Sub-Occipital Muscles Inhibition Technique Verses Cranio Cervical Flexion Exercise for Mechanical Neck Pain

February 16, 2021 updated by: Riphah International University

Effects of Sub-Occipital Muscles Inhibition Technique and Cranio Cervical Flexion Exercise for Mechanical Neck Pain

The aim of this research is to determine the Effects of Sub-Occipital Muscles Inhibition Technique and Cranio Cervical Flexion Exercise for Mechanical Neck Pain. A randomized control trail will conduct at Railway general hospital(IIMCT). The sample size will be 68. TheParticipants will bedividing into two groups,34 participants in Group A (receive the Sub-Occipital Muscles Inhibition Technique) and 34 in Group B (receive Cranio Cervical Flexion Exercise). The study duration will 6 months. Purposive non probability sampling technique will be applied. Both male and female participants with mechanical neck pain will be include. Tools use in this study areNumerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), Neck Disability Index (NDI),Goniometer, Pressure Biofeedback unit, Digital Camera. Data analyzed through SPSS version 21.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Mechanical neck pain (MNP) is generalized neck or shoulder pain with mechanical characteristics (including symptoms provoked by neck postures, neck movement, or palpation of the cervical musculature). It has become an increasing problem causing functional disability in large populations. It is one of the most common musculoskeletal disorders in the neck region. Neck pain of mechanical origin constitutes approximately 45% - 50% of all neck pain. The variation in the prevalence ranges from 43.0% of the Swedish population, 34.4% of Norwegian adult population and In North America (Saskatchewan, Canada) lifetime prevalence of neck pain is 66.7%. The reason for this may lie in the increasing time spent on office and computer work. Also, a significant proportion of mechanical neck disorders consist of whiplash associated disorders (WAD), with a higher prevalence in women (22%) than in men (16%). Strong evidence suggests biomechanical factors, including prolonged computer use, and posture and repetitive movements are associated with the development of neck pain. Cervical joint dysfunction is the main cause of mechanical neck pain. One of the predominant mechanical events causing neck pain, is impaired stability of the cervical spine, which is often attributed to disturbances in motor control over the cervical spine. The stability of the cervical spine is dependent on the deep neck flexor and neck extensor muscles. The longuscolli and capitis are principal deep neck flexor muscles. In contrast, the suboccipital muscles are principal neck extensors of the upper cervical spine and are composed of the rectus capitis posterior major (RCPM), rectus capitis posterior minor (RCPm), obliquuscapitis superior (OCS), and obliquuscapitis inferior (OCI). There are varieties of physiotherapy interventions for the management of Mechanical neck pain such as spinal joint manipulation, mobilization techniques, massage techniques, suboccipital muscle inhibition technique, craniocervical flexion exercise, soft tissue techniques and trigger point [TrP] treatment , needling, active release techniques, stretches (static and isometric ), traction and various electro modalities.A very limited evidence found on comparison on effectiveness of sub occipital muscle release and Cranio-cervical flexion exercise. Previous studies only find out immediate effect (one session) on Cervical ROM and CVA. To fill the gap, this study is formulated to determine the effects of sub occipital muscle release and Cranio-cervical flexion exercise on ROM in the cervical spine and Cranio-vertebral angle (CVA) in mechanical neck pain. Study will find out most effective treatment for management of mechanical neck pain and would contribute to educate and treat the patient with most simple and effective treatment approach.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

68

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Punjab
      • Rawalpindi, Punjab, Pakistan, 46000
        • Pakistan Railway General Hospital.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

13 years to 33 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • At least five points on the neck disability index (NDI)
  • 3 to 6 points in the numerical pain rating scale (NPRS)
  • pain from more than 3 months
  • Subjects were included if they had FHP as determined by the presence of a CVA < 48
  • Subjects will include if they have flexion <80°, extension<70°, lateral flexion <20° and rotation <90

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of traffic accidents
  • History of lower extremity fracture and surgery
  • Acute low back and neck pain
  • History of lumbar and cervical herniated intervertebral disk and spinal stenosis
  • History of cervical spine surgery and trauma
  • History of vascular disease in the head and neck
  • Progressive neuro logical deficits

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Cervical Rang of Motion Exercises.
Cervical exercises for mechanical neck pain.
Suboccipital Inhibition Technique For 2min And Conventional Treatment Hot Pack For 10 To 15 Mints And Muscle Energy Technique(Post Facilitation Stretch) 5 Reps × 1 Set Sessions: 2 TIME A WEEK FOR 4 CONSECUTIVE WEEKS
Experimental: Cervical Exercises.
Cervical exercises for the management of mechanical neck pain.
Cranio cervical flexion exercises10 repetitions for 10 seconds and conventional treatment hot pack for 10 to 15 mints and muscle energy technique(post facilitation stretch) 5 reps × 1 set Sessions: 2 TIME A WEEK FOR 4 CONSECUTIVE WEEKS

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Neck disability index
Time Frame: 4th day.
Changes from base line Northwick disability index was developed first in Northwick Park hospital, England. It was designed to measure the neck pain and disability over time. It consists of 10, five parts sections. At the end, score is calculated by dividing the obtained score by total (50) multiplied by 100.
4th day.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Numeric Pain Rating scale.
Time Frame: 4th day
Changes from base Line Numeric Pain rating scale is a scale for pain starting from 0-10. Where 0 indicate no pain and 10 indicate severe pain.
4th day
Cranio vertebral angle
Time Frame: 4th day
Changes from the Baseline Cranio vertebral angle will taken with the help of digital camera.
4th day
Rang of Motion of cervical spine.
Time Frame: 4th day
Changes from the Baseline range of Motion of cervical spine willtake with the Help of Goniometer.
4th day
Cervical flexion exercise.
Time Frame: 4th day
Changes from the Baseline cervical flexion exercise will access by pressure biofeedback unit.
4th day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 11, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 30, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

October 30, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 4, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 10, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

September 11, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 17, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 16, 2021

Last Verified

February 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • REC/00682 Robina Malik

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cervical Pain

Clinical Trials on Suboccipital Inhibition Technique

3
Subscribe