Lumbar Paravertebral in Hernia Surgery

Comparison Between Lumbar Paravertebral and Field Blocks in Pediatric Inguinal Hernia Surgery.

An inguinal hernia is one of the most common disorders requiring surgical repair in pediatrics. The effective treatment of postoperative pain in infants and children is challenging. Although the use of opioid analgesics is generally safe, adverse effects occur frequently, so the use of alternative analgesic techniques when available to improve postoperative analgesia while limiting opioid-related adverse effects, that is why there is an increase in the use of regional anesthetic techniques in infants and children.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Postoperative Pain
• Intervention / Treatment: Drug: Lumbar paravertebral group; Drug: The field block group

Detailed Description

Different anesthetic regional techniques can be used for anesthesia and analgesia of the lower abdominal surgeries such as caudal, spinal, epidural, transversus abdominis plane block, ilioinguinal nerve block, lumbar plexus block, the field block and abdominal paravertebral block. The use of regional anesthesia with ultrasound guidance can help decrease complications of regional blocks.

In the lumbar area, the lumbar paravertebral space is a potential space formed by the vertebral bodies, intervertebral discs and intervertebral foramina medially, the psoas major muscle anterolaterally and the erector spinae muscles, the transverse process and intertransverse ligaments posteriorly. There is no costotransverse ligament in the lumbar region. The lumbar spinal nerve roots run through the paravertebral space then continue through the psoas major muscle where they form the lumbar plexus.The spinal nerves in this space are devoid of a fascial sheath making them exceptionally susceptible to local anesthetics. The diaphragm and psoas muscle separate the thoracic and lumbar paravertebral areas; however, communication may occur via the medial and lateral arcuate ligaments of the diaphragm.

Field block can be done by subcutaneous injection of a local anesthetic in an area bordering on the field to be anesthetized. It is safe, simple, effective, and economical, without post anesthesia side effects. Furthermore, local anesthesia administered before the incision produces longer postoperative analgesia because of local infiltration, theoretically, inhibits the build-up of local nociceptive molecules, and therefore, there is better pain control in the postoperative period.

The aim of this study is to compare the analgesic and autonomic effects of unilateral abdominal ultrasound guided paravertebral block with field block in pediatric inguinal hernia surgery.

This study hypothesizes that unilateral abdominal ultrasound guided paravertebral block may be more superior to field block in reducing intra and postoperative pain in the pediatric inguinal hernia. The analgesic efficacy and duration of ultrasound (US) guided unilateral lumbar paravertebral block and field block were compared when dexmedetomidine and epinephrine were added as adjuvants to bupivacaine.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 60
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• Egypt
  • Dakahlia
    • Mansoura, Dakahlia, Egypt, 35516
      • Mansoura University Children's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 3 years to 8 years (Child)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Patients subjected to an elective unilateral inguinal hernia repair.
2. American Society for Anesthesiologists physical status grades I and II.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Parental refusal. 2. Neuromuscular diseases (as myopathies, myasthenia gravies, etc.) 3. Hematological diseases, bleeding or coagulation abnormality. 4. Psychiatric diseases. 5. Local skin infection and sepsis at the site of the block. 6. Known intolerance to the study drugs.

-

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: Single

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Lumbar paravertebral group; After general anesthesia, the patient is placed prone. To establish the level of the block, we used US-counting of vertebrae. After determining the lumbar one level, the block performed at a parallel line 2 cm lateral to the spinous process, the transducer is moved until the corresponding transverse process is identified. Utilizing an in-plane approach from lateral to medial, a spinal needle is advanced until contact with the transverse process. The needle is withdrawn and redirected caudally under the transverse process helped by the loss of resistance technique. the solution is slowly injected after negative aspiration for blood.	Drug: Lumbar paravertebral group; A mixture of 0.5 ml /kg bupivacaine (0.25%), and 0.5µg/Kg dexmedetomidine and Epinephrine 5 microgram/ ml.
Active Comparator: The field block group; The ilioinguinal nerve block was done at one fingerbreadth from the anterior superior iliac spine in a line with the pubic tubercle, The injection was done after the bob of the needle after passing the external oblique aponeurosis and muscle and 5ml of the solution is injected. The rest of the solution is injected in the incision line.	Drug: The field block group; A mixture of 0.5 ml /kg bupivacaine (0.25%), and 0.5µg/Kg dexmedetomidine and Epinephrine 5 microgram/ ml.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
The total dose of analgesics required in the post-operative periods	Fentanyl in microgram.	24 hours postoperatively

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Modified Faces Legs Activity Cry Consolability Revised pain Scale	pain score of 5 items (Faces, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability) each of 0, 1, or 2 points. 0= express no pain, 1= mild pain, 2= the highest pain indicator. A total score 0 = Relaxed and comfortable. 1-3 = Mild discomfort. 4-6 = Moderate pain. 7-10 = Severe pain.	postoperative at 1, 2, 4, 8,16, 24 hours.
Mean Blood pressure	millimeter mercury	Basal preoperative, during incision, 30 minutes, 60 minutes intraoperatively, postoperative at 1, 2, 4, 8,16, 24 hours.
Heart rate	beat/minutes	Basal preoperative, during incision, 30 minutes, 60 minutes intraoperatively, postoperative at 1, 2, 4, 8,16, 24 hours.
Modified Ramsay sedation scale.	a scale from (1- 6), 1 = anxious; 2 = oriented & tranquil; 3 = sedated, but responds to commands; 4 = asleep, brisk glabellar reflex or response to loud noise; 5 = asleep, slugglish glabellar reflex or response to loud noise; 6 = asleep with no response to painful stimulus	postoperative at 2, 4, 6, 12, 16, 24 hours.
Parents' satisfaction score	in a visual analogue score from (0-10), 0= minimal satisfaction, 10 = the highest satisfaction.	postoperative after 24 hours.
Adverse effects including nausea and vomiting, bradycardia (heart rate less than 60 beat/minute)	percent	postoperatively in the first 24 hours.

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Mansoura University

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): August 9, 2016
• Primary Completion (Actual): August 1, 2017
• Study Completion (Actual): August 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: January 10, 2018
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: January 17, 2018
• First Posted (Actual): January 23, 2018

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): February 1, 2018
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: January 30, 2018
• Last Verified: January 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Pathologic Processes; Postoperative Complications; Pain; Neurologic Manifestations; Pain, Postoperative
• Other Study ID Numbers: MS/16.06.19

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: YES
• IPD Plan Description: after publication
• IPD Sharing Time Frame: no limit
• IPD Sharing Access Criteria: e mail: ayatebrahimeid@gmail.com
• IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type: SAP; CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No