INYBI Tool in Chronic Neck Pain

October 27, 2019 updated by: Alberto Marcos Heredia-Rizo, University of Seville

Effectiveness of a New Tool (INYBI) in Individuals With Chronic Non-specific Neck Pain.

Objectives: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of using a manual inhibition technique for the suboccipital muscles compared with the use of the so-called INYBI tool in individuals with chronic non-specific neck pain, and the compare the results of using both approaches on pain relief, cervical range of motion neck and vertical maximum mouth opening.

Design: Quantitative, experimental, longitudinal, prospective, and double blinded study.

Subjects: Patients between 18 and 40 years, with chronic non-specific neck pain of at least 3 months of evolution.

Methods: The experimental group will undergo a 5 minutes intervention for the suboccipital muscles using the INYBI tool. The control group will receive a 5 minutes of treatment involving the suboccipital muscles manual inhibition technique.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

58

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Sevilla, Spain, 41009
        • University of Sevilla

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 40 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical diagnosis of non-specific mechanical neck pain.
  • Pain of more than 3 months of duration.
  • Pain between the occiput and the third dorsal vertebra.
  • Willingness to participate in the treatment and in the follow-up measurements
  • Neck pain reproduced by neck movements or palpation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cognitive impairment or inability to communicate.
  • Having received manual therapy in the last two months before recruitment.
  • Having received anti-inflammatory treatment, antidepressants or muscle relaxants in the last 72 hours.
  • Any contraindication to treatment or evaluation procedures.
  • Diagnosis of systemic diseases
  • Diagnosis of fibromyalgia
  • Pregnancy
  • Signs of spinal nerve root compression
  • Previous whiplash
  • Any diagnosed possible cause for their neck pain (infection, cancer, spinal stenosis)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: INIBY tool
Patients will undergo a single treatment session consisting of applying a suboccipital muscle inhibition technique using the so-called INYBI tool. The treatment session will last approximately 5 minutes
Patients will lie down in supine position so that the INYBI tool will contact the suboccipital muscles at the posterior arch of the atlas. The therapist will adapt the height of the tool for each individual. All patients will use the softest head of the device. A 50Hz vibration speed will be set sup during 5 minutes.
Active Comparator: Manual suboccipital inhibition
Patients will receive a single treatment session consisting of the use of the manual suboccipital muscles inhibition technique.The treatment session will last approximately 5 minutes
Patients will lie down in supine position.The therapist will be seated at the head of the treatment table. The therapist will keep the metacarpophalangeal joints in a flexed position, while therapists fingertips of both hands will contact with the suboccipital muscles at the posterior arch of the atlas.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pressure pain threshold (PPT) in the evaluated muscles. The PPT levels will be evaluated in Kilograms / cm2
Time Frame: From baseline to immediately after treatment.
PPT levels, defined as the minimum necessary pressure to evoke pain will be evaluated using a handheld electronic pressure algometer.
From baseline to immediately after treatment.
Active cervical range of movement (ROM). The range of movement will be assessed in degrees
Time Frame: From baseline to immediately after treatment.
Flexion, extension, left and right side flexion, and left and right rotation will be assessed using a digital inclinometer.
From baseline to immediately after treatment.
Pain free vertical mouth opening. This outcome will be evaluated in centimeters.
Time Frame: From baseline to immediately after treatment.
Maximum pain free vertical mouth opening will be assessed using a digital caliper that will place between the incisors 11, 21, 31 y 41.
From baseline to immediately after treatment.
Atlas rotation ROM, assessed in degrees
Time Frame: From baseline to immediately after treatment.
The atlas bone left and right rotation ROM will be assessed using the flexion-rotation test. For this test, with the participant in supine position, the maximum mobility in head rotation while keeping maximum passive neck flexion will be assessed
From baseline to immediately after treatment.
Self-reported pain intensity
Time Frame: From baseline to immediately after treatment.
Self-perceived pain intensity will be evaluated during all active cervical movements by a 0 to 10 Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), where 0 denotes no pain at all, and 10 denotes the maximum possible pain
From baseline to immediately after treatment.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Alberto Heredia-Rizo, PhD, Physiotherapy Department, University of Sevilla, Spain

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 24, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 27, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

September 27, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 27, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 2, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

April 3, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 29, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 27, 2019

Last Verified

October 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • INYBI tool

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neck Pain

Clinical Trials on INYBI tool

3
Subscribe