- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03941717
Testing the Effectiveness of a Parent and Child Mindfulness-Based Intervention for Child Venipuncture
A Randomized Controlled Trial Testing the Effectiveness of a Mindfulness-Based Intervention for Both Parents and Children During Child Venipuncture
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
To date, there are no randomized controlled trials (RCT) involving a mindfulness intervention for pediatric acute pain. Moreover, this will be the first study to investigate a parent mindfulness intervention in the context of child acute pain. Within a randomized control trial, the objectives of this study are to test the effectiveness of a mindfulness-based intervention for children undergoing a venipuncture and their accompanying parent on (a) child ratings of pain and fear, (b) parent and child ratings of parent distress, and (c) parent perceptions of child pain and fear. Participants will complete questionnaires immediately before and after child venipuncture. This study aims to offer a novel intervention that may improve both parent and child experience during a stressful situation in which parent and child unmanaged distress has deleterious effects. The long-term objectives of this line of research are to improve extant pain management interventions for children undergoing needle-pokes or other painful procedures.
Moderator Aims: To identify possible moderators of a differential treatment outcome (parent and child responses during the needle-poke). These psychological factors include parent and child state catastrophizing, trait experiential avoidance, and trait mindfulness which will be investigated as moderators of the impact of experimental group on the primary outcomes of child self-reported pain and fear, and secondary outcome of parent self-reported distress.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Ontario
-
Guelph, Ontario, Canada, N1G 2W1
- University of Guelph
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Proficiency in English
Exclusion Criteria:
- Major developmental delays in child
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Mindfulness-Based Condition
Parents and children in the mindfulness intervention condition will be provided with a tablet and accompanying headphones, and will listen to pre-recorded audio of a mindfulness activity.
There is a parent and child version of the mindfulness intervention.
Both scripts were developed by Siegel and Bryson (2011), and include a parent and child version of a mindfulness activity targeting worries and anxiety.
Adjustments to the child script were informed by the work of Petter and colleagues (2013).
Adjustments to the parent script were informed by the work of Garland and colleagues (2015).
This activity will last 5-minutes.
|
Each script for the mindfulness-based intervention was slightly modified to fit the context of a venipuncture, and begins with instructions to take deep breaths.
Both scripts aim to cultivate present moment awareness of experiences, curiosity, nonjudgement, and acceptance of experiences as they unfold.
In particular, the scripts ask that the participant visualize their worries and feelings as a cloud in the sky, and probes for curious thoughts about these experiences.
The temporary nature of sensations is described, and the participant is asked to keep this openness and curiosity during the venipuncture.
|
|
Sham Comparator: Unfocused attention Condition
Parents and children in the unfocused attention condition will be provided with a tablet and accompanying headphones, and will listen to pre-recorded audio of an unfocused attention activity.
There is a parent and child version of this activity.
The parent version has been validated in other research with healthy adults as a control for a mindfulness intervention (Garland, Hanley, Farb, & Froeliger, 2015).
This script was condensed in time from the original reading.
The child version of the activity was developed for the current study, and was adapted from a mind-wandering script used for children aged 7-12 in past research (Spann, 2016).
It was also informed by the unfocused attention script used for parents (Garland, Hanley, Farb, & Froeliger, 2015), and work by Cahn and Polich (2009).
This activity will last 5-mintues.
|
Each script for the unfocused attention task instructs participants to allow their mind and thoughts to roam.
The aim is to encourage the participant to continue thinking and mind wandering as they typically would.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Child pain during the needle: Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
Time Frame: Within two minutes following the needle-poke.
|
Between group changes in child self-reported pain as rated on a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS).
The NRS has been used to assess pain intensity in children aged 7 and older during acutely painful procedures (Hsieh et al., 2017; Pagé, Stinson, Campbell, Isaac, & Katz, 2013; Vervoort et al., 2011).The NRS is rated on an 11-point numerical rating scale, ranging from 0 ("no pain") to 10 ("a lot of pain").
|
Within two minutes following the needle-poke.
|
|
Child fear during the needle
Time Frame: Within two minutes following the needle-poke.
|
Between group changes in child self-reported fear as rated on a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS).
The NRS has been used to assess child fear in children aged 7 and older during acutely painful procedures (Hsieh et al., 2017; Vervoort et al., 2011).
The NRS is rated on an 11-point numerical rating scale, ranging from 0 ("not scared") to 10 ("very scared").
|
Within two minutes following the needle-poke.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Child perceptions of parent distress
Time Frame: Within five minutes following the needle-poke.
|
Between group changes in child perceptions of parent fear as rated on a NRS (researcher generated).
Children will be asked to "Tell us how upset you think your parent was during the needle".
This item will be rated on an 11-point numerical rating scale, ranging from 0 ("not at all") to 10 ("extremely").
|
Within five minutes following the needle-poke.
|
|
Parent distress
Time Frame: Within five minutes following the needle-poke.
|
Between group changes in parent self-report distress as rated on a NRS.
Parents will be asked to provide ratings indicating their level of distress experienced on a NRS (researcher generated).
For the purpose of the current study, the NRS will ask parents to "Tell us how distressed you were during the needle".
The NRS is rated on an 11-point numerical rating scale, ranging from 0 ("not at all") to 10 ("extremely").
|
Within five minutes following the needle-poke.
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Parent perceptions of child pain
Time Frame: Within five minutes following the needle-poke.
|
Between group changes in parent report of child pain as rated on a NRS (Vervoort et al., 2011).
Parents will be prompted to provide ratings corresponding to how much pain they think their child experienced.
The NRS is rated on an 11-point numerical rating scale, ranging from 0 ("no pain") to 10 ("a lot of pain").
|
Within five minutes following the needle-poke.
|
|
Parent perceptions of child fear
Time Frame: Within five minutes following the needle-poke.
|
Between group changes in parent report of child fear as rated on a NRS (Vervoort et al., 2011).
Parents will be prompted to provide ratings corresponding to how much pain they think their child experienced.
The NRS is rated on an 11-point numerical rating scale, ranging from 0 ("not scared") to 10 ("very scared").
|
Within five minutes following the needle-poke.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: C. Meghan McMurtry, PhD, University of Guelph
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Page MG, Stinson J, Campbell F, Isaac L, Katz J. Identification of pain-related psychological risk factors for the development and maintenance of pediatric chronic postsurgical pain. J Pain Res. 2013;6:167-80. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S40846. Epub 2013 Mar 5.
- Hsieh LY, Chen YR, Lu MC. Efficacy of cold application on pain during chest tube removal: a randomized controlled trial: A CONSORT-compliant article. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Nov;96(46):e8642. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008642.
- Vervoort T, Goubert L, Vandenbossche H, Van Aken S, Matthys D, Crombez G. Child's and parents' catastrophizing about pain is associated with procedural fear in children: a study in children with diabetes and their mothers. Psychol Rep. 2011 Dec;109(3):879-95. doi: 10.2466/07.15.16.21.PR0.109.6.879-895.
- Spann, C. A. (2016). Mindfulness and mind-wandering: the impact of brief interventions on child affect, arousal, and cognition. The University of Texas at Arlington. Retrieved from https://uta-ir.tdl.org/uta-ir/bitstream/handle/10106/25806/SPANN-DISSERTATION-2016.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
- Cahn BR, Polich J. Meditation (Vipassana) and the P3a event-related brain potential. Int J Psychophysiol. 2009 Apr;72(1):51-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2008.03.013. Epub 2008 Sep 23.
- Garland EL, Hanley A, Farb NA, Froeliger BE. State Mindfulness During Meditation Predicts Enhanced Cognitive Reappraisal. Mindfulness (N Y). 2015 Apr 1;6(2):234-242. doi: 10.1007/s12671-013-0250-6.
- Petter M, Chambers CT, MacLaren Chorney J. The effects of mindfulness-based attention on cold pressor pain in children. Pain Res Manag. 2013 Jan-Feb;18(1):39-45. doi: 10.1155/2013/857045.
- Siegel, D. J., & Bryson, T. P. (2011). The whole-brain child : 12 revolutionary strategies to nurture your child's developing mind. Delacorte Press. Retrieved from https://books.google.ca/books/about/The_Whole_Brain_Child.html?id=APzgCL8mgHUC&printsec=frontcover&source=kp_read_button&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
- Constantin KL, Moline RL, Pillai Riddell R, Spence JR, Fiacconi CM, Lupo-Flewelling K, McMurtry CM. Parent and child self- and co-regulation during pediatric venipuncture: Exploring heart rate variability and the effects of a mindfulness intervention. Dev Psychobiol. 2022 Jul;64(5):e22277. doi: 10.1002/dev.22277.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- REB 5481
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.