Improving Health Communication During the Transition From Pediatric to Adult Diabetes Care

February 5, 2024 updated by: Randi Streisand, Children's National Research Institute
Adolescents and young adults (AYAs; ages 17-23) with type 1 diabetes are at high risk for negative health outcomes, including poor glycemic control and disengagement from the health care system. The deterioration of glycemic control occurs in parallel with the assumption of independent self-care skills and preparation for adult diabetes care. Effective communication between AYAs and health care providers may be a critical contributor to diabetes self-care skills during the transition to adult diabetes care and related glycemic control. This research will attempt to better prepare adolescents and young adults for adult diabetes care by delivering innovative intervention content focused on both health communication skills and transition readiness skills. The investigators aim to leverage innovative technologies to improve developmentally-appropriate communication skills related to planning for clinic visits, disclosing and discussing diabetes-related concerns, and optimizing glucose data review in preparation for adult diabetes care. Adolescents and young adults with type 1 diabetes (ages 17-23) who are planning to transition to adult diabetes care within the next 6-8 months will be enrolled in the study and randomized to either the intervention group or a standard care control group. Medical, communication and psychosocial data (including A1c, glucose monitoring frequency, communication quality, health care engagement, depressive symptoms) will be collected from adolescent and young adult participants and health care providers at baseline and two follow-up time points, approximately 4 months post-baseline and approximately 8-12 months post-baseline after the transfer to adult diabetes care. This intervention has the potential to improve diabetes self-care skills, including engagement with health care providers, and glycemic control in AYAs with type 1 diabetes during the vulnerable period of transfer to adult diabetes care. The results of this work will inform best practices for the transition to adult diabetes care and can be translated into clinical care.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Detailed Description

Research Design and Methods Overview of Study Design & Procedure. The aim of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) is to determine the efficacy of a behavioral intervention targeting health communication skills and diabetes self-management skills in preparation for the transfer to adult diabetes care, compared to usual care. The intervention, Plan, Reflect, and Engage with Providers for Diabetes Care (PREP-DC), consists of three intervention sessions with a study interventionist, paired text messages, and access to glucose management software. It is expected that adolescents and young adults allocated to the intervention condition (PREP-DC) will evidence: 1) better glycemic control (lower A1c); 2) shorter gap in time between the last visit in pediatric diabetes care and the first visit in adult diabetes care; 3) better diabetes management (better adherence to the diabetes regimen); 4) fewer reported complications (e.g. hospitalizations and emergency department visits). A total of 100 adolescent and young adult participants (ages 17-23) will be randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to either the PREP-DC intervention condition (n=50) or usual care (n=50; standard care comparison condition): all participants receive standard resources for transition to adult diabetes care as part of usual care in both conditions.

Participants include 100 adolescents and young adults (ages 17-23) diagnosed with T1D for at least one year (anticipated 50% female) seen for diabetes care at Children's National Medical Center (CNMC) in Washington, DC. Eligible participants will self-identify as planning to transfer to adult diabetes care within the upcoming 6-8 months. Participants in the PREP-DC intervention will complete three intervention sessions with study team members over a 3 month period (approximately 1 intervention session per month). Two sessions will be with a trained study interventionist focusing on communication with health care providers and preparation for medical visits and adult diabetes care. One session will be with a certified diabetes education focusing on problem-solving using glucose data and glucose data review. PREP-DC intervention participants will also receive text messages (3-4 messages/week) for the 3 month intervention period supporting intervention content. Participants also will be given information about accessing glucose management software specific to their diabetes devices and related study resources (e.g. study website). Participants are evaluated at baseline (pre-randomization to intervention or standard care comparison group) and follow-up (approximately 4 months post-baseline and approximately 8-12 months post-baseline after the transition to adult diabetes care).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

52

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • District of Columbia
      • Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20010
        • Children's National Health System

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

17 years to 23 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosed with type1 diabetes for ≥ 1 year
  • Able to adequately understand, speak, and read English to benefit from participation
  • Ready and consistent text messaging access to participate
  • Within 6-8 months of planned transfer to adult diabetes care

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Other life-threatening disease (e.g. cancer) or major psychiatric disorder (e.g. schizophrenia) that significantly limits participation
  • Pervasive developmental disorder that significantly limits participation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: PREP-DC Intervention
50 participants will be randomized to the Plan, Reflect, and Engage with Providers for Diabetes Care (PREP-DC) intervention. Participants will complete 3 intervention sessions with study interventionists and will receive text messages and other study resources during the active intervention period (3 months).
Behavioral intervention designed to improve health communication skills and readiness for adult diabetes care
Other Names:
  • PREP-DC
No Intervention: Standard Care Comparison
50 participants will be randomized to standard care and will participate in regular diabetes clinic visits and receive standard materials on the transition to adult diabetes care, as they would have done without participation in this study.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hemoglobin A1c
Time Frame: 8 months post-baseline
measurement of hemoglobin A1c (A1c; reported as a percentage)
8 months post-baseline
Number of days to first adult diabetes care visit
Time Frame: 8 months post-baseline
Number of days between the last visit in pediatric diabetes care and the first visit in adult diabetes care (reported as number of days)
8 months post-baseline
Adherence to the diabetes care regimen
Time Frame: 8 months post-baseline
Participant report on the Diabetes Management Questionnaire (DMQ), a self-report measure of adherence to the diabetes care regimen. The DMQ consists of 20 items scored on a 0-4 Likert Scale. The measure has a total score; the mean score on all items is calculated and multiplied by 25 to arrive at the total score (possible range 0-100). A higher score indicates greater adherence to diabetes management.
8 months post-baseline
Diabetes-related hospitalizations
Time Frame: 8 months post-baseline
Participant report and medical record review of reported diabetes-related hospitalizations for the duration of the study period. The total number of hospitalizations is summed.
8 months post-baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Randi Streisand, PhD, Children's National Research Institute

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 6, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2023

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 15, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 1, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 6, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

November 7, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 7, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 5, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus

Clinical Trials on Plan, Reflect, and Engage with Providers for Diabetes Care

3
Subscribe