Evaluation of Different Protein Content of Formulas on Nutrition Status of Infants.

April 19, 2018 updated by: Olga Patricia García Obregon, Universidad Autonoma de Queretaro

Evaluation of the Impact of Infant Formulas With Different Protein Content on Growth, Gastrointestinal Tolerance, and B-casomorphin Concentration of Infants.

Human milk (HM) is the gold standard of early infant nutrition. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommend that newborns be exclusively breastfed for the first 6 months of life. It has beed reported that an exclusive breast feeding at 6 months of age range from 10 to 46%. Thus, the intake of infant formulas (IF) is quite widespread, including infants that have less than 6 months that are not receiving breast milk. Most of the commercial IF are cow's milk-based formulas that have a higher concentration of protein than breast milk and have a different protein composition. Commercial IF have a low proportion of alpha lactoalbumin, and A1 β-casein; during its digestion, a β-casomorphin 7 peptide is produced. In addition, it has a high concentration of β-lactoglobulin. Both, β-casomorphin 7 and β-lactoglobulin have been associated with a higher risk of diabetes obesity and allergies. Human β-casein does not produce β-casomorphin 7 during its digestion, it has a high concentration of alpha-lactoalbumin and does not have β-lactoglobulin.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate growth, gastrointestinal tolerance, and β-casomorphin 7 in urine of infants that are exclusively breastfed compared to infants fed three IF with different proteint content.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Developing an IF with A2 β-casein, high proportion of alpha-lactoalbumin and less protein that commercial IF, similar to breast milk (1g/100 mL), could be and important strategy to decrease the risk of diseases. This infant formula was compared with breast milk and two other IF with different protein composition. The three formulas were packed in the same presentation and identified by a number. Mothers voluntarily elected to exclusively breast-feed or formula-feed her newborn. the present study

Infants' mothers were recruited from six health centers from the Health Ministry in Querétaro, México. Directors of each health center authorized the protocol study. The field workers were read and explained the informed consent letter, the objectives, procedures, risks and benefits of the study in detail.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Queretaro
      • Querétaro City, Queretaro, Mexico, 76230
        • Universidad Autonoma de Queretaro

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

1 day to 1 month (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Full-term newborn (≥37 weeks of gestation)
  • Birth weight ≥2500 g and ≤4000 g
  • Apgar score > 8
  • Infants from birth to 40 days of age at the time of enrollment
  • Mothers voluntarily elected to exclusively breast-feed or formula-feed her newborn.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Infants with congenital heart defect, congenital illness or malformations, severe gastrointestinal disease, kidney, liver, central nervous system, or metabolic disease, or born from mothers with gestational diabetes.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: IF-VLP (very low protein)
Participants were exclusively fed with an infant formula containing 1g of protein/dL, 26% alpha lactoalbumin, and 100% A2 casein for 4 months.
Other: IF-LP (low protein)
Participants were exclusively fed with an infant formula containing 1.3 g of protein/dL, 26% alpha lactoalbumin, 100% A2 casein for 4 months.
Other: IF-CSP (control standard protein)
Participants were exclusively fed with an infant formula containing 1.5 g of protein/dL, 50% A1 casein and 50% A2 casein for 4 months.
No Intervention: HM (human milk)
Participants were exclusively breastfed

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in weight
Time Frame: Baseline to 4 months of age
Weight
Baseline to 4 months of age

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Anthropometry measurements
Time Frame: Baseline, 1, 2 ,3 and 4 months of age
Measurements will include length and head circumference, and together with the primary outcome of weight, will be used to calculate z-scores using WHO Growth Standards.
Baseline, 1, 2 ,3 and 4 months of age
Beta-casomorphin 7 concentration
Time Frame: Baseline and at 4 months of age
Quantification of beta-casomorphin 7 concentration in urine
Baseline and at 4 months of age
Number of gastrointestinal events
Time Frame: Baseline, 1, 2, 3, and 4 months
Gastrointestinal events will be recorded by the mothers. These events include: constipation, diarrhea, regurgitation, vomit, reflux, colic, constant crying, and stool consistency and color, using previously reported scales (Bekkali et al, 2009; Trabulsi, 2011).
Baseline, 1, 2, 3, and 4 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Olga P García, PhD, Universidad Autonoma de Queretaro

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 15, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 8, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

August 8, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 10, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 19, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

May 2, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 2, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 19, 2018

Last Verified

April 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe