Denne siden ble automatisk oversatt og nøyaktigheten av oversettelsen er ikke garantert. Vennligst referer til engelsk versjon for en kildetekst.

Lumbar Paravertebral in Hernia Surgery

30. januar 2018 oppdatert av: Mansoura University

Comparison Between Lumbar Paravertebral and Field Blocks in Pediatric Inguinal Hernia Surgery.

An inguinal hernia is one of the most common disorders requiring surgical repair in pediatrics. The effective treatment of postoperative pain in infants and children is challenging. Although the use of opioid analgesics is generally safe, adverse effects occur frequently, so the use of alternative analgesic techniques when available to improve postoperative analgesia while limiting opioid-related adverse effects, that is why there is an increase in the use of regional anesthetic techniques in infants and children.

Studieoversikt

Detaljert beskrivelse

Different anesthetic regional techniques can be used for anesthesia and analgesia of the lower abdominal surgeries such as caudal, spinal, epidural, transversus abdominis plane block, ilioinguinal nerve block, lumbar plexus block, the field block and abdominal paravertebral block. The use of regional anesthesia with ultrasound guidance can help decrease complications of regional blocks.

In the lumbar area, the lumbar paravertebral space is a potential space formed by the vertebral bodies, intervertebral discs and intervertebral foramina medially, the psoas major muscle anterolaterally and the erector spinae muscles, the transverse process and intertransverse ligaments posteriorly. There is no costotransverse ligament in the lumbar region. The lumbar spinal nerve roots run through the paravertebral space then continue through the psoas major muscle where they form the lumbar plexus.The spinal nerves in this space are devoid of a fascial sheath making them exceptionally susceptible to local anesthetics. The diaphragm and psoas muscle separate the thoracic and lumbar paravertebral areas; however, communication may occur via the medial and lateral arcuate ligaments of the diaphragm.

Field block can be done by subcutaneous injection of a local anesthetic in an area bordering on the field to be anesthetized. It is safe, simple, effective, and economical, without post anesthesia side effects. Furthermore, local anesthesia administered before the incision produces longer postoperative analgesia because of local infiltration, theoretically, inhibits the build-up of local nociceptive molecules, and therefore, there is better pain control in the postoperative period.

The aim of this study is to compare the analgesic and autonomic effects of unilateral abdominal ultrasound guided paravertebral block with field block in pediatric inguinal hernia surgery.

This study hypothesizes that unilateral abdominal ultrasound guided paravertebral block may be more superior to field block in reducing intra and postoperative pain in the pediatric inguinal hernia. The analgesic efficacy and duration of ultrasound (US) guided unilateral lumbar paravertebral block and field block were compared when dexmedetomidine and epinephrine were added as adjuvants to bupivacaine.

Studietype

Intervensjonell

Registrering (Faktiske)

60

Fase

  • Ikke aktuelt

Kontakter og plasseringer

Denne delen inneholder kontaktinformasjon for de som utfører studien, og informasjon om hvor denne studien blir utført.

Studiesteder

    • Dakahlia
      • Mansoura, Dakahlia, Egypt, 35516
        • Mansoura University Children's Hospital

Deltakelseskriterier

Forskere ser etter personer som passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kalt kvalifikasjonskriterier. Noen eksempler på disse kriteriene er en persons generelle helsetilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Kvalifikasjonskriterier

Alder som er kvalifisert for studier

3 år til 8 år (Barn)

Tar imot friske frivillige

Nei

Kjønn som er kvalifisert for studier

Alle

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients subjected to an elective unilateral inguinal hernia repair.
  2. American Society for Anesthesiologists physical status grades I and II.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Parental refusal. 2. Neuromuscular diseases (as myopathies, myasthenia gravies, etc.) 3. Hematological diseases, bleeding or coagulation abnormality. 4. Psychiatric diseases. 5. Local skin infection and sepsis at the site of the block. 6. Known intolerance to the study drugs.

-

Studieplan

Denne delen gir detaljer om studieplanen, inkludert hvordan studien er utformet og hva studien måler.

Hvordan er studiet utformet?

Designdetaljer

  • Primært formål: Støttende omsorg
  • Tildeling: Randomisert
  • Intervensjonsmodell: Parallell tildeling
  • Masking: Enkelt

Våpen og intervensjoner

Deltakergruppe / Arm
Intervensjon / Behandling
Aktiv komparator: Lumbar paravertebral group
After general anesthesia, the patient is placed prone. To establish the level of the block, we used US-counting of vertebrae. After determining the lumbar one level, the block performed at a parallel line 2 cm lateral to the spinous process, the transducer is moved until the corresponding transverse process is identified. Utilizing an in-plane approach from lateral to medial, a spinal needle is advanced until contact with the transverse process. The needle is withdrawn and redirected caudally under the transverse process helped by the loss of resistance technique. the solution is slowly injected after negative aspiration for blood.
A mixture of 0.5 ml /kg bupivacaine (0.25%), and 0.5µg/Kg dexmedetomidine and Epinephrine 5 microgram/ ml.
Aktiv komparator: The field block group
The ilioinguinal nerve block was done at one fingerbreadth from the anterior superior iliac spine in a line with the pubic tubercle, The injection was done after the bob of the needle after passing the external oblique aponeurosis and muscle and 5ml of the solution is injected. The rest of the solution is injected in the incision line.
A mixture of 0.5 ml /kg bupivacaine (0.25%), and 0.5µg/Kg dexmedetomidine and Epinephrine 5 microgram/ ml.

Hva måler studien?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Tiltaksbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
The total dose of analgesics required in the post-operative periods
Tidsramme: 24 hours postoperatively
Fentanyl in microgram.
24 hours postoperatively

Sekundære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Tiltaksbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Modified Faces Legs Activity Cry Consolability Revised pain Scale
Tidsramme: postoperative at 1, 2, 4, 8,16, 24 hours.
pain score of 5 items (Faces, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability) each of 0, 1, or 2 points. 0= express no pain, 1= mild pain, 2= the highest pain indicator. A total score 0 = Relaxed and comfortable. 1-3 = Mild discomfort. 4-6 = Moderate pain. 7-10 = Severe pain.
postoperative at 1, 2, 4, 8,16, 24 hours.
Mean Blood pressure
Tidsramme: Basal preoperative, during incision, 30 minutes, 60 minutes intraoperatively, postoperative at 1, 2, 4, 8,16, 24 hours.
millimeter mercury
Basal preoperative, during incision, 30 minutes, 60 minutes intraoperatively, postoperative at 1, 2, 4, 8,16, 24 hours.
Heart rate
Tidsramme: Basal preoperative, during incision, 30 minutes, 60 minutes intraoperatively, postoperative at 1, 2, 4, 8,16, 24 hours.
beat/minutes
Basal preoperative, during incision, 30 minutes, 60 minutes intraoperatively, postoperative at 1, 2, 4, 8,16, 24 hours.
Modified Ramsay sedation scale.
Tidsramme: postoperative at 2, 4, 6, 12, 16, 24 hours.
a scale from (1- 6), 1 = anxious; 2 = oriented & tranquil; 3 = sedated, but responds to commands; 4 = asleep, brisk glabellar reflex or response to loud noise; 5 = asleep, slugglish glabellar reflex or response to loud noise; 6 = asleep with no response to painful stimulus
postoperative at 2, 4, 6, 12, 16, 24 hours.
Parents' satisfaction score
Tidsramme: postoperative after 24 hours.
in a visual analogue score from (0-10), 0= minimal satisfaction, 10 = the highest satisfaction.
postoperative after 24 hours.
Adverse effects including nausea and vomiting, bradycardia (heart rate less than 60 beat/minute)
Tidsramme: postoperatively in the first 24 hours.
percent
postoperatively in the first 24 hours.

Samarbeidspartnere og etterforskere

Det er her du vil finne personer og organisasjoner som er involvert i denne studien.

Studierekorddatoer

Disse datoene sporer fremdriften for innsending av studieposter og sammendragsresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieposter og rapporterte resultater gjennomgås av National Library of Medicine (NLM) for å sikre at de oppfyller spesifikke kvalitetskontrollstandarder før de legges ut på det offentlige nettstedet.

Studer hoveddatoer

Studiestart (Faktiske)

9. august 2016

Primær fullføring (Faktiske)

1. august 2017

Studiet fullført (Faktiske)

1. august 2017

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først innsendt

10. januar 2018

Først innsendt som oppfylte QC-kriteriene

17. januar 2018

Først lagt ut (Faktiske)

23. januar 2018

Oppdateringer av studieposter

Sist oppdatering lagt ut (Faktiske)

1. februar 2018

Siste oppdatering sendt inn som oppfylte QC-kriteriene

30. januar 2018

Sist bekreftet

1. januar 2018

Mer informasjon

Begreper knyttet til denne studien

Andre studie-ID-numre

  • MS/16.06.19

Plan for individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)

Planlegger du å dele individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)?

JA

IPD-planbeskrivelse

after publication

IPD-delingstidsramme

no limit

Tilgangskriterier for IPD-deling

e mail: ayatebrahimeid@gmail.com

IPD-deling Støtteinformasjonstype

  • SEVJE
  • CSR

Legemiddel- og utstyrsinformasjon, studiedokumenter

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert medikamentprodukt

Nei

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert enhetsprodukt

Nei

Denne informasjonen ble hentet direkte fra nettstedet clinicaltrials.gov uten noen endringer. Hvis du har noen forespørsler om å endre, fjerne eller oppdatere studiedetaljene dine, vennligst kontakt register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en endring er implementert på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også bli oppdatert automatisk på nettstedet vårt. .

Kliniske studier på Postoperativ smerte

Kliniske studier på Lumbar paravertebral group

Abonnere