Promoting Early School Readiness in Primary Health Care

November 27, 2019 updated by: NYU Langone Health

This project will measure the degree to which parenting programs based in pediatric primary care can be effective in promoting language development and school readiness in at-risk young children.

The study is a randomized controlled trial in which two different primary care-based parenting programs will be compared to a control group in a population that is at risk on the basis of poverty. The two programs represent varying levels of low intensity, but each has the same goals: enhancing parent-child interaction in order to improve language, cognitive and social-emotional development and ultimately promote school readiness and school performance.

One program is called the "Video Interaction Project". While waiting to see the primary care provider for well child care, the family meets with a child development specialist, who videotapes the parent and infant interacting together. The videotape is then rewound and watched together by the parent (and infant!) and child development specialist. This leads to a discussion about child development, infant cues and parenting, with the child development specialist building on observed strengths in the interaction. In addition, families are provided with parenting pamphlets developed for the project, and with inexpensive developmentally stimulating toys.

The other program is called the "ASQ-Building Blocks Project". This project employs a public health approach to facilitate parental engagement in child development. Families are sent monthly newsletters that focus on child development, infant cues and parenting; included with each newsletter is an inexpensive, developmentally stimulating toy. In addition, families periodically receive Ages and Stages Questionnaires, which they complete and mail back to the program. Based on the questionnaires, the program determines whether the infant has screened positive for possible developmental delay and provides this information to both the family and the primary care provider.

This study will test 2 hypotheses:

  1. Primary care based parenting interventions can impact parent-child interaction, early child development and school readiness.
  2. Interventions of differing intensity will have impacts of differing magnitude depending on the risk level of the family.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This project will measure the degree to which parenting programs based in pediatric primary care can be effective in promoting language development and school readiness in at-risk young children. The study will represent a collaboration between the Department of Pediatrics at New York University School of Medicine - Bellevue Hospital Center, the Medical and Health Research Association of New York City, Inc., and the Center for Research on Culture, Development and Education at New York University Steinhardt School of Education. Initial funding was provided by NICHD for 4 years. NICHD provided 5 additional years of competing renewal funding beginning in July, 2010.

The study is a randomized controlled trial in which two different primary care-based parenting programs will be compared to a control group in a population that is at risk on the basis of poverty. The two programs represent varying levels of low intensity, but each has the same goals: enhancing parent-child interaction in order to improve language, cognitive and social-emotional development and ultimately promote school readiness and school performance.

One program is called the "Video Interaction Project". While waiting to see the primary care provider for well child care, the family meets with a child development specialist, who videotapes the parent and infant interacting together. The videotape is then rewound and watched together by the parent and child development specialist. This leads to a discussion about child development, infant cues and parenting, with the child development specialist building on observed strengths in the interaction. In addition, families are provided with parenting pamphlets developed for the project, and with inexpensive developmentally stimulating toys.

The other program is called the "ASQ-Building Blocks Project". This project employs a public health approach to facilitate parental engagement in child development. Families are sent monthly newsletters that focus on child development, infant cues and parenting; included with each newsletter is an inexpensive, developmentally stimulating toy. In addition, families periodically receive Ages and Stages Questionnaires, which they complete and mail back to the program. Based on the questionnaires, the program determines whether the infant has screened positive for possible developmental delay and provides this information to both the family and the primary care provider.

The study will take place at Bellevue Hospital Center, a public hospital serving low socioeconomic status families from throughout New York City. Infant-mother dyads will be enrolled during the postpartum period and followed through age 2 years. Periodic assessments will be performed of parent-child interaction and child developmental outcome.

At age 3 years, VIP and control families were re-randomized to receive either additional VIP from age 3 to 5 years or to control during that period. This factorial design will allow for assessment of dose and timing in relation to outcomes.

We further plan to follow children into school, so that we can assess long-term educational outcomes including standardized test scores. Should long-term funding be obtained, we will follow children through high school to assess intervention impacts on graduation rates.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

675

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10016
        • New York University School of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

8 months and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Intention to receive primary care in the well-child clinic (FCC or newborn clinic) at Bellevue Hospital Center.
  • Intention to remain in the New York City area for at least 3 years.
  • Primary caregiver's language is English or Spanish.
  • Birthweight 2000gm or higher
  • Gestational age 35 weeks or higher

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Significant newborn medical complication
  • Significant congenital anomaly or syndrome

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Building Blocks (0-3)

Randomized at birth to receive Building Blocks Project from birth through 3 years of age.

Note: This arm not followed past 3 years of age; NOT re-randomized to any group at age 3.

This project employs a public health approach to facilitate parental engagement in child development. Families are sent monthly newsletters that focus on child development, infant cues and parenting; included with each newsletter is an inexpensive, developmentally stimulating toy. In addition, families periodically receive Ages and Stages Questionnaires, which they complete and mail back to the program. Based on the questionnaires, the program determines whether the infant has screened positive for possible developmental delay and provides this information to both the family and the primary care provider.
Experimental: VIP (0-3), VIP (3-5)

Randomized at birth to receive Video Interaction Project from birth through 3 years of age.

Re-randomized at 3 years to receive Video Interaction Project from 3-5 years of age.

While waiting to see the primary care provider for well child care, the family meets with a child development specialist, who videotapes the parent and infant interacting together. The videotape is then rewound and watched together by the parent and child development specialist. This leads to a discussion about child development, infant cues and parenting, with the child development specialist building on observed strengths in the interaction. In addition, families are provided with parenting pamphlets developed for the project, and with inexpensive developmentally stimulating toys.
Experimental: VIP (0-3), Control (3-5)

Randomized at birth to receive Video Interaction Project from birth through 3 years of age.

Re-randomized at 3 years to receive care as usual (control) from 3-5 years of age.

While waiting to see the primary care provider for well child care, the family meets with a child development specialist, who videotapes the parent and infant interacting together. The videotape is then rewound and watched together by the parent and child development specialist. This leads to a discussion about child development, infant cues and parenting, with the child development specialist building on observed strengths in the interaction. In addition, families are provided with parenting pamphlets developed for the project, and with inexpensive developmentally stimulating toys.
Experimental: Control (0-3), VIP (3-5)

Randomized at birth to receive care as usual (control) from birth through 3 years of age.

Re-randomized at 3 years to receive Video Interaction Project from 3-5 years of age.

While waiting to see the primary care provider for well child care, the family meets with a child development specialist, who videotapes the parent and infant interacting together. The videotape is then rewound and watched together by the parent and child development specialist. This leads to a discussion about child development, infant cues and parenting, with the child development specialist building on observed strengths in the interaction. In addition, families are provided with parenting pamphlets developed for the project, and with inexpensive developmentally stimulating toys.
No Intervention: Control (0-3), Control (3-5)

Randomized at birth to receive care as usual (control) from birth through 3 years of age.

Re-randomized at 3 years to receive receive care as usual (control) from 3-5 years of age.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Discipline assessed using the Discipline Survey
Time Frame: 6, 14, 24, 36, 54 mos and in 1st grade
Discipline mediates effects of poverty on social-emotional outcomes (Gershoff, 2007), and attitudes about discipline practices form early in children's lives (Socolar, 1996).
6, 14, 24, 36, 54 mos and in 1st grade
Stress related to interactions and lack of warmth will be assessed using The Parenting Stress Index - Short Form (PSI)
Time Frame: 6, 14, 24, 36, 54 mos and in 1st grade
Stress related to interactions and lack of warmth mediate effects of poverty on emotional outcomes.
6, 14, 24, 36, 54 mos and in 1st grade
Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development
Time Frame: 14, 24, and 36 mos
Will assess cognitive development
14, 24, and 36 mos
Woodcock-Johnson III Tests of Cognitive Abilities
Time Frame: 14, 24, and 36 mos
Will be used to estimate child's cognitive. Four sub-tests will be used: Verbal comprehension (VC) assesses the comprehension knowledge Cattell-Horn-Carroll cognitive factor (Gc); Memory for Words and Auditory Working Memory assess the short term memory CHC factor (Gsm); Visual Matching measures the CHC processing speed factor (Gs).
14, 24, and 36 mos

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Alan L Mendelsohn, MD, NYU Langone Health

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2005

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 18, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

December 18, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 19, 2005

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 19, 2005

First Posted (Estimate)

September 21, 2005

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 29, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 27, 2019

Last Verified

November 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Language Development Disorders

Clinical Trials on Building Blocks Project

3
Subscribe