A Randomized Controlled Trial of Bilateral Movement-based Computer Games Training to Improve Motor Function of Upper Limb and Quality of Life in Sub-acute Stroke Patient

August 5, 2018 updated by: Lam So Ling, Stefanie, Shatin Hospital
This study aims at investigating whether bilateral movement-based training with computer games could augment motor function of paretic upper limb and improve quality of life in sub-acute stroke patients.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

93

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

45 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age between 45-85
  • Diagnosis of ischaemic brain injury or intracerebral hemorrhage by MRI or computed tomography 1 week to 6 months after the onset of current stroke
  • Scoring > 6 of 10 of Abbreviated Mental Test
  • Ability of the paretic hand to hold the game controller (minimal control)
  • Able to give informed consent of the study
  • Can understand instructions given by English or Cantonese

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any additional medical, cardiovascular and orthopaedic condition that would hinder the proper assessment and treatment
  • Having cardiac pacemaker
  • Receptive dysphasia
  • Undergoing drug studies or other clinical trials

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Bilateral movement-based computer training

All subjects underwent 16 sessions of assigned treatment (2 times per week; for 8 weeks; 3 hours standardized rehabilitation program per visit) There was 1.5 hours standardized conventional physiotherapy training a 1.5 hours multi-disciplinary program which consisted of standardized occupational therapy, speech therapy and nursing care.

Subjects in Intervention Group will be assigned an additional 30 minutes bilateral movement-based computer games(Able-X) training program of upper limb.

Other: Video-directed conventional training
All subjects underwent 16 sessions of assigned treatment (2 times per week; for 8 weeks; 3 hours standardized rehabilitation program per visit) There was 1.5 hours standardized conventional physiotherapy training a 1.5 hours multi-disciplinary program which consisted of standardized occupational therapy, speech therapy and nursing care.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity Scores (FMA-UE scores) baseline to 4 weeks
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 4 weeks
The Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) is a stroke-specific, performance-based impairment index. It is designed to assess motor functioning, balance, sensation and joint functioning in patients with post-stroke hemiplegia. It is applied clinically and in research to determine disease severity, describe motor recovery, and to plan and assess treatment. The FMA-UE scores measure motor impairment of upper extremity. The motor domain includes items assessing movement, coordination, and reflex action of the shoulder, elbow, forearm, wrist and hand.
Change from baseline to 4 weeks
Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity Scores (FMA-UE scores) baseline to 8 weeks
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 8 weeks
The Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) is a stroke-specific, performance-based impairment index. It is designed to assess motor functioning, balance, sensation and joint functioning in patients with post-stroke hemiplegia. It is applied clinically and in research to determine disease severity, describe motor recovery, and to plan and assess treatment. The FMA-UE scores measure motor impairment of upper extremity. The motor domain includes items assessing movement, coordination, and reflex action of the shoulder, elbow, forearm, wrist and hand.
Change from baseline to 8 weeks
Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity Scores (FMA-UE scores) baseline to followup
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 12 weeks (4 weeks after training ended)
The Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) is a stroke-specific, performance-based impairment index. It is designed to assess motor functioning, balance, sensation and joint functioning in patients with post-stroke hemiplegia. It is applied clinically and in research to determine disease severity, describe motor recovery, and to plan and assess treatment. The FMA-UE scores measure motor impairment of upper extremity. The motor domain includes items assessing movement, coordination, and reflex action of the shoulder, elbow, forearm, wrist and hand.
Change from baseline to 12 weeks (4 weeks after training ended)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) baseline to 4 weeks
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 4 weeks
The Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) is an evaluative measure to assess specific changes in limb function among individuals who sustained cortical damage resulting in hemiplegia. It assesses a client's ability to handle objects differing in size, weight and shape and therefore can be considered to be an arm-specific measure of activity limitation.
Change from baseline to 4 weeks
Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) baseline to 8 weeks
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 8 weeks
The Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) is an evaluative measure to assess specific changes in limb function among individuals who sustained cortical damage resulting in hemiplegia. It assesses a client's ability to handle objects differing in size, weight and shape and therefore can be considered to be an arm-specific measure of activity limitation.
Change from baseline to 8 weeks
Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) baseline to followup
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 12 weeks (4 weeks after training ended)
The Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) is an evaluative measure to assess specific changes in limb function among individuals who sustained cortical damage resulting in hemiplegia. It assesses a client's ability to handle objects differing in size, weight and shape and therefore can be considered to be an arm-specific measure of activity limitation.
Change from baseline to 12 weeks (4 weeks after training ended)
Short-Form Health Survey Hong Kong version (HK-SF-36) baseline to 4 weeks
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 4 weeks
The Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) is a widely used, generic, patient-report measure created to assess health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in the general population. SF-36 is the most commonly used generic instrument for measuring quality of life.
Change from baseline to 4 weeks
Short-Form Health Survey Hong Kong version (HK-SF-36) baseline to 8 weeks
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 8 weeks
The Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) is a widely used, generic, patient-report measure created to assess health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in the general population. SF-36 is the most commonly used generic instrument for measuring quality of life.
Change from baseline to 8 weeks
Short-Form Health Survey Hong Kong version (HK-SF-36) baseline to followup
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 12 weeks (4 weeks after training ended)
The Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) is a widely used, generic, patient-report measure created to assess health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in the general population. SF-36 is the most commonly used generic instrument for measuring quality of life.
Change from baseline to 12 weeks (4 weeks after training ended)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 3, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 6, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 5, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

August 7, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 7, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 5, 2018

Last Verified

August 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on Bilateral movement-based computer training

3
Subscribe