PHAT Life: Peer Versus Adult-Led HIV Prevention for Juvenile Offenders (PHATLife)

April 19, 2023 updated by: Geri Donenberg, University of Illinois at Chicago
This application proposes a 2-arm randomized controlled trial comparing the impact of PHAT Life on 350 13-17 year-old offenders' risky sex, STI, substance use, and theoretical mediators when delivered by Youth Representatives (YR) vs. probation staff (PS). 100 facilitators will be recruited to deliver the intervention and participate in the research.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The main objectives of the proposed study are to compare the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and sustainability of Youth Representative-led vs. probation staff-led PHAT Life in a real-world juvenile probation setting. The Specific Aims of this study are:

  1. To conduct a methodologically-rigorous 2-arm trial comparing the impact of PHAT Life on 350 13-17 year-old offenders' risky sex, STI, substance use, and theoretical mediators when delivered by Youth Representatives (YR) vs. probation staff (PS).
  2. To compare the costs and cost-effectiveness of 100 YR-led vs. PS-led PHAT Life with respect to the acquisition of incident STI.

We hypothesize: (a) Compared to teens in PS-led groups, we expect teens in YR-led groups to report less risky sex and substance use at 6-month follow-up, to demonstrate greater improvement on theoretical mediators of risk, and to have fewer incident STI infections; (b) We expect YR-led PHAT Life to cost less and be more cost-effective than PS-led PHAT Life.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

218

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60612
        • University of Illinois at Chicago

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

13 years to 17 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

a) male or female gender; b) remanded to a probation program; c) 13-17 years old; d) adolescent is fluent in English; e) are not wards of the Department of Child and Family Services (DCFS); and f) they have not already received the PHAT Life intervention.

Exclusion Criteria:

a) are unable to understand the consent/assent process; b) do not speak English, because instruments are normed for English speakers; c) do not assent; d) legal guardians do not consent to teens' participation; e) are not 13 -17 years old; f) are not on probation or remanded to a probation program; g) are wards of the Department of Child and Family Services (DCFS); and h) they have already received the PHAT Life intervention.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Probation Staff (PS) Facilitator
The PHAT Life: Preventing HIV/AIDS Among Teens--PS Arm intervention is delivered by Probation Staff working at the intervention site. Dosage is 8 2-hour sessions delivered over two weeks.
HIV Prevention Behavioral Health Intervention delivered by Probation Staff
Experimental: Youth Representative (YR) Facilitator
The PHAT Life: Preventing HIV/AIDS Among Teens--YR Arm intervention is delivered by young adults who were formally in the juvenile justice system. Dosage is 8 2-hour sessions delivered over two weeks.
HIV Prevention Behavioral Health Intervention delivered by Youth Representatives

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in HIV/STI Risk Behaviors at 6 months
Time Frame: Baseline and 6-months
AIDS Risk Behavior Assessment (ARBA) A computer-assisted structured interview of self-reported sexual behavior and drug use derived from five well-established measures. The outcomes include ever had sex, condom use, number of partners, sex while using drugs and/or alcohol.
Baseline and 6-months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in HIV/AIDS/STI Knowledge, Attitudes, Beliefs, and Behavioral Skills at 6
Time Frame: Baseline and 6-months
Survey measuring knowledge regarding transmission routes, misconceptions about transmission, and risk-reduction strategies; attitudes and beliefs including peer norms, intentions to prevent HIV/AIDS/STI, attitudes towards preventive actions, and beliefs about condom use; as well as self-efficacy to prevent transmission, apply condoms, and negotiate with a partner.
Baseline and 6-months
Change in mental health symptoms at 6 months
Time Frame: Baseline and 6-months
The Youth Self Report (YSR) is a widely-used and validated measure of child behavior problems that generates raw and T-scores for internalizing and externalizing syndromes as well as narrow-band problems (e.g., delinquency, anxiety, depression).
Baseline and 6-months
Change in Partner Sexual Communication at 6 months
Time Frame: Baseline and 6-months
Questionnaire in which participants indicate whether they ever talked to their romantic or dating partners and sexual partners about a list of sexual topics, how often they discussed them, and whether they talk was open and comfortable. Items were adapted from the Sexual Risk Behavior Questionnaire.
Baseline and 6-months
Change in Relationship dynamics at 6 months
Time Frame: Baseline and 6-months
The Sexual Relationship Power Scale (SRPS) measures perceptions of relationship control and decision-making dominance. It has good internal consistency and predictive and constructed validity.
Baseline and 6-months
Change in trauma symptoms and violence exposure at 6 months
Time Frame: Baseline and 6-months
The UCLA PTSD Index will measure exposure to trauma and violence.
Baseline and 6-months
Change in peer influences at 6 months
Time Frame: Baseline and 6-months
The Peer Convention Behavior Questionnaire will measure peer support of risky behavior, peer norms, and peer pressure and teens' association with prosocial peers.
Baseline and 6-months
Change in parental Influences at 6 months
Time Frame: Baseline and 6-months
The Parenting Style Questionnaire (PSQ) measures parental supervision, monitoring, and permissiveness.
Baseline and 6-months
Change in parental communication at 6 months
Time Frame: Baseline and 6-months
The Parent-Child Sexual Communication Questionnaire assesses youths' perceived quality and quantity of risk-specific communication with their parents.
Baseline and 6-months
Biological Measure of N. Gonorrhoeae Acquisition
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months
Sexually transmitted infections will be measured using biological endpoint (yes/no) to evaluate intervention effects. Participants will be screened for N. gonorrhoeae and treated if necessary at baseline. They will be tested again 12 months later to determine rate of STI acquisition.
Baseline and 6 months
Biological Measure of C. Trachomatis Acquisition
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months
Sexually transmitted infections will be measured using biological endpoint (yes/no) to evaluate intervention effects. Participants will be screened for C. Trachomatis and treated if necessary at baseline. They will be tested again 12 months later to determine rate of STI acquisition.
Baseline and 6 months
Biological Measure of T. Vaginalis Acquisition
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months
Sexually transmitted infections will be measured using biological endpoint (yes/no) to evaluate intervention effects. Participants will be screened for T. Vaginalis and treated if necessary at baseline. They will be tested again 12 months later to determine rate of STI acquisition.
Baseline and 6 months
Facilitator Characteristics
Time Frame: Baseline
Probation teens will rate the facilitator team on similarity, credibility, competence, warmth, physical attractiveness, and sense of humor using the 9-item Perception of Peer Educator Rating Scale
Baseline
Cost Effectiveness
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 years
The costs associated with intervention delivery for each arm will be collected to explore differences across arms.
Through study completion, an average of 2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Geri DONENBERG, PhD, University of Illinois at Chicago

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 13, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 5, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

May 26, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 18, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 31, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

June 13, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 21, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 19, 2023

Last Verified

April 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe