, ChronicSpain
-
AspetarQueen Margaret UniversityCompleted
-
Bioness IncUniversity of Cincinnati; Medidata SolutionsCompletedGait, Drop Foot | Sensorimotor Gait Disorder | Neurologic Ambulation Disorder | Poststroke Hemiparesis | Post-Cerebrovascular Accident (CVA) HemiparesisUnited States
-
University of SevilleTerminated
-
University of SevilleCompletedMusculoskeletal Pain | Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic | Foot OrthosesSpain