- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03555279
PHAT Life: Peer Versus Adult-Led HIV Prevention for Juvenile Offenders (PHATLife)
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
The main objectives of the proposed study are to compare the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and sustainability of Youth Representative-led vs. probation staff-led PHAT Life in a real-world juvenile probation setting. The Specific Aims of this study are:
- To conduct a methodologically-rigorous 2-arm trial comparing the impact of PHAT Life on 350 13-17 year-old offenders' risky sex, STI, substance use, and theoretical mediators when delivered by Youth Representatives (YR) vs. probation staff (PS).
- To compare the costs and cost-effectiveness of 100 YR-led vs. PS-led PHAT Life with respect to the acquisition of incident STI.
We hypothesize: (a) Compared to teens in PS-led groups, we expect teens in YR-led groups to report less risky sex and substance use at 6-month follow-up, to demonstrate greater improvement on theoretical mediators of risk, and to have fewer incident STI infections; (b) We expect YR-led PHAT Life to cost less and be more cost-effective than PS-led PHAT Life.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Illinois
-
Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60612
- University of Illinois at Chicago
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
a) male or female gender; b) remanded to a probation program; c) 13-17 years old; d) adolescent is fluent in English; e) are not wards of the Department of Child and Family Services (DCFS); and f) they have not already received the PHAT Life intervention.
Exclusion Criteria:
a) are unable to understand the consent/assent process; b) do not speak English, because instruments are normed for English speakers; c) do not assent; d) legal guardians do not consent to teens' participation; e) are not 13 -17 years old; f) are not on probation or remanded to a probation program; g) are wards of the Department of Child and Family Services (DCFS); and h) they have already received the PHAT Life intervention.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Probation Staff (PS) Facilitator
The PHAT Life: Preventing HIV/AIDS Among Teens--PS Arm intervention is delivered by Probation Staff working at the intervention site.
Dosage is 8 2-hour sessions delivered over two weeks.
|
HIV Prevention Behavioral Health Intervention delivered by Probation Staff
|
|
Experimental: Youth Representative (YR) Facilitator
The PHAT Life: Preventing HIV/AIDS Among Teens--YR Arm intervention is delivered by young adults who were formally in the juvenile justice system.
Dosage is 8 2-hour sessions delivered over two weeks.
|
HIV Prevention Behavioral Health Intervention delivered by Youth Representatives
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in HIV/STI Risk Behaviors at 6 months
Time Frame: Baseline and 6-months
|
AIDS Risk Behavior Assessment (ARBA) A computer-assisted structured interview of self-reported sexual behavior and drug use derived from five well-established measures.
The outcomes include ever had sex, condom use, number of partners, sex while using drugs and/or alcohol.
|
Baseline and 6-months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in HIV/AIDS/STI Knowledge, Attitudes, Beliefs, and Behavioral Skills at 6
Time Frame: Baseline and 6-months
|
Survey measuring knowledge regarding transmission routes, misconceptions about transmission, and risk-reduction strategies; attitudes and beliefs including peer norms, intentions to prevent HIV/AIDS/STI, attitudes towards preventive actions, and beliefs about condom use; as well as self-efficacy to prevent transmission, apply condoms, and negotiate with a partner.
|
Baseline and 6-months
|
|
Change in mental health symptoms at 6 months
Time Frame: Baseline and 6-months
|
The Youth Self Report (YSR) is a widely-used and validated measure of child behavior problems that generates raw and T-scores for internalizing and externalizing syndromes as well as narrow-band problems (e.g., delinquency, anxiety, depression).
|
Baseline and 6-months
|
|
Change in Partner Sexual Communication at 6 months
Time Frame: Baseline and 6-months
|
Questionnaire in which participants indicate whether they ever talked to their romantic or dating partners and sexual partners about a list of sexual topics, how often they discussed them, and whether they talk was open and comfortable.
Items were adapted from the Sexual Risk Behavior Questionnaire.
|
Baseline and 6-months
|
|
Change in Relationship dynamics at 6 months
Time Frame: Baseline and 6-months
|
The Sexual Relationship Power Scale (SRPS) measures perceptions of relationship control and decision-making dominance.
It has good internal consistency and predictive and constructed validity.
|
Baseline and 6-months
|
|
Change in trauma symptoms and violence exposure at 6 months
Time Frame: Baseline and 6-months
|
The UCLA PTSD Index will measure exposure to trauma and violence.
|
Baseline and 6-months
|
|
Change in peer influences at 6 months
Time Frame: Baseline and 6-months
|
The Peer Convention Behavior Questionnaire will measure peer support of risky behavior, peer norms, and peer pressure and teens' association with prosocial peers.
|
Baseline and 6-months
|
|
Change in parental Influences at 6 months
Time Frame: Baseline and 6-months
|
The Parenting Style Questionnaire (PSQ) measures parental supervision, monitoring, and permissiveness.
|
Baseline and 6-months
|
|
Change in parental communication at 6 months
Time Frame: Baseline and 6-months
|
The Parent-Child Sexual Communication Questionnaire assesses youths' perceived quality and quantity of risk-specific communication with their parents.
|
Baseline and 6-months
|
|
Biological Measure of N. Gonorrhoeae Acquisition
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months
|
Sexually transmitted infections will be measured using biological endpoint (yes/no) to evaluate intervention effects.
Participants will be screened for N. gonorrhoeae and treated if necessary at baseline.
They will be tested again 12 months later to determine rate of STI acquisition.
|
Baseline and 6 months
|
|
Biological Measure of C. Trachomatis Acquisition
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months
|
Sexually transmitted infections will be measured using biological endpoint (yes/no) to evaluate intervention effects.
Participants will be screened for C. Trachomatis and treated if necessary at baseline.
They will be tested again 12 months later to determine rate of STI acquisition.
|
Baseline and 6 months
|
|
Biological Measure of T. Vaginalis Acquisition
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months
|
Sexually transmitted infections will be measured using biological endpoint (yes/no) to evaluate intervention effects.
Participants will be screened for T. Vaginalis and treated if necessary at baseline.
They will be tested again 12 months later to determine rate of STI acquisition.
|
Baseline and 6 months
|
|
Facilitator Characteristics
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Probation teens will rate the facilitator team on similarity, credibility, competence, warmth, physical attractiveness, and sense of humor using the 9-item Perception of Peer Educator Rating Scale
|
Baseline
|
|
Cost Effectiveness
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
The costs associated with intervention delivery for each arm will be collected to explore differences across arms.
|
Through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Geri DONENBERG, PhD, University of Illinois at Chicago
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Donenberg GR, Emerson E, Mackesy-Amiti ME, Udell W. HIV-Risk Reduction with Juvenile Offenders on Probation. J Child Fam Stud. 2015 Jun 1;24(6):1672-1684. doi: 10.1007/s10826-014-9970-z.
- Udell W, Donenberg G, Emerson E. Parents matter in HIV-risk among probation youth. J Fam Psychol. 2011 Oct;25(5):785-9. doi: 10.1037/a0024987.
- Wilson HW, Berent E, Donenberg GR, Emerson EM, Rodriguez EM, Sandesara A. Trauma History and PTSD Symptoms in Juvenile Offenders on Probation. Vict Offender. 2013;8(4):10.1080/15564886.2013.835296. doi: 10.1080/15564886.2013.835296.
- Donenberg G, Emerson E, Kendall AD. HIV-risk reduction intervention for juvenile offenders on probation: The PHAT Life group randomized controlled trial. Health Psychol. 2018 Apr;37(4):364-374. doi: 10.1037/hea0000582. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
- Kendall AD, Emerson EM, Hartmann WE, Zinbarg RE, Donenberg GR. A Two-Week Psychosocial Intervention Reduces Future Aggression and Incarceration in Clinically Aggressive Juvenile Offenders. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2017 Dec;56(12):1053-1061. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2017.09.424. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- RNA Virus Infections
- Virus Diseases
- Infections
- Blood-Borne Infections
- Communicable Diseases
- Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Viral
- Sexually Transmitted Diseases
- Lentivirus Infections
- Retroviridae Infections
- Immunologic Deficiency Syndromes
- Immune System Diseases
- Slow Virus Diseases
- HIV Infections
- Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2015-0936 (Other Identifier: M D Anderson Cancer Center)
- 1R01MD010433 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.