Effects of Mobilization Versus Manipulation on Function in Participants Reporting CAI

April 16, 2019 updated by: Cameron Bolton, Shenandoah University

Effects of Mobilization Versus Manipulation on Function in Participants Reporting Chronic Ankle Instability

The investigator's purpose is to compare the effects of talocrural joint mobilization with movement versus thrust mobilization on functional performance in subjects reporting chronic ankle instability (CAI).

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Detailed Description

Joint mobilizations are reported to increase range of motion (ROM), postural control and proprioception, and decrease pain in individuals with CAI. However, there is no research comparing the effects of mobilization with movement (MWM) versus thrust mobilization (TM) directed at the talocrural joint on functional performance in this population.

Inclusion and exclusion criterion have been established utilizing the International Ankle Consortium guidelines. Using a convenience sampling, participants will be randomized into the MWM or TM group.

The MWM group will receive manual therapy with the following protocol: the participant will be relaxed and standing in a staggered stance with the involved foot on an eight inch step and both feet facing forward . The clinician will be positioned in front of the participant's leg and a non-elastic belt will be placed around the distal leg of the participant and the clinician's pelvis. The clinician will then apply a sustained posteroanterior glide to the tibia through the belt by leaning backwards, while stabilizing the fixed talus and forefoot with both hands. The participant will perform a slow lunge until the end range of motion without their heel lifting off the ground. The belt will be kept perpendicular to the tibia throughout the movement and 2 sets of 10 repetitions will be applied.

The talocrural joint TM will be a high velocity low amplitude manual therapy technique. This technique will be applied with the participant in the supine position on a plinth. The clinician grasps the foot with one hand with the fifth finger contacting the anterior surface of the ankle at the talus. The other hand reinforces the contact points and both thumbs are placed on the sole of the participant's foot. The clinician gives slight caudal traction focused on the talocrural joint with the ankle dorsiflexed and everted. The therapist then applies a high-velocity thrust distraction technique to the talocrural joint. Only one thrust will be applied and no audible cavitation is required. Each manual therapy technique will be performed once.

An examiner, who is blinded to involved limb and group allocation, will perform a baseline, immediate follow-up, and one-week follow-up examination of range of motion and functional performance. The participants will complete subjective outcome measures at baseline, immediately post intervention, and at 1 week post intervention including the Foot and Ankle Ability Measurement (FAAM), FAAM-Sport, and the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT). Participants will also complete baseline, immediate follow-up, and one-week follow up assessments of the Multiple Hop Test (MHT), three directions of the Star Excursion Balance test (SEBT), and weight bearing lunge test (WBLT).

Data analysis will be performed using International Business Machines Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS). Alpha level will be set p<0.05. Expecting to utilize separate 2 x 2 repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) to assess changes in the FAAM, FAAM-Sport, CAIT, MHT, WBLT, and three directions of the SEBT.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Cameron Bolton, PT, DPT
  • Phone Number: 5405426540
  • Email: cbolton16@su.edu

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Sheri Hale, PT, PhD
  • Phone Number: 5405457240
  • Email: shale2@su.edu

Study Locations

    • Virginia
      • Winchester, Virginia, United States, 22601
        • Shenandoah University
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Emily Blum, SPT
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Lindsey Rodriguez, SPT
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Daphne Batista, SPT
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Andrea Choo, SPT
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Brianna Virzi, SPT
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • John Knowlton, SPT
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Tiffany Reynolds, SPT
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Laura D'Costa, SPT

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 35 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Criteria:

As adapted from the position statement from the International Ankle Consortium.

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18-35 years of age
  • A history of at least 1 significant ankle sprain (The initial sprain must have occurred at least 12 months prior to study enrollment, associated with inflammatory symptoms (pain, swelling, etc), created at least 1 interrupted day of desired physical activity)
  • The most recent injury must have occurred more than 3 months prior to study enrollment.
  • A history of the previously injured ankle joint "giving way" and/or recurrent sprain and/or "feelings of instability."
  • Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT) < 24
  • Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM)42: ADL scale < 90%, Sport scale < 80%

Exclusion Criteria:

  • A history of previous surgeries to the musculoskeletal structures (i.e., bones, joint structures, nerves) in either limb of the lower extremity.
  • A history of a fracture in either limb of the lower extremity requiring realignment
  • Acute injury to musculoskeletal structures of other joints of the lower extremity in the previous 3 months, which impacted joint integrity and function (i.e., sprains, fractures) resulting in at least 1 interrupted day of desired physical activity

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Mobilization with Movement
A weight- bearing mobilization directed to the talocrural joint in a standing position.
The MWM group will receive manual therapy with the following protocol: the participant will be relaxed and standing in a staggered stance with the involved foot on an eight-inch step and both feet facing forward. The clinician will be positioned in front of the participant's leg and a non-elastic belt will be placed around the distal leg of the participant and the clinician's pelvis. The clinician will then apply a sustained posteroanterior glide to the tibia through the belt by leaning backwards, while stabilizing the fixed talus and forefoot with both hands. The participant will perform a slow lunge until the end range of motion without their heel lifting off the ground. The belt will be kept perpendicular to the tibia throughout the movement and 2 sets of 10 repetitions will be applied.
EXPERIMENTAL: Thrust Mobilization
A high velocity, low amplitude thrust mobilization directed to the talocrural joint with the participant in a non-weight bearing position.
The talocrural joint TM will be a high velocity low amplitude manual therapy technique. This technique will be applied with the participant in the supine position on a plinth. The clinician grasps the foot with one hand with the fifth finger contacting the anterior surface of the ankle at the talus. The other hand reinforces the contact points and both thumbs are placed on the sole of the participant's foot. The clinician gives slight caudal traction focused on the talocrural joint with the ankle dorsiflexed and everted. The therapist then applies a high-velocity thrust distraction technique to the talocrural joint. Only one thrust will be applied and no audible cavitation is required. This manual therapy technique will be performed once.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in baseline Multiple Hop Test immediately after intervention and at 1 week follow-up.
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after intervention, and 1 week
The participants will hop between 10 pieces of white 2 x 2 cm tape. Participants will be instructed to hop once between each numbered marker and avoid any postural corrections. Participants will be allowed to progress if they were able to stand still keeping their hands on their hips at each marker. Three trials on each leg will be performed and amount of time to complete trial, number of fixed-support, and change-in-support balance strategies will be recorded. The average of the three trials will be taken.
Baseline, immediately after intervention, and 1 week
Change in baseline weight bearing lunge test (WBLT) immediately after intervention and at 1 week follow-up.
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after intervention, and 1 week
Weight-bearing dorsiflexion range of motion (ROM) will be measured using the lunge test with a digital inclinometer (Acumar Single Digital Inclinometer Model ACU001) placed on a marked spot 15 cm below the base of the tibial tuberosity. Participants will place their hands on the wall and touch a vertical line with their knee, while keeping their knee in line with their second toe and their heel on the ground. Participants will perform three trials on either leg and the average of three test trials will be recorded.
Baseline, immediately after intervention, and 1 week
Change in baseline Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT) immediately after intervention and at 1 week follow-up.
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after intervention, and 1 week
Each participant is asked to maintain single-limb stance, with hands on their hips, while reaching in anterior, posteromedial, and posterolateral directions.
Baseline, immediately after intervention, and 1 week
Change in baseline Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM)- Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Subscale immediately after intervention and at 1 week follow-up.
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after intervention, and 1 week
The FAAM- ADL is a 21-item tool that is designed to assess functional limitations related to foot and ankle conditions. Each item is scored on a Likert scale; 0 (unable to do) to 4 (no difficulty) and has total point value of 84 points, reported as a percent value.
Baseline, immediately after intervention, and 1 week
Change in baseline Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM)- Sport subscale immediately after intervention and at 1 week follow-up.
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after intervention, and 1 week
The FAAM- Sport is a 7-item tool that is a sub-scale of the FAAM. Each item is scored on a Likert scale; 0 (unable to do) to 4 (no difficulty) with a total point value of 28 points, reported as a percent value.
Baseline, immediately after intervention, and 1 week
Change in baseline Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT) immediately after intervention and at 1 week follow-up.
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after intervention, and 1 week
9-item questionnaire that helps discriminate and measure the severity of functional ankle instability.
Baseline, immediately after intervention, and 1 week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Cameron Bolton, PT, DPT, Shenandoah University Division of Physical Therapy

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ANTICIPATED)

April 1, 2019

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 1, 2019

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 2, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 16, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

April 17, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

April 17, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 16, 2019

Last Verified

April 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 668

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ankle Sprains

Clinical Trials on Mobilization with Movement

3
Subscribe