Platelet-Rich Plasma in the Treatment of Patients With Idiopathic Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

February 13, 2020 updated by: Reham Magdy, Mansoura University
This is a randomized controlled trial in a cohort of Egyptian patients suffered from mild to moderate idiopathic carpal tunnel. They were randomly divided into two groups. Group 1: patients received ultrasound-guided platelet-rich plasma injection and group 2 patients received ultrasound-guided corticosteroid injection. The outcome measures were assessed via Visual Analogue Scale, the Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire, electrophysiological findings in sensory and motor function of the median nerve and morphological changes of median nerve detected by ultrasound.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Intervention:

PRP Injection Group(PRP-inj-G) - This group included 49 patients (40 females and 9 males). Their age ranged from 20 to 60 years.

PRP Preparation: 16 ml of blood was obtained from each patient using special PRP kits (GD medical pharma, Dutch company). The blood was collected on citrated tubes with a mixing ratio of 9:1 by volume. Tubes underwent 1st centrifugation at speed of 3000 rpm (704g) for 3 minutes (to separate red blood cells from plasma). Plasma was then removed by syringe and then placed into another sterile tube with no anticoagulant and then underwent 2nd centrifugation at speed of at 4000 rpm (1252g) for 15 min. The supernatant platelet-poor plasma was then removed leaving 2 ml of PRP pellets in the sediment, and suspend the PRP pellets by gentle shaking of the tube. PRP is activated by adding 200 μl of 0.025 calcium chloride(Dhurat and Sukesh, 2014).

Ultrasound-Guided Injection: Proper preparation with an antiseptic solution of skin overlying the point of injection was performed guided by ultrasonography (Siemens Acuson P300 machine). With the palm facing upward and the wrist joint in slight extension, the MN will be recognized at the inlet of the CT(Wu et al., 2017). The injection was guided by ultrasound with the use of the ulnar in-plane technique(Lee et al., 2014). Ulnar artery was identified by the means of Doppler imaging, and a 25-gauge needle was introduced from the ulnar side of the wrist between CT and MN. Then the entire CT was scanned to confirm that the injection had dispersed through the proximal to the distal area of the CT. All patients were observed for 30 minutes post-injection for the possibility of dysesthesia or bleeding(Wu et al., 2017).

PRP injection: A 25-gauge needle was gently introduced one cm proximal to the distal wrist-flexion crease just to the ulnar side of the palmaris longus tendon and 2 ml of PRP was injected into the CT.

Steroid injection Group(St-inj-G) - included 49 patients (41 females and 8 males)with their age ranged from 20 to 60 years. A single injection of methylprednisolone acetate 40 mg/ml using a technique similar to that described for the PRP injection

Post-injection care for both groups:

  • Some patients may have minimal to moderate discomfort after injection. So, to control pain, patients should apply ice on the injection site and also modify activity as tolerated.
  • Rest for one day.
  • The patient immediately returns to work two days after injection.
  • Pain medication in the form of paracetamol only was allowed for the next 3 months if needed. The patients were instructed to stop analgesics 48 hours before the visit to allow proper symptoms assessment.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Mansoura, Egypt, 35516
        • Mansoura University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with mild-to-moderate idiopathic CTS with clinical manifestations failed to respond to conservative treatment ( such as splint, medications, Physical therapy) for at least 3 months and they were diagnosed by electrophysiological study and musculoskeletal ultrasound.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diabetes
  • Hypothyroidism
  • Rheumatoid arthritis
  • Previous carpal tunnel decompressive surgery
  • Cervical radiculopathy, polyneuropathy, brachial plexopathy, traumatic nerve injury, thoracic outlet syndrome
  • Previous corticosteroid injection into the carpal tunnel in the preceding 4 weeks
  • Anemia (hemoglobin <10gm%)
  • Coagulopathy
  • Pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: PRP Injection Group
PRP Preparation: 16 ml of blood was obtained from each patient using special PRP kits (GD medical pharma, Dutch company). The blood was collected on citrated tubes with a mixing ratio of 9:1 by volume. Tubes underwent 1st centrifugation at speed of 3000 rpm (704g) for 3 minutes (to separate red blood cells from plasma). Plasma was then removed by syringe and then placed into another sterile tube with no anticoagulant and then underwent 2nd centrifugation at speed of at 4000 rpm (1252g) for 15 min. The supernatant platelet-poor plasma was then removed leaving 2 ml of PRP pellets in the sediment, and suspend the PRP pellets by gentle shaking of the tube. PRP is activated by adding 200 μl of 0.025 calcium chloride(Dhurat and Sukesh, 2014).
Platelet-Rich Plasma Injection Group
Active Comparator: Steroid injection Group
A single injection of methylprednisolone acetate 40 mg/ml using a technique similar to that described for the PRP injection
Platelet-Rich Plasma Injection Group

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain improvement
Time Frame: three months
The VAS-pain score is composed of a continuous horizontal line. This line is 100 mm in length. To measure the intensity of pain, the score is anchored by (0 score = no pain) at one end and (100 score = worst imaginable pain) on the other end. The patient places a mark to the VAS line at the point which represents the intensity of his pain.
three months
Function improvement
Time Frame: three months
The Boston CT Questionnaire (BCTQ) is a patient-based outcome measure that was designed specifically for CTS patients. BCTQ has 2 distinct scales, the Symptom Severity Scale (BCTQ-SSS) containing 11 questions and the Functional Status Scale (BCTQ-FSS) containing 8 items. All questions were rated for degree of difficulty on a 5points scale. Each scale producesa final average score (sum of the scores divided by number of items) with a higher score indicative of greater disability. The BCTQ was used as an outcome measure in clinical trials, and has been reported as a validity and reliable tool for assessment of CTS.
three months
Edema
Time Frame: three months
US examination of the m-CSA for all patients was performed using a 7-13 MHz linear array probe with a calibrated device (Siemens, Acuson P300 apparatus) on the same day of EDX examination and clinical evaluation. All US examinations were performed with the wrists at the neutral position. The US examiner applied a minimal pressure force to avoid induction of artificial nerve deformation. Three measurements of the m-CSA at the level of most-protuberant portion of the pisiform bone were performed. The mean of the three measurements is calculated.
three months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 16, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 3, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

March 5, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 17, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 13, 2020

Last Verified

February 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Clinical Trials on Platelet-Rich Plasma Injection Group

3
Subscribe