Effectiveness & Implementation of a Behavioral Intervention for Adherence and Substance Use in HIV Care in South Africa

May 16, 2022 updated by: Jessica Magidson, University of Maryland, College Park

Hybrid Effectiveness-Implementation Trial for ART Adherence and Substance Use in HIV Care in South Africa

The purpose of this study is to test the effectiveness and implementation of a brief, integrated behavioral intervention for HIV medication adherence and substance use in the HIV care setting in South Africa. The intervention is specifically designed to be implemented by non-specialist counselors using a task sharing model in local HIV clinics. The behavioral intervention will be compared to usual care, enhanced with referral to a local outpatient substance use treatment program (Enhanced Standard of Care - ESOC) on study endpoints (as described in study endpoint section below).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The HIV epidemic in South Africa (SA) is among the highest in the world. SA has a large antiretroviral therapy (ART) program, but some individuals exhibit poor ART adherence, which increases the likelihood of developing drug resistance and failing the only available first and second line ART regimens in SA. ART nonadherence contributes to greater morbidity, mortality, and higher likelihood of sexual HIV transmission when virus is detectable. At the same time, alcohol and other drug use is prevalent among HIV-infected individuals in SA and associated with worse ART adherence, lower rates of viral suppression, and HIV transmission risk behavior. Yet, despite the impact of untreated substance use on poor HIV treatment outcomes and continued HIV transmission, there is little if any integration of substance use and HIV care services in SA, which creates a fragmented and incomplete system of care. This study had three phases, first being formative, qualitative work which led to a systematic treatment adaptation phase. This third phase, the clinical trial, is based on this formative work and other empirical support using behavioral interventions to improve ART adherence and reduce substance use in resource-limited settings, including SA. This study is a Type 1 hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial of a lay counselor-delivered behavioral intervention for adherence and substance use integrated into the HIV primary care setting in SA. To ensure that those who need this intervention most will receive it, participants will be patients with HIV who are struggling with adherence (as defined in the investigator's inclusion criteria) and who have an elevated substance use risk.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

66

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Cape Town, South Africa, 7700
        • University of Cape Town
    • Maryland
      • College Park, Maryland, United States, 20742
        • University of Maryland

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • HIV positive and on ART
  • 18-65 years of age
  • Elevated substance use risk (ASSIST score greater than or equal to 4 for drugs or greater than or equal to 11 for alcohol)
  • Have at least one of the following:

    1. Not attained viral suppression from first line ART (VL>400 copies/mL)
    2. On second-line ART treatment
    3. Reinitiated first-line treatment within the past three months
    4. Had a pharmacy non-refill at least once in the past 3 months

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to provide informed consent or complete procedures in English or isiXhosa
  • Severe risk/likely dependence for opiates (ASSIST score >26) because opiate substitution therapy may not be available
  • Severe alcohol dependence symptoms that may warrant medical management of potential withdrawal symptoms
  • Active, untreated, major mental illness (with untreated psychosis or mania) that would interfere with the paraprofessional adapted intervention

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Project Khanya
Those assigned to Project Khanya (the behavioral intervention for substance use and adherence condition) will have approximately 6 sessions (including Life-Steps, behavioral activation, and relapse prevention) delivered by a peer interventionist plus standard of care, which is typically referral to a local outpatient substance use treatment clinic. They will also receive a Wisepill, a wireless, real-time adherence monitoring device.
This treatment involves integrating a behavioral intervention for substance use with a behavioral intervention for adherence.
No Intervention: ESOC
Those assigned to the ESOC (enhanced standard of care) condition will receive the standard of care, which is referral to a local substance use treatment clinic. The substance use clinics in the location that this study occurs follow the Matrix, and evidence-based 16-week outpatient program to treat substance use. We will enhance patients' normal referral to Matrix for ESOC participants by promoting facilitating and following up on the referral. Additionally, those in the control group will also receive a Wisepill, a wireless adherence monitoring device.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in HIV Medication Adherence Throughout Intervention Phase
Time Frame: Assessed between baseline assessment and the acute outcome (approximately 12-weeks post-randomization/ post-intervention assessment)
Percentage of prescribed antiviral therapy agent (medications) taken as measured by real time wireless motoring device
Assessed between baseline assessment and the acute outcome (approximately 12-weeks post-randomization/ post-intervention assessment)
Biological Measure of Substance Use
Time Frame: Assessed at the acute outcome (approximately 12-weeks post-randomization/ post-intervention assessment)
Substance use measured with urinalysis.
Assessed at the acute outcome (approximately 12-weeks post-randomization/ post-intervention assessment)
Biological Measure of Substance Use
Time Frame: Assessed at the acute outcome (approximately 12-weeks post-randomization/ post-intervention assessment)
Substance use measured with phosphatidylethanol (PEth) concentration, which is an objective biomarker of alcohol use that can detect blood collected up to 21 days after alcohol consumption. Minimum detection value is 8 ng/mL. Higher PEth values indicate greater concentration of alcohol. Values of ≥ 50 ng/mL indicate unhealthy drinking.
Assessed at the acute outcome (approximately 12-weeks post-randomization/ post-intervention assessment)
Changes in Self-reported Substance Use
Time Frame: Assessed between baseline assessment and the acute outcome (approximately 12-weeks post-randomization/ post-intervention assessment)
World Health Organization Alcohol, Smoking, and Substance Involvement Screening Test (WHO-ASSIST). It is a measure used to assess substance use risk for alcohol, cannabis, cocaine, opiates, and amphetamines, hallucinogens, and other drugs. Standardized cutoff scores are used to categorize risk levels: low risk (0-3 for illicit drugs/0-10 for alcohol), moderate risk (4-26 for illicit drugs/11-26 for alcohol), or high risk (> 26) for substance use-related problems.
Assessed between baseline assessment and the acute outcome (approximately 12-weeks post-randomization/ post-intervention assessment)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Biological Measure of Substance Use
Time Frame: Assessed at follow-up (approximately 24-weeks post-randomization/ 6-month follow-up assessment)
Substance use measured with urinalysis.
Assessed at follow-up (approximately 24-weeks post-randomization/ 6-month follow-up assessment)
Biological Measure of Substance Use
Time Frame: Assessed at follow-up (approximately 24-weeks post-randomization/ 6-month follow-up assessment)
Substance use measured with phosphatidylethanol (PEth) concentration, which is an objective biomarker of alcohol use that can detect blood collected up to 21 days after alcohol consumption. Minimum detection value is 8 ng/mL. Higher PEth values indicate greater concentration of alcohol. Values of ≥ 50 ng/mL indicate unhealthy drinking.
Assessed at follow-up (approximately 24-weeks post-randomization/ 6-month follow-up assessment)
Changes in Self-reported Substance Use
Time Frame: Assessed between baseline assessment and follow-up (approximately 24-weeks post-randomization/ 6-month follow-up assessment)
World Health Organization Alcohol, Smoking, and Substance Involvement Screening Test (WHO-ASSIST). It is a measure used to assess substance use risk for alcohol, cannabis, cocaine, opiates, and amphetamines, hallucinogens, and other drugs. Standardized cutoff scores are used to categorize risk levels: low risk (0-3 for illicit drugs/0-10 for alcohol), moderate risk (4-26 for illicit drugs/11-26 for alcohol), or high risk (> 26) for substance use-related problems.
Assessed between baseline assessment and follow-up (approximately 24-weeks post-randomization/ 6-month follow-up assessment)
Intervention Acceptability
Time Frame: Assessed at the acute outcome (approximately 12-weeks post-randomization/ post-intervention assessment)

15-item acceptability subscale of a pragmatic, quantitative assessment based on RE-AIM developed by the Applied Mental Health Research group (AMHR) at Johns Hopkins University. Total scores are averaged across all items and range from 0 to 3. Higher scores indicate greater acceptability.

Qualitative interviews will also be conducted with intervention participants at the end of the study to assess acceptability guided by RE-AIM and the Proctor model.

Assessed at the acute outcome (approximately 12-weeks post-randomization/ post-intervention assessment)
Intervention Feasibility
Time Frame: Assessed at the acute outcome (approximately 12-weeks post-randomization/ post-intervention assessment)

14-item feasibility subscale of a pragmatic, quantitative assessment based on RE-AIM developed by the Applied Mental Health Research group (AMHR) at Johns Hopkins University. Total scores are averaged across all items and range from 0 to 3. Higher scores indicate greater feasibility.

Qualitative interviews will also be conducted with intervention participants at the end of the study to assess feasibility guided by RE-AIM and the Proctor model.

Assessed at the acute outcome (approximately 12-weeks post-randomization/ post-intervention assessment)
Intervention Fidelity
Time Frame: Assessed between randomization and the acute outcome (approximately 12-weeks post-randomization/ post-intervention assessment)
Independent fidelity ratings of a randomly selected subset (20%) of intervention sessions using a fidelity assessment developed for each session that includes 15-19 items that map onto each core intervention component, and factors unique to the peer delivery implementation strategy (i.e., appropriate self-disclosure, stigmatizing behaviors, common factors including warmth and non-judgment).
Assessed between randomization and the acute outcome (approximately 12-weeks post-randomization/ post-intervention assessment)
Intervention Uptake
Time Frame: Assessed between randomization and the acute outcome (approximately 12-weeks post-randomization/ post-intervention assessment)
Intervention participant attendance and retention (i.e., the mean number of intervention sessions attended by intervention participants)
Assessed between randomization and the acute outcome (approximately 12-weeks post-randomization/ post-intervention assessment)

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
HIV Viral Load
Time Frame: Assessed at follow-up (approximately 24-weeks post-randomization/ 6-month follow-up assessment)
Percentage of patients with a suppressed viral load (<400 copies/ml)
Assessed at follow-up (approximately 24-weeks post-randomization/ 6-month follow-up assessment)
Changes in Self-reported Substance Use
Time Frame: Assessed between baseline assessment and follow-up (approximately 24-weeks post-randomization/ 6-month follow-up assessment)
Changes in percent days used any substance measured by timeline follow-back
Assessed between baseline assessment and follow-up (approximately 24-weeks post-randomization/ 6-month follow-up assessment)
Changes in Self-reported Substance Use
Time Frame: Assessed between baseline assessment and follow-up (approximately 24-weeks post-randomization/ 6-month follow-up assessment)
Changes in number of drinks measured by timeline follow-back
Assessed between baseline assessment and follow-up (approximately 24-weeks post-randomization/ 6-month follow-up assessment)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 30, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 12, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

April 7, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 7, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 17, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

May 18, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 18, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 16, 2022

Last Verified

May 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

After all primary analyses are complete, de-identified data will be available per request of outside individual.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Alcohol-Related Disorders

Clinical Trials on Project Khanya

3
Subscribe