Single Time Management Diseases in Pediatric Traumatology

July 18, 2019 updated by: Fondation Lenval

Single Time Management for Seven Common Disease in Pediatric Traumatology. A Monocentric Prospective Study

A recent internal study evaluating the relevance of the visit to traumatology consultation in our establishment highlight that 49.3% of consultations were not relevant passages. The project consists of individualizing 5 to 6 pathologies and to create care sheets and patient sheets to be given to the care teams and patients when the pathology lends itself to it. The aim is to reduce the irrelevant passage rate during these consultations, which is the source of absence from iterative work for parents, collateral expenses (toll, parking), absence from school for the children, unjustified expenses and X-ray examination unnecessary most often.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The Pediatric Orthopedics and Traumatology department proposes a reform of the care in Traumatology of the children in order to improve and homogenize the care for a better relevance of these.

A recent internal study (June 2018) evaluating the relevance of the visit to traumatology consultation in our establishment to highlight that 49.3% of consultations were not relevant passages (Benign diseases of sprained ankle type, muscular contusion or simple bone removals). Indeed, these specialist consultations are currently filled by pathologies of simple treatment that do not require medical follow-up (neither clinical nor radiological follow-up).

The project consists of individualizing 5 to 6 pathologies found in consultation recurrently which the scientific literature has established that their follow-up is not justified, and to create care sheets and patient sheets to be given to the care teams and patients when the pathology lends itself to it. These cards will include all the management of the pathology of the definition itself, including the treatment and expected outcomes.

The aim is to reduce the irrelevant passage rate during these consultations, which is the source of absence from iterative work for parents, collateral expenses (toll, parking), absence from school for the children, unjustified expenses and X-ray examination unnecessary most often.

The expected benefit is parental and child satisfaction, a time saving for the practitioner that he can reinvest in consultations for patients who are in fact a specialist opinion and a relative budget saving for the establishment.

The method of study of the decline of irrelevant consultations will be made by a systematic review of each reason for consultation over a period of 3 months after implementation of the cards and study of the percentage of irrelevant consultation over the same period. The objective pursued is a drop in attendance of at least 25% of consultations deemed irrelevant in Traumatology, associated with a satisfaction rate of parents greater than 90%.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

150

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Nice, France
        • Fondation Lenval Hopitaux Pediatriques de Nice Chu Lenval

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

1 year to 18 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Child from 1 to 18 years old suffering an isolated minor trauma presenting at the Lenval Foundation emergency services.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 0-18 years
  • Positive diagnosis of elbow haemarthrosis, radial salter 1 fracture, fibula fracture 1 fracture, radial butter ball fracture, simple ankle sprain, simple knee sprain, fracture of the middle third of the clavicle .........
  • No other associated anomaly

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Refusal of the family ..............................................
  • No understanding of the instructions ...............................
  • Unaffiliated patient social security ..................................
  • No French speaking .............

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
minor trauma
Child from 1 to 18 years old suffering an isolated minor trauma presenting at the hospital emergency services.
following the management of the patient's fracture in the emergency department, the patients / parents are recalled 2 months (J60) after the visit to the emergency room, and are interviewed by following the pre-established interrogation form, which checks the good agreement of the patient. treatment performed with the given sheet and recommendations, and assesses the satisfaction.
Other Names:
  • medical recommendation sheet

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of the number of patients routinely summoned to post-emergency trauma consultation
Time Frame: at 6 months
decrease in the number of patients coming back for an unjustified consultation for these 4 pathologies by comparing the period from 6 months preceding the start of the protocol to a period of 6 months after starting the protocol.
at 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
measurement of patient satisfaction
Time Frame: at 60 days after inclusion
Call by phone the patient to measure the satisfaction by a standard questionnaire. the scale is composed of 7 closed questions on the satisfaction of care in emergencies, the follow-up of the patient by a city doctor. the answers are yes or no.
at 60 days after inclusion
compliance of care
Time Frame: at 60 days after inclusion
call by phone the patient to verify the good compliance of the care. The improvement of the care will be evaluated according to the number of patient treated for one of these pathologies having felt the need to consult another doctor / orthopedic surgeon that is envisaged by the protocol (in the days following emergency room consultation).
at 60 days after inclusion

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: RAMPAL VIRGINIE, MD, Fondation Lenval - Nice Children Hospital CHU-Lenval

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 2, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 14, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

June 28, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 21, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 21, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

February 22, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 19, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 18, 2019

Last Verified

February 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 18-HPNCL-06

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Fractures, Bone

Clinical Trials on minor trauma

3
Subscribe