IPACK and Adductor Canal Catheter Patient Outcomes for TKAs?

February 18, 2020 updated by: Eva Boyd, MD, University of California, Los Angeles

Do Patients Who Receive the IPACK and Adductor Canal Catheter Have Better Outcomes Than Patients Receiving the Adductor Canal Catheter Alone for Total Knee Replacements?

This study evaluates the addition of the IPACK block to the adductor canal block and catheter in the pain management of total knee arthroplasty. Half of participants will receive the adductor canal block and catheter with the IPACK block, while the other half will receive the adductor canal block and catheter only.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a surgical procedure that can be associated with significant post-operative pain. Poor pain control in the post-operative period has contributed to delays in early mobility and rehabilitation, an important part of recovery that is best started as soon as possible after surgery. Regional techniques in general have helped manage post-operative pain as well as minimize narcotic use. The application of femoral and sciatic nerve blocks has been shown to decrease opioid use; however, they were associated with adverse events such as quadriceps weakness and falls post-operatively. This led to the development of the adductor canal block (ACB) which has gained favor for providing superior analgesia over opioids alone, and for the added benefit of sparing the quadriceps muscle. Recently, adding local anesthetic to the interspace between the popliteal artery and posterior capsule of the knee (IPACK) blocks have been used to help address pain in the posterior part of the knee that is not well covered by the adductor canal block alone. While the sciatic nerve block is also an option to cover this area, it is associated with foot drop which can hinder early mobility. For patients undergoing TKAs at UCLA, our standard of practice is the ACB. The investigators hope to show with this study that adopting this novel block will help with post-operative pain control, decrease length of hospital stay, and increase distance walked during physical therapy.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Early Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Santa Monica, California, United States, 90404
        • UCLA Medical Center, Santa Monica

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients undergoing total knee replacement without contraindications to regional blocks

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who have contraindications to regional blocks: infection at injection site for the nerve block, allergy to local anesthetics, history of a bleeding disorder

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Adductor Canal Block + Catheter
Adductor canal block: 15 mL of 0.25% ropivicaine, adductor canal catheter: 6 mL/hr of 0.2% ropivacaine
Adductor canal block + catheter
EXPERIMENTAL: Adductor Canal Block + Catheter & IPACK
Adductor canal block: 15 mL of 0.25% ropivicaine, adductor canal catheter: 6 mL/hr of 0.2% ropivacaine, IPACK block: 15 ml of 0.25% ropivacaine.
Adductor Canal Block + Catheter & IPACK block

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Opioid consumption in milligram morphine equivalents
Time Frame: 4 days
Total opioid consumption will be calculated for postoperative day 0-3 ( postoperative day 0 is the day of the surgery and is the first day of the time frame and postoperative day 3 is the 4th day) and total hospital stay. Opioid amount will be converted to morphine equivalents (milligram) for comparison.
4 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual analog pain scores
Time Frame: 4 days
Pain scores will be assessed postoperative day 0-3 ( postoperative day 0 is the day of the surgery and is the first day of the time frame and postoperative day 3 is the 4th day) using the visual analog score (Scale 0-10). Zero for no pain and ten being the worst pain experienced. They will be obtained and recorded every 4 to 6 hours by the nurse monitoring the subject.
4 days
Distance ambulated during physical therapy
Time Frame: 4 days
Distance (meters) ambulated during physical therapy will be recorded for postoperative day 0-3 ( postoperative day 0 is the day of the surgery and is the first day of the time frame and postoperative day 3 is the 4th day)
4 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

February 12, 2019

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

May 28, 2019

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

May 28, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 4, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 12, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

December 13, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

February 19, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 18, 2020

Last Verified

February 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 18-001490

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Surgery

Clinical Trials on Adductor canal block + catheter

Subscribe