IRIS Hook Assisted Phacoemulsification in Vitrectomized Eyes

Although phacoemulsification in previously vitrectomized eyes is a relatively safe procedure comparing with extracapsular cataract surgery, it is still more challenging than in eyes without previous vitrectomy because of the anatomical differences after PPV. Intraoperative difficulties such as abnormal anterior chamber deepening, unstable posterior capsules, and weakened zonules have been reported.

The investigators aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a new simple iris hook assisted maneuver in phacoemulsification, then compare the incidence of intraoperative and postoperative complications of this technique with traditional phacoemulsification and phacoemulsification with 25-gauge vitreous irrigation. The latter two surgery methods are currently popular for cataract in vitrectomized eyes.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

With the continuous evolution in vitrectomy techniques and instrumentation, an increasing number of vitreorential disorders are being successfully managed with pars plana vitrectomy (PPV). Cataract is one of the most common complications seen in phakic patients following PPV, and the incidence of it ranges from 4 to 80%, even up to 100% in various studies.

Although phacoemulsification in previously vitrectomized eyes is a relatively safe procedure comparing with extracapsular cataract surgery, it is still more challenging than in eyes without previous vitrectomy because of the anatomical differences after PPV. Intraoperative difficulties such as abnormal anterior chamber deepening, unstable posterior capsules, and weakened zonules have been reported.

The investigators aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a new simple iris hook assisted maneuver in phacoemulsification, then compare the incidence of intraoperative and postoperative complications of this technique with traditional phacoemulsification and phacoemulsification with 25-gauge vitreous irrigation. The latter two surgery methods are currently popular for cataract in vitrectomized eyes.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

62

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Shaanxi
      • Xi'an, Shaanxi, China, 710004
        • Department of Ophthalmology, Second affiliated hospital of Xian Jiaotong University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. patients with visually significant cataract following PPV
  2. After PPV vitreous substitutes were air / gas (Perfluoropropane:C3F8) or BSS,
  3. After PPV if vitreous substitute was silicone oil, that should be removed at least 3 months.
  4. The duration between PPV / silicone oil remove and phacoemulsification should more than 3 months
  5. Willing and able to comply with clinic visits and study-related procedures
  6. Provide signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Eyes with a history of acute angle-closure glaucoma, trauma,
  2. Eyes with a clinically dislocated or subluxated lens.
  3. Active ocular or periocular infection in the study eye
  4. Uncontrolled Blood Pressure
  5. Pregnant or breast-feeding women
  6. Participation in another simultaneous medical investigator or trial

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: IRIS HOOK
iris hook assisted maneuver in phacoemulsification
iris hook assisted maneuver in phacoemulsification
Active Comparator: TRADITION
traditional phacoemulsification or phacoemulsification with 25-gauge vitreous irrigation
traditional phacoemulsification or phacoemulsification with 25-gauge vitreous irrigation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Stability of anterior chamber and pupil
Time Frame: Intraoperative
The traditional phacoemulsification in vitrectomized eyes usually with more Intraoperative difficulties such as abnormal anterior chamber deepening and unstable pupil. To evaluate whether the new method will increase the stability of anterior chamber and pupil.
Intraoperative
Time of operation
Time Frame: Intraoperative
To evaluate whether the new method will shorten the operation time
Intraoperative
Cumulative dissipated energy (CDE)
Time Frame: Intraoperative
To evaluate whether the new method will decrease CDE. CDE reflect the damage of phacoemulsification to the eye, It can be acquired automatically from the phacoemulsification machine. The unit of CDE is mJ.
Intraoperative

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The presence of intraoperative complications
Time Frame: Intraoperative
The incidence of complications, including infusion deprivation syndrome, anterior capsulorhexis extension, iris trauma, descemets detachment, posterior capsular defect, nucleus drop, etc
Intraoperative
Visual acuity (VA)
Time Frame: 3 months after opreation
To evaluate whether the surgery can effectively increase VA.
3 months after opreation
Intraocular pressure(IOP)
Time Frame: 3 months after opreation
The traditional phacoemulsification in vitrectomized eyes usually cause low IOP in the early stage, and sometimes induce detachment of choroid. To evaluate whether the new method will avoid the low IOP in the early stage.
3 months after opreation
The presence of postoperative complications
Time Frame: 3 months after opreation
The incidence of complications, including corneal edema, cystoid macular edema, etc.
3 months after opreation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ling Bai, MD,PhD, Second Affiliated Hospital of Xian Jiaotong University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 21, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 10, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

July 12, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 6, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 5, 2020

Last Verified

March 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IRIS hook

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe