Light Cured Resin Modified Calcium Silicate Versus Light Cured Calcium Hydroxide in Indirect Pulp Treatment of Primary Molars

January 12, 2019 updated by: Yasmine Ashraf Elbanna, Cairo University

Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Light Cured Resin Modified Calcium Silicate Versus Light Cured Calcium Hydroxide in Indirect Pulp Treatment of Primary Molars

The objective of this study is to explore if light cured resin modified Calcium silicate could result in better clinical and radiographic success if compared to light cured Calcium hydroxide when used in indirect pulp capping treatment in primary molars.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

To evaluate clinical and radiographic success of resin modified calcium silicate in comparison to light cured calcium hydroxide as indirect pulp capping materials in primary molars.

P: Children aged (4-7 years) with deep carious lesions in lower primary second molars indicated for indirect pulp treatment.

I: Indirect pulp treatment using light cured resin modified Calcium Silicate (TheraCal).

C: Indirect pulp treatment using light cured Calcium Hydroxide. O: clinical and radiographic success.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

46

Phase

  • Phase 4

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

4 years to 7 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Medically free children.
  2. Age range from 4-7 years.
  3. Presence of lower second primary molars with deep carious occlusal lesion.
  4. No history of spontaneous pain (reversible pulpitis).
  5. Clinically: Absence of swelling, sinus, fistula, pain on percussion and tooth mobility.
  6. Radiographically: Absence of radiolucent lesions at furcation or periapical region and absence of internal or external root resorption.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Uncooperative children.
  2. Any unmet previous criterion.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Resin Modified Calcium Silicate
light-cured resin-modified calcium silicate-filled base/ liner material designed for direct and indirect pulp capping
new light-cured resin-modified calcium silicate-filled base/ liner material designed for direct and indirect pulp capping
Active Comparator: Light Cured Calcium Hydroxide
gold standard for pulp capping, It allows for the formation of a reparative dentine bridge through cellular differentiation, extracellular matrix secretion and subsequent mineralization.
Calcium hydroxide is the gold standard for pulp capping, allows for the formation of a reparative dentin bridge

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Postoperative pain
Time Frame: 1 month
Pain questionnaire (binary yes/no)
1 month
Postoperative pain
Time Frame: 3 months
Pain questionnaire (binary yes/no)
3 months
Postoperative pain
Time Frame: 6 months
Pain questionnaire (binary yes/no)
6 months
Postoperative pain
Time Frame: 12 months
Pain questionnaire (binary yes/no)
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Swelling
Time Frame: 1 month
Visual examination by the operator (binary yes/no)
1 month
Swelling
Time Frame: 3 months
Visual examination by the operator (binary yes/no)
3 months
Swelling
Time Frame: 6 months
Visual examination by the operator (binary yes/no)
6 months
Swelling
Time Frame: 12 months
Visual examination by the operator (binary yes/no)
12 months
Sinus or fistula
Time Frame: 1 month
Visual examination by the operator (binary yes/no)
1 month
Sinus or fistula
Time Frame: 3 months
Visual examination by the operator (binary yes/no)
3 months
Sinus or fistula
Time Frame: 6 months
Visual examination by the operator (binary yes/no)
6 months
Sinus or fistula
Time Frame: 12 months
Visual examination by the operator (binary yes/no)
12 months
Tooth mobility
Time Frame: 1 month
back of the mirror to check mobility (binary yes/no)
1 month
Tooth mobility
Time Frame: 3 months
back of the mirror to check mobility (binary yes/no)
3 months
Tooth mobility
Time Frame: 6 months
back of the mirror to check mobility (binary yes/no)
6 months
Tooth mobility
Time Frame: 12 months
back of the mirror to check mobility (binary yes/no)
12 months
pain on percussion
Time Frame: 1 month
back of the mirror to check pain on percussion (binary yes/no)
1 month
pain on percussion
Time Frame: 3 months
back of the mirror to check pain on percussion (binary yes/no)
3 months
pain on percussion
Time Frame: 6 months
back of the mirror to check pain on percussion (binary yes/no)
6 months
pain on percussion
Time Frame: 12 months
back of the mirror to check pain on percussion (binary yes/no)
12 months
Occurrence of radiolucent lesions at furcation or periapical region
Time Frame: 1 months
(binary yes/no)
1 months
Occurrence of radiolucent lesions at furcation or periapical region
Time Frame: 3 months
(binary yes/no)
3 months
Occurrence of radiolucent lesions at furcation or periapical region
Time Frame: 6 months
(binary yes/no)
6 months
Occurrence of radiolucent lesions at furcation or periapical region
Time Frame: 12 months
(binary yes/no)
12 months
widening in the periodontal membrane space
Time Frame: 1 month
(binary yes/no)
1 month
widening in the periodontal membrane space
Time Frame: 3 months
(binary yes/no)
3 months
widening in the periodontal membrane space
Time Frame: 6 months
(binary yes/no)
6 months
widening in the periodontal membrane space
Time Frame: 12 months
(binary yes/no)
12 months
presence of internal or external root resorption
Time Frame: 1 month
(binary yes/no)
1 month
presence of internal or external root resorption
Time Frame: 3 months
(binary yes/no)
3 months
presence of internal or external root resorption
Time Frame: 6 months
(binary yes/no)
6 months
presence of internal or external root resorption
Time Frame: 12 months
(binary yes/no)
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

February 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

February 1, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

February 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 27, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 29, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

January 2, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 15, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 12, 2019

Last Verified

January 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Indirect Pulp Treatment

Clinical Trials on Calcium silicate liner

3
Subscribe