Assessment of Pulpotomy Procedure Using NeoMTA Plus in Permanent Teeth With Carious Exposure (PULPOTOMY)

September 15, 2021 updated by: Jordan University of Science and Technology
Many deep carious teeth are treated unnecessarily by root canal therapy, while with using current techniques and advances in compatible dental materials in addition to better understanding of biological response of the dental pulp, many can be treated conservatively via vital pulp therapy procedures.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Vital pulp therapy is recommended for teeth diagnosed with reversible pulpitis or partially inflamed pulps in which the remaining healthy tissue can be conserved and protected by a biologically active material to generate a hard tissue barrier that seals and protects the pulp from future microbial insult.

The aim of this in vivo study is to clinically and radiographically assess the outcome of full pulpotomy using a calcium silicate based material (NeoMTA Plus) in permanent teeth with carious exposure.

Ethics approval was obtained from the institutional ethics and research committee, and the patients were informed about details of the treatment and the possible complications. An informed consent was obtained. 120 patients meeting the inclusion criteria will be selected for this study and they will be subsequently followed up clinically and radiographically after 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and yearly afterward for 5 years.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

109

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Irbid, Jordan, 22110
        • Jordan University of Science and Technology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

7 years to 80 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT, CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Permanent teeth with mature or immature apices
  • Have no significant medical problems
  • The tooth should give positive response to cold test and electric pulp test (EPT)
  • Probing pocket depth and mobility within normal limits
  • No Signs of pulp necrosis including sinus tract or swelling
  • Radiographically ; caries either exposing the pulps or reaching more than 2\3 the distance from the dentino-enamel junction (DEJ) to the pulp
  • The tooth can be restored via direct restoration

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Medically compromised patients
  • Negative response to cold test
  • Mobility
  • Sinus tract
  • Swelling
  • Non restorable teeth or badly broken teeth

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Patients with carious teeth
female or male patients with permanent teeth and deep caries will receive pulpotomy treatment and dressing with calcium silicate based material (Neo MTA plus material) followed by restoration.
Its a dental pulp capping material which is biocompatable and induces hard tissue barrier formation
Other Names:
  • Neo MTA plus, Avalon Biomed

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in pain symptoms
Time Frame: 2-3 days after the treatment, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months and afterwards up to 5 years.
The patient is anticipated to report reduction in the pain score after receiving the treatment within 2-3 days and the tooth should continue to be asymptomatic at follow up appointments. The patient will be asked to score the pain level on visual analogue scale using a score from 0-10. The zero is no pain while 10 is the maximum level.
2-3 days after the treatment, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months and afterwards up to 5 years.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Periapical normalcy at follow up radiographs .
Time Frame: 6months , 1 year, 2, 3,4,5 years

Pr-existing pathology should heal within 6 months- 1 year and normalcy should be maintained after ward up to 5 years.

no emerging pathosis should be evident in the roots or surrounding bone.

6months , 1 year, 2, 3,4,5 years
The tooth and restoration should be present in the mouth
Time Frame: 3, 6 months, 1 year, 2, 3,4,5 years
The tooth should be in the mouth and in function (not extracted) with an intact restoration at the follow up times
3, 6 months, 1 year, 2, 3,4,5 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Nessrin A Taha, PhD, Jordan University of Science and Technology

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

December 1, 2016

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

June 1, 2019

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

August 20, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 19, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 29, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

May 11, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

September 16, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 15, 2021

Last Verified

September 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Baseline demographic data and follow-up results may be shared after manuscript acceptance by international journals

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe