Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms Among Rescuers at Risk

March 19, 2019 updated by: University of Bern

Rescuers at Risk: Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms Differ Among Police Officers, Fire Fighters, Ambulance Personnel, and Emergency and Psychiatric Nurses

This cross-sectional, anonymous online survey aims to examine how salient variables influence PTSS, well-being, and suicidal ideation across the following professions of rescue workers: firefighters, ambulance personnel, police officers, and emergency and psychiatric nurses. PTSS, coping strategies, well-being, suicidal ideation, previously experienced and work-related trauma, and self-efficacy were measured and analyzed using multiple regression and structural equation modeling.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Employees of rescue and emergency services are at a risk of posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) due to exposure to trauma and work-related stressors. Salient predictors for the development of PTSS among rescue workers have been identified; however, little is known about how predictors (e.g. coping strategies) differ among professions requiring repeated engagement in emergencies. The present survey examines how these variables influence PTSS, well-being, and suicidal ideation across different professions of rescue Workers using multiple regression and structural equation modeling.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

1001

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bern, Switzerland, 3000
        • University Hospital of Psychiatry, University of Bern

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Employees of rescue and emergency services in the canton Bern, Switzerland: - Firefighters of the canton Bern

  • Ambulance personnel of the canton Bern
  • Police officers of the canton Bern
  • Emergency nurses of the University Hospital of Bern
  • Psychiatric nurses of University Hospital of Psychiatry, Bern

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Employee at the rescue or emergency services. The participation in the anonymous online study is voluntary and promoted by the department heads at the places of work corresponding to the studied professions. No ethical approval is needed as the survey was voluntary and anonymous and participants gave consent to use the data with their participation.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • None

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Police officers
Police officers from the cantonal police forces in Bern, Switzerland
Firefighters
Firefighters from the professional fire service of the Canton Bern, Switzerland
Ambulance personnel
Ambulance personnel of the Canton Bern, Switzerland
Emergency nurses
Emergency nurses of the Emergency Unit of the University Hospital of Bern, Switzerland
Psychiatric nurses
Psychiatric nurses of the University Hospital of Psychiatry, University of Bern, Switzerland

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
PTSS-10
Time Frame: at baseline
Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms assessed with the Post Traumatic Symptom Scale, a self-rating scale used in screening and follow-up studies on catastrophe that measures the most common posttraumatic symptoms (sleep disorders, nightmares, fear of reminders, etc.)
at baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Well-being
Time Frame: at baseline
Mental well-being assessed with the German version of the shortest General Health Questionnaire 12 (GHQ-12). Psychological distress and psychiatric disorders were assessed with the German Version of the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI).
at baseline
Suicidal Ideation
Time Frame: within the last 12 months before the survey
Participants were asked if they had suicidal ideation in the 12 months prior to the questionnaire
within the last 12 months before the survey
Psychological distress and psychiatric disorders
Time Frame: at baseline
German Version of the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI). The 53-item self-report questionnaire measures symptoms of general psychopathology.
at baseline

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Self-efficacy
Time Frame: at baseline
Self-efficacy was measured using the General Perceived Self-Efficacy Scale, a 10-item self-report instrument for personality diagnostics based on Banduras's concept of perceived self-efficacy that measures the general optimistic competence expectation
at baseline
Coping Strategies
Time Frame: at baseline
5-point Likert scale, ranging from a score of 1, indicating "not helpful"; to 5, "very helpful." According to the operationalization of Coolidge, coping strategies were divided into three main subscales: I) problem-focused coping strategies, which was comprised of the subscales of "instrumental support" (getting help and advice from psychologic professionals) and "active job coping" (debriefing with operation team, supervisor, and work colleagues); II) dysfunctional coping strategies, which included "substance use" (alcohol or medication), "avoidance" (avoidance of situations and emotions associated with the stressful/traumatic situation), and "self-distraction" (turning to work or other activities to take the mind off the stressful situation); III) emotion-focused coping strategy (humor, getting emotional support from close friends, thinking about the positive aspects of the job).
at baseline
The burden of stressful job-related circumstances
Time Frame: at baseline
The burden of stressful job-related circumstances, such as dealing with situations including people (aggressive and violent people, dealing with deaths or suicide, threats, dealing with relatives, involvement of children) and job-related conditions (incorrect or wrong information about the emergency situation, shift work, time pressure). Participants stated if they had ever experienced a presented situation, and if so, whether the situation caused a light or heavy stress burden.
at baseline
work-unrelated trauma
Time Frame: at baseline
Number of previous experienced work-unrelated trauma
at baseline
work-related trauma
Time Frame: at baseline
Number of experienced trauma at work
at baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Leila Soravia, Ph.D., University Hospital of Psychiatry, University of Bern

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

June 1, 2014

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

May 1, 2015

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

May 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 4, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 12, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

February 15, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

March 22, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 19, 2019

Last Verified

March 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PTSD2014

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on PTSD

Clinical Trials on No Intervention: anonymous online survey

Subscribe