Quality of Life in Patients With Multimetastatic Melanoma Currently in Remission (QUALM) (QUALM)

July 18, 2018 updated by: Lille Catholic University

Evaluation of the Quality of Life in Patients With Multimetastatic Melanoma Currently in Remission

Few studies have been conducted on the quality of life of patients with stage IV melanoma. Particularly, there is no data regarding the quality of life of patients with a multimetastatic melanoma currently in remission.

Then, the main objective of this study is to evaluate the quality of life from a point of view medico-psycho-social in patients with multimetastatic melanoma in remission for more than 6 months.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The cutaneous melanoma, (9th rank of all cancers), was until recently neglected and poorly known by the general public. The metastatic stages have dramatic rates of survival: 25% at 1 year and 2% at 5 years with a median of about 6.2 months. However, in the last ten years, the treatment of metastatic forms has undergone a real revolution.

Its high metastatic potential for a very low initial tumor mass, gives evidence of a great aggressiveness. The cutaneous melanoma is resistant to the main therapeutics (chemotherapy and radiotherapy). Thanks to the emergence of immunotherapies and targeted therapies anti-RAF (Rapidly Accelerated Fibrosarcoma) and anti-MEK (Mitogen-activated Extracellular) the prognosis of patients with metastatic melanoma has considerably improved, increasing the number of "long-term survivors".

However, these treatments can cause many adverse effects that can impact patients' quality of life, despite a better tolerance compared to conventional chemotherapies. To our knowledge there are no data regarding the quality of life of patients with metastatic melanoma currently in remission.For this purpose, it is necessary to obtain solid data using validated questionnaires. Thus, we have chosen to evaluate quality of life using specific questionnaires to better understand patients' expectations, their difficulties, and then to improve the relationship between the patient and the physician.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Nord
      • Lille, Nord, France, 59037
        • CHRU Lille
      • Lille, Nord, France, 59020
        • Lille Catholic Hospitals

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with multimetastatic melanoma currently in remission

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients
  • Presenting a stage IV melanoma of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) classification (multimetastatic) in remission for more than 6 months:
  • Complete remission (defined as the complete disappearance of target lesions according to the RECIST criteria, based on a thoraco-abdomino-pelvic CT scan and a brain Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or
  • Complete metabolic remission (defined as the complete disappearance of target lesions in PET CT (positron emission tomography computed tomograph, that is to say, disappearance of the hypermetabolic character of the anatomic structures. There may remain target lesions in conventional CT but they are not hypermetabolic in PET CT)
  • Patients able to answer the questionnaires
  • Patients with enough understanding of the French language

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Adjuvant treatment
  • Patient under tutorship or curatorship
  • Refusal to participate in the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Multimetastatic melanoma in remission
Questionnaires
FACT-M (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Melanoma) questionnaire, MOS SF (medical outcome study short form) -36 questionnaire

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of life assessed by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Melanoma (FACT-M) questionnaire
Time Frame: day 0

The FACT-M questionnaire is a specific quality of life scale for patients treated for melanoma. It includes 51 items grouped into nine multi-item scores: six subscale scores and three summary scores.

The six subscales consist of four subscales from the FACT-G:

  • physical well-being [PWB], score range: 0-28, higher values represent a worse outcome.
  • social well-being [SWB], score range: 0-28, higher values represent a better outcome.
  • emotional well-being [EWB], score range: 0-24, higher values represent a worse outcome.
  • functional well-being [FWB]), score range: 0-28, higher values represent a better outcome.

One Melanoma scale, score range: 0-64, higher values represent a worse outcome. One Melanoma surgery scale, score range: 0-32, higher values represent a worse outcome.

The three summary scores include:

  • the FACT-M Trial Outcome Index (TOI), score range: 0-120
  • the FACT-G total score, score range: 0-108
  • the FACT-M total score, score range: 0-172
day 0
Health status surveyed by the Medical Outcome Study Short Form - 36 (MOS SF 36) questionnaire
Time Frame: day 0

The SF-36 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability.

The eight sections are:

  • vitality
  • physical functioning
  • bodily pain
  • general health perceptions
  • physical role functioning
  • emotional role functioning
  • social role functioning
  • mental health
day 0

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Aurore Le Guern, Lille Catholic University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

April 9, 2018

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

June 5, 2018

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

June 5, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 25, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 25, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

May 8, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

July 19, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 18, 2018

Last Verified

July 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Remission

Clinical Trials on Questionnaires

3
Subscribe