- ICH GCP
- Registre américain des essais cliniques
- Essai clinique NCT03408184
Lumbar Paravertebral in Hernia Surgery
Comparison Between Lumbar Paravertebral and Field Blocks in Pediatric Inguinal Hernia Surgery.
Aperçu de l'étude
Statut
Les conditions
Intervention / Traitement
Description détaillée
Different anesthetic regional techniques can be used for anesthesia and analgesia of the lower abdominal surgeries such as caudal, spinal, epidural, transversus abdominis plane block, ilioinguinal nerve block, lumbar plexus block, the field block and abdominal paravertebral block. The use of regional anesthesia with ultrasound guidance can help decrease complications of regional blocks.
In the lumbar area, the lumbar paravertebral space is a potential space formed by the vertebral bodies, intervertebral discs and intervertebral foramina medially, the psoas major muscle anterolaterally and the erector spinae muscles, the transverse process and intertransverse ligaments posteriorly. There is no costotransverse ligament in the lumbar region. The lumbar spinal nerve roots run through the paravertebral space then continue through the psoas major muscle where they form the lumbar plexus.The spinal nerves in this space are devoid of a fascial sheath making them exceptionally susceptible to local anesthetics. The diaphragm and psoas muscle separate the thoracic and lumbar paravertebral areas; however, communication may occur via the medial and lateral arcuate ligaments of the diaphragm.
Field block can be done by subcutaneous injection of a local anesthetic in an area bordering on the field to be anesthetized. It is safe, simple, effective, and economical, without post anesthesia side effects. Furthermore, local anesthesia administered before the incision produces longer postoperative analgesia because of local infiltration, theoretically, inhibits the build-up of local nociceptive molecules, and therefore, there is better pain control in the postoperative period.
The aim of this study is to compare the analgesic and autonomic effects of unilateral abdominal ultrasound guided paravertebral block with field block in pediatric inguinal hernia surgery.
This study hypothesizes that unilateral abdominal ultrasound guided paravertebral block may be more superior to field block in reducing intra and postoperative pain in the pediatric inguinal hernia. The analgesic efficacy and duration of ultrasound (US) guided unilateral lumbar paravertebral block and field block were compared when dexmedetomidine and epinephrine were added as adjuvants to bupivacaine.
Type d'étude
Inscription (Réel)
Phase
- N'est pas applicable
Contacts et emplacements
Lieux d'étude
-
-
Dakahlia
-
Mansoura, Dakahlia, Egypte, 35516
- Mansoura University Children's Hospital
-
-
Critères de participation
Critère d'éligibilité
Âges éligibles pour étudier
Accepte les volontaires sains
Sexes éligibles pour l'étude
La description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients subjected to an elective unilateral inguinal hernia repair.
- American Society for Anesthesiologists physical status grades I and II.
Exclusion Criteria:
1. Parental refusal. 2. Neuromuscular diseases (as myopathies, myasthenia gravies, etc.) 3. Hematological diseases, bleeding or coagulation abnormality. 4. Psychiatric diseases. 5. Local skin infection and sepsis at the site of the block. 6. Known intolerance to the study drugs.
-
Plan d'étude
Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?
Détails de conception
- Objectif principal: Soins de soutien
- Répartition: Randomisé
- Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
- Masquage: Seul
Armes et Interventions
Groupe de participants / Bras |
Intervention / Traitement |
---|---|
Comparateur actif: Lumbar paravertebral group
After general anesthesia, the patient is placed prone.
To establish the level of the block, we used US-counting of vertebrae.
After determining the lumbar one level, the block performed at a parallel line 2 cm lateral to the spinous process, the transducer is moved until the corresponding transverse process is identified.
Utilizing an in-plane approach from lateral to medial, a spinal needle is advanced until contact with the transverse process.
The needle is withdrawn and redirected caudally under the transverse process helped by the loss of resistance technique.
the solution is slowly injected after negative aspiration for blood.
|
A mixture of 0.5 ml /kg bupivacaine (0.25%), and 0.5µg/Kg dexmedetomidine and Epinephrine 5 microgram/ ml.
|
Comparateur actif: The field block group
The ilioinguinal nerve block was done at one fingerbreadth from the anterior superior iliac spine in a line with the pubic tubercle, The injection was done after the bob of the needle after passing the external oblique aponeurosis and muscle and 5ml of the solution is injected.
The rest of the solution is injected in the incision line.
|
A mixture of 0.5 ml /kg bupivacaine (0.25%), and 0.5µg/Kg dexmedetomidine and Epinephrine 5 microgram/ ml.
|
Que mesure l'étude ?
Principaux critères de jugement
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
---|---|---|
The total dose of analgesics required in the post-operative periods
Délai: 24 hours postoperatively
|
Fentanyl in microgram.
|
24 hours postoperatively
|
Mesures de résultats secondaires
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
---|---|---|
Modified Faces Legs Activity Cry Consolability Revised pain Scale
Délai: postoperative at 1, 2, 4, 8,16, 24 hours.
|
pain score of 5 items (Faces, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability) each of 0, 1, or 2 points.
0= express no pain, 1= mild pain, 2= the highest pain indicator.
A total score 0 = Relaxed and comfortable.
1-3 = Mild discomfort.
4-6 = Moderate pain.
7-10 = Severe pain.
|
postoperative at 1, 2, 4, 8,16, 24 hours.
|
Mean Blood pressure
Délai: Basal preoperative, during incision, 30 minutes, 60 minutes intraoperatively, postoperative at 1, 2, 4, 8,16, 24 hours.
|
millimeter mercury
|
Basal preoperative, during incision, 30 minutes, 60 minutes intraoperatively, postoperative at 1, 2, 4, 8,16, 24 hours.
|
Heart rate
Délai: Basal preoperative, during incision, 30 minutes, 60 minutes intraoperatively, postoperative at 1, 2, 4, 8,16, 24 hours.
|
beat/minutes
|
Basal preoperative, during incision, 30 minutes, 60 minutes intraoperatively, postoperative at 1, 2, 4, 8,16, 24 hours.
|
Modified Ramsay sedation scale.
Délai: postoperative at 2, 4, 6, 12, 16, 24 hours.
|
a scale from (1- 6), 1 = anxious; 2 = oriented & tranquil; 3 = sedated, but responds to commands; 4 = asleep, brisk glabellar reflex or response to loud noise; 5 = asleep, slugglish glabellar reflex or response to loud noise; 6 = asleep with no response to painful stimulus
|
postoperative at 2, 4, 6, 12, 16, 24 hours.
|
Parents' satisfaction score
Délai: postoperative after 24 hours.
|
in a visual analogue score from (0-10), 0= minimal satisfaction, 10 = the highest satisfaction.
|
postoperative after 24 hours.
|
Adverse effects including nausea and vomiting, bradycardia (heart rate less than 60 beat/minute)
Délai: postoperatively in the first 24 hours.
|
percent
|
postoperatively in the first 24 hours.
|
Collaborateurs et enquêteurs
Parrainer
Dates d'enregistrement des études
Dates principales de l'étude
Début de l'étude (Réel)
Achèvement primaire (Réel)
Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)
Dates d'inscription aux études
Première soumission
Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Première publication (Réel)
Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude
Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)
Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Dernière vérification
Plus d'information
Termes liés à cette étude
Termes MeSH pertinents supplémentaires
Autres numéros d'identification d'étude
- MS/16.06.19
Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)
Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?
Description du régime IPD
Délai de partage IPD
Critères d'accès au partage IPD
Type d'informations de prise en charge du partage d'IPD
- SÈVE
- RSE
Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude
Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine
Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine
Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .
Essais cliniques sur Douleur postopératoire
-
Evergrain, LLCINQUIS Clinical Research Ltd.ComplétéSatiété du pain riche en fibres et riche en protéinesCanada
-
Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical CenterWeizmann Institute of ScienceComplétéChangements de poids corporel | Modification alimentaire | Microbiote gastro-intestinal | Pain | Tests hématologiquesIsraël
-
Ege UniversityComplétéObésité | Index glycémique | Glucose sanguin | PainTurquie
-
University of BergenUniversity of Leipzig; Chalmers University of Technology; Nofima; Paderborn UniversityComplétéHyperglycémie | Prédiabète | Contrôle glycémique | PainNorvège
Essais cliniques sur Lumbar paravertebral group
-
University of LisbonAssociacao Protectora dos Diabeticos de PortugalComplété
-
University Hospital, BrestPas encore de recrutement
-
Children's National Research InstituteComplétéFormation sur la sécurité des sièges d'auto pour enfantsÉtats-Unis
-
Aarhus University HospitalUniversity of AarhusComplétéCancer du sein féminin | Peur de la récidive du cancerDanemark
-
Arizona Oncology ServicesInconnueCancer du sein localisé | Cancer localisé de la prostate | Patients recevant une radiothérapie externeÉtats-Unis
-
hearX GroupUniversity of PretoriaComplété
-
Montefiore Medical CenterThe FAR FundComplétéParentalité | Relation parent-enfantÉtats-Unis
-
Boston Children's HospitalComplétéStress, Psychologique | Problème d'acculturationÉtats-Unis
-
University of South FloridaNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Recrutement
-
Amsterdam UMC, location VUmcRed Cross Hospital BeverwijkComplétéCicatrice hypertrophique | ChéloïdePays-Bas