The Peer-Based Retention of People Who Use Drugs in Rural Research (PROUD-R2)

December 20, 2023 updated by: P. Todd Korthuis, MD, Oregon Health and Science University
The purpose of this study is to, through several aims, test the effectiveness of peer-driven intervention and inform methods to optimize engagement in research in people who use drugs (PWUD) in rural America.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This study builds on the National Rural Opioids Initiative (NROI), a multi-state consortium studying access to care, overdose, and infectious consequences of opioid use disorder (OUD) in Rural America. It includes counties in rural Oregon and Appalachian Kentucky and Ohio with high rates of drug overdose.

Aim 1: Conduct a randomized trial to evaluate the effectiveness of a peer-driven study retention intervention for retaining PWUD in Kentucky, Ohio, and Oregon Rural Opioid Initiative sites.

Aim 2: Elicit preferences of PWUD in the Kentucky, Ohio, and Oregon Rural Opioid Initiative sites Aim 2a: Administer baseline survey of discrete choice experiment preferences for participating in clinical trials of potential medical innovations (e.g. new treatments for OUD, HIV, and HCV vaccination). Aim 2a will be accomplished as part of the NROI studies. The data will then be merged for PROUD-R² analyses.

Aim 2b: Compare participant survey preferences regarding willingness to participate in clinical trials at baseline, 6, and 12 months.

Aim 3: Explore participant perceptions of clinical research participation and retention among PWUD in rural America.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

850

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30322
        • Emory University
    • Kentucky
      • Lexington, Kentucky, United States, 40506
        • University of Kentucky
    • Ohio
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43210
        • Ohio State University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

NROI eligibility criteria: Participants are eligible to enroll in the NROI if they 1) live in the study area, 2) have recently injected drugs or report opioid use to get high without injection, and 3) are age 18 or older.

NROI participants enrolled after April 2019 are eligible to participate in the PROUD R2 study.

Participants enrolling as study buddies will be eligible if they 1) live in the study area, 2) are age 18 or older; they do not need to have recent or past substance use to qualify.

No eligible participants are excluded.

Exclusion Criteria:

Under 18 years of age

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Retention Video
Participants the peer-driven retention arm will receive video-based and in-person training from Retention Specialists on how to encourage study retention. Participants will watch a 7 minute video that standardizes retention messages. A brief face-to-face conversation with the Retention Specialist follows the video viewing to answer questions and reinforce video messages. At the end of the training, participants receive information about their recruit(s) who consented to release their information to their recruiters. Peers remind their enrolled "study buddy" to attend their scheduled follow up assessments. Participants meet with a study Retention Specialist by phone or in person, at 3 and 9 months after enrollment to answer questions about peer retention strategies and remind participants of their peers' contact information and follow-up schedules.
Participants assigned to the retention training arm will watch a brief training video that will include information on how to retain peers in clinical trials.
No Intervention: Standard Retention Strategy
Control arm: At NROI enrollment, all participants provide detailed information to assist with retention and/or contact for future research, and contact information for up to three people who should know how to reach the participant if contact information changes. Participants randomized to receive the standard retention strategy are contacted at the mid-point of each follow-up interval (i.e., at 3-month post enrollment and 9-months post-enrollment) to update locator information and remind them about their follow-up appointment date. Study associates contact the participant using their contact information and, if not successful, will try to reach one of their contacts in the locator form.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
12 Month Retention Rate
Time Frame: 12 months
Participants receiving the peer retention intervention will have 20% higher retention at 12 months (primary outcome) than those receiving the standard retention approach, alone.
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
6 Month Retention Rate
Time Frame: 6 months
Participants receiving the peer retention intervention will have higher retention at 6 months (secondary outcome) compared with those receiving the standard retention approach, alone.
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Todd Korthuis, MD, MPH, Oregon Health and Science University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 31, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 25, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

July 25, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 19, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 19, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

March 21, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 22, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 20, 2023

Last Verified

December 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PROUD-R2

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe