Interest of Trimodality PET-CT Choline MRI Before Radiotherapy in High Risk Prostate Cancer (DEMETER)

July 29, 2020 updated by: Centre Henri Becquerel

Interest of Trimodality PET-CT Choline MRI Before Radiotherapy in High Risk Prostate Cancer Using Geometric Indexes

The initial staging of locally advanced prostate cancer is made with Computed Tomography scan (CT), Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), and bone scan (BS).

For this type of cancer, reference treatment is radiotherapy combined with hormone therapy.

The added value of MRI in the delineation of volumes for radiotherapy is known, especially for the definition of extra-prostatic extensions and prostatic apex. However, its regular use is difficult. Indeed, acquisition of Magnetic Resonance Imaging parameters for diagnostic are not adapted to be fused with the planning Computed Tomography.

The literature shows that Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography with Fluorocholine is better in terms of diagnostic performance compared to bone scan for bone metastases and to pelvic Magnetic Resonance Imaging for nodal extension.

It would therefore improve staging for these patients with a high risk of locoregional and metastatic invasion even if its use is currently not recommended in the initial staging.

Thanks to Magnetic Resonance Imaging acquisition parameters adapted to Radiotherapy and additional functional information, an acquisition in tri-modality Positron Emission Tomography/computed Tomography/ Magnetic Resonance Imaging could have an impact on the volumes definition for radiotherapy or even on the therapeutic strategy.

The aim of the study is to evaluate the volume modifications obtained on the trimodality evaluation, compared to the standard initial staging (geometric comparison).

In addition, it would be a preliminary study for a project using Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) in trimodality, and / or for a therapeutic interventional study.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Prostate cancer (Pca) is the first human cancer in terms of incidence and the third leading cause of tumor death (56,000 new cases/year in France in 2012 and nearly 9,000 deaths). According to the French Association of Urology 2013, an individual screening based on rectal examination and prostatic specific antigen (PSA) is recommended for men over 50. Ultrasound (US) guided biopsy allows the histological diagnosis and the Gleason score evaluation. For high-risk of prostate Cancer, initial staging is based on pelvic Magnetic Resonance Imaging, abdominal pelvic computed tomography and bone scan.

External radiotherapy combined with prolonged hormone therapy is the reference treatment for these cancers.

Radiotherapy requires a planning Computed Tomography. Magnetic Resonance Imaging is known to be better for definition of extra-prostatic extensions and prostatic apex. However, its regular use is difficult for the radiotherapy planning.

Moreover, Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography with Fluorocholine detects earlier nodal and bone metastasis.

Hypothesis: A single planning acquisition in trimodality in radiotherapy position should improve simultaneously the initial staging and the volume delineation for radiotherapy.

Main objective: Main objective is to compare volumes delineation (prostatic target and organ at risk) thanks to geometric index (Jaccard, Dice and overlap), got by trimodality and by standard initial staging and planning Computed Tomography.

Expected results: Thanks to literature data, it can be expected that prostatic delineation target volume will significantly decrease with Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Furthermore, thanks to Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography with Fluorocholine, radiotherapy planning would be different, detecting 14% of nodal extension and 7% of bone metastasis.

Finally, with trimodality the investigators expect a smaller prostate volume and a higher detection of metastatic lymph node or bone metastasis.

Then, the investigators expect an improvement of the management of patients by:

  • Detecting more nodal or bone metastasis and avoiding a useless local treatment by radiotherapy
  • Improving prostatic target volume delineation and allowing a better protection of organ at risk.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • More than 18 years
  • prostate cancer : High risk (according to D'Amico Classification)
  • and/or Node positive on MRI
  • T2c-T3 on MRI
  • with staging assessment
  • will receive radiotherapy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • second cancer
  • contraindication to MRI
  • participation in an another therapeutic trial
  • patients under guardianship or curatorship

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Trimodality
PET-CT with fluorocholine and MRI
PET-CT and MRI

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Delineation volumes
Time Frame: 1 day
Measure of volumes delineation for radiotherapy thanks to trimodality and comparison to those obtained with standard technique
1 day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Treatment plan
Time Frame: 6 weeks
percentage of patient for whom the therapeutic decision will be different with standard assessment
6 weeks
Dosimetry
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Variation of dosimetry between trimodality imaging and standard assessment
6 weeks
F-choline fixation in MRI
Time Frame: 1 day
Comparison of percentage of choline fixation during magnetic resonance imaging
1 day
contouring of target lesions and organ at risk
Time Frame: 6 weeks
comparison of contouring duration with the two techniques of imagery
6 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 16, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

October 16, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 31, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 7, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

November 8, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 30, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 29, 2020

Last Verified

July 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Prostate Cancer

Clinical Trials on imaging in trimodality

3
Subscribe