Feasibility and Safety of Extraperitoneal Laparoscopic Extended Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection at Time of Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma

October 14, 2018 updated by: RenJi Hospital

Prospective Clinical Trial of the Feasibility and Safety of Extraperitoneal Laparoscopic Extended Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection at Time of Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma

Extended pelvic lymph node dissection in bladder carcinoma provides staging and, in selected patients, a survival benefit. Recent studies showed the therapeutic benefit of retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) in advanced stage of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Also laparoscopic extended RPLND is still a technical challenge in urology, considering the high rate of severe complications and difficulties in manipulation. In Renji Hospital, laparoscopic extended RPLND at time of nephroureterectomy was performed via an extraperitoneal approach, avoiding interference with abdominal organs and achieving better exposure.The aim of the present study was to determine the safety and feasibility of performing an extraperitoneal laparoscopic extended RPLND at the time of radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for UTUC in a prospectively collected cohort of patients.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Similar to urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB), UTUC can follow routes of metastases to involve regional lymph nodes. Nodal metastasis is an adverse prognostic indicator and results in poor outcome, irrespective of the use of systemic chemotherapy or radiation. The ' gold standard ' treatment for UUT-UC is RNU.

Extended pelvic lymph node dissection in bladder carcinoma provides staging and, in selected patients, a survival benefit. Recent studies showed the therapeutic benefit of RPLND in advanced stage urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract, but there is still a lack of prospective studies. Thus, the current guideline recommends lymph node dissection for invasive UCUT on the basis of insufficient evidence. But no prospective studies have standardized the ideal extent of RPLND or the optimum number of total lymph nodes that should be removed in patients with UUT-UC. Also more and more interest has been paid to establish standardized node dissection templates.

Also laparoscopic extended RPLND is still a technical challenge in urology, considering the high rate of severe complications and difficulties in manipulation. In Renji Hospital, laparoscopic extended RPLND at time of nephroureterectomy was performed via an extraperitoneal approach, avoiding interference with abdominal organs and achieving better exposure.

The aim of the present study was to determine the safety and feasibility of performing an extraperitoneal laparoscopic extended RPLND at the time of RNU for UTUC in a prospectively collected cohort of patients.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

40

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Shanghai
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China, 200123
        • Recruiting
        • Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University
        • Contact:
          • Jiwei Huang, M.D

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

11 years to 76 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

The patients who are clinically diagnosed with upper tract urothelial carcinoma and expected to receive radical nephroureterectomy will be the candidates for this study. They will be informed about this study and told about the pros and cons of extraperitoneal laparoscopic extended RPLND. If they were willing to attend this study, chest CT scan and other imaging method would be used to exclude out the distant metastasis.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • clinically diagnosed with upper tract urothelial carcinoma
  • have no distant metastasis
  • have an ECOG 0 to 2
  • expected to receive radical nephroureterectomy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • had no previous abdominal surgeries
  • contra-indications to laparoscopic surgery (e.g. severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease)
  • patients with cT4 disease before surgery

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Perioperative complications rate
Time Frame: 90 days
Perioperative complications were evaluated up to 90 days after surgery, and were graded by Clavien-Dindo classification.
90 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Operating time
Time Frame: during surgery
Operating time
during surgery
Estimate blood loss
Time Frame: during surgery
Estimate blood loss during surgery
during surgery
length of stay
Time Frame: 1 month
The length of hospital stay
1 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Wei Xue, M.D, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 21, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 30, 2018

Study Completion (Anticipated)

March 31, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 19, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 31, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

June 1, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 16, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 14, 2018

Last Verified

October 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe