- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03781661
Providing Patient Information and CT Examination Results (INFOCT)
Providing Patients With Extended Information and Examination Results Immediately After a Diagnostic CT of the Coronary Arteries
Chest pain is a common cause of visits in the Emergency Room and General Practice, and is most commonly connected as a symptom of coronary disease, as for instance angina pectoris and acute myocardial infarct. Approximately 75-80% of these patients are not diagnosed with coronary disease or other cardiac findings. However, many of these patients still report chest pain and worries about cardiac disease.
This study is based on patients that are referred to a CT-examination of the coronary arteries on the background of chest pain, where the CT-examination shows normal coronary arteries.
The study aims to evaluate whether providing an intervention to this group of patients has an effect on patient satisfaction, patient's worry of cardiac disease and incidence of chest pain.
The intervention group will be compared with a similar group going through the same CT-examination, but is receiving the examination result from their regular general practitioner (RGP), which is considered standard care.
The hypothesis is that patients with chest pain with no coronary findings receiving extended information before getting the normal examination results experience a better patient satisfaction than those receiving the examination result from their RGP.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This study is a randomized controlled study. Eligible patients going through a CT-examination of the heart's coronary arteries, Coronary CT Angiogram (CCTA) will after an informed consent be randomized into two groups, either the intervention group or standard care.
The intervention consists of extended information regarding the benefits of doing a CCTA, thereby emphasising the specificity and accuracy of the CCTA's ability to exclude coronary disease. After this, there will be given an opportunity of a visual go-through and explanation of CT-images. Then they will be informed of the examination result that shows normal coronary arteries.
Follow up is planned after one month, six months and twelve months, where the participants receive the same questionnaire as at baseline to fill out and return. The questionnaire consists of Seattle Angina Questionnaire and RAND-12, in addition to social demographic and clinical data, such as sex, height, weight and current medication.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Bergen, Norway, 5021
- Haukeland University Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- ability to speak and read Norwegian fluently
- competent to give informed consent
- referred from cardiologist
- experienced chest pain
- Calcium score = 0 and CCTA must show normal coronary arteries
- received information letter on ongoing research in the Heart department of Haukeland University Hospital
Exclusion Criteria:
- admitted patients
- heart disease or coronary anomalies shown on the CCTA
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Intervention Group
The participants in the intervention group will be provided with extended information of the advantages of the CT examination of the heart's arteries.
This will be given to the participants both orally and written in form of a leaflet.
In addition will they be given the opportunity for a visual go-through of their own calcium score images.
After this they will be informed of the normal examination result.
|
The extended information consists out of an information leaflet and a visual go-through of the participants calcium score images.
The patients are then given the normal examination result.
|
No Intervention: Control group
Control Group receives standard care.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Patient satisfaction: Seattle Angina Questionnaire
Time Frame: 1 month
|
Our primary outcome is to examine whether patients with chest pain with normal coronary arteries experience greater satisfaction with their treatment if they receive extended information and the examination results immediately after the CT examination than those who receive the examination result from their RGP. This is measured with 2 single items in Seattle Angina Questionnaire regarding satisfaction with treatment. Values range from 1-5, 1 is the lowest level of satisfaction, and 5 is the highest level of satisfaction. Greater satisfaction with treatment will be defined by a higher score at follow-up after 1 month. In addition, there is a separate question of patients' trust in the CT examination measured with a VAS-scale , ranging from 1-10, 1 represents lowest possible degree of trust, and 10 represents highest possible degree of trust. Greater trust in the CT-examination is defined by higher scores at follow-up after 1 month. |
1 month
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Worry of having heart disease
Time Frame: 1 month, 6 months, 12 months
|
To examine if patients report less worry of having a heart attack or sudden death after having a CT examination of the heart's arteries, when receiving extended information and the normal examination result immediately after the CT examination. This is measured with a single item in Seattle Angina Questionnaire regarding worry of having heart attack or die suddenly. Values range from 1-5, 1 represents "worry all the time" and 5 represents "never worry". Less worry of having a heart attack or die suddenly will be defined by higher scores at follow-up after 1, 6 and 12 months. |
1 month, 6 months, 12 months
|
Incidence of chest pain
Time Frame: 1 month, 6 months, 12 months
|
To examine if patients with chest pain with normal coronary arteries report less chest pain and/or less use of health care services if they receive extended information and the examination results immediately after the CT examination compared to those who receive the examination result from their RGP. This is measured with 2 single items in Seattle Angina Questionnaire. One item regards limitations in everyday activities because of chest pain. Values range from 1-5, 1 represents lowest level, and 5 represents highest level of function. The second item is about incidence of chest pain the last week. Values range from 1-5, 1 represents high incidence of chest pain and 5 represents no chest pain. Less chest pain is associated with higher scores at all times of follow up, compared to baseline. In addition, clinical data regarding participants use of primary and secondary health care the last 4 weeks is collected at all times of follow-up and is compared to baseline data. |
1 month, 6 months, 12 months
|
Patient satisfaction: Seattle Angina Questionnaire
Time Frame: 6 months, 12 months
|
To examine whether patients with chest pain with normal coronary arteries experience greater satisfaction with their treatment if they receive extended information and the examination results immediately after the CT examination than those who receive the examination result from their RGP. This is measured with 2 single items in Seattle Angina Questionnaire regarding satisfaction with treatment. Values range from 1-5, 1 is the lowest level of satisfaction, and 5 is the highest level of satisfaction. Greater satisfaction with treatment will be defined by a higher score at follow-up after 6 and 12 months. |
6 months, 12 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Tone M Norekvaal, Professor, University of Bergen
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2016/1380
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Chest Pain
-
Clinical Locomotion ScienceOdense University Hospital; University of Southern Denmark; The County of Funen... and other collaboratorsCompletedUndiagnosed Chest Pain | Musculoskeletal Chest Pain | Non-cardiac Chest PainDenmark
-
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam...TerminatedFunctional Chest PainNetherlands
-
Atatürk UniversityCompletedPain, Acute | Pain, ChestTurkey
-
Queen's UniversityCompletedChest Pain Atypical SyndromeCanada
-
Cairo UniversityActive, not recruitingNonspecific Cardiac Chest PainEgypt
-
Universiti Sains MalaysiaCompletedNon Cardiac Chest PainMalaysia
-
Milton S. Hershey Medical CenterCompletedNoncardiac Chest Pain (NCCP)United States
-
Fayoum University HospitalCompleted
-
University of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterCompletedAcute Chest PainUnited States
-
Massachusetts General HospitalBracco Diagnostics, IncCompletedChest Pain SyndromeUnited States
Clinical Trials on Extended information
-
Region SkaneCompletedDermatitis, Allergic ContactSweden
-
University of Auckland, New ZealandCompletedVaccinationNew Zealand
-
Centre des Sciences du Goût et de l'AlimentationInstitut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France; Centre Hospitalier... and other collaboratorsRecruiting
-
Norwegian University of Science and TechnologyUniversity of Bergen; Tannhelsetjenestens Kompetansesenter Vest, TK Vest; Tannlegesenteret...CompletedAnxiety | OdontophobiaNorway
-
University of Southern DenmarkVejle Hospital; Vejle KommuneCompletedHRQOL (Health Related Quality Of Life)Denmark
-
University of North Carolina, Chapel HillDuke University; Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)CompletedColorectal Cancer | Prostate Cancer | Osteoporosis | Preventive ScreeningUnited States
-
National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI)CompletedHealthy VolunteerUnited States
-
Norwegian University of Science and TechnologySt. Olavs HospitalCompletedHealth CommunicationNorway
-
Meir Medical CenterCompletedChildhood ObesityIsrael
-
French Cardiology SocietyCompletedCardiac DiseaseFrance