Effect of Add-on Spironolactone to Losartan Versus Losartan Alone on Peritoneal Membrane Among Peritoneal Dialysis Patients (ESCAPE-PD)

August 30, 2019 updated by: Chidchanok Ruengorn, Chiang Mai University

Effect of Add-on Spironolactone to Losartan Versus Losartan Alone on Peritoneal Membrane Among Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis Patients: An Open-Label Randomized-Controlled Trial

The ESCAPE-PD (Effects of add-on SpironolaCtone to losartan versus Alone on Peritoneal mEmbrane among continuous ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis patients) study is a randomized, open-label, single center, active-controlled clinical trial. Adults end-stage kidney disease patients 18 years or older undergoing continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) will be enrolled. A total 84 CAPD will be randomly assigned to either the combination of spironolactone and losartan (experimental arm) or losartan alone (control arm). The primary outcomes are the difference in peritoneal dialysate effluent cancer antigen-125 (CA-125) and peritoneal equilibration test (PET) indices (dialysate-to-plasma creatinine ratio, 4-hour ultrafiltration volume, and the concentration of glucose present in the solution at the start of the test). Secondary outcome measures include laboratory and mechanistic outcome measures, nutrition outcomes, health-related quality of life, physical function, clinical events, and safety profiles. Results will be disseminated to suggest a strategy to prevent the peritoneal membrane function among CAPD patients through peer-reviewed publications along with scientific meetings.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is one of the methods of renal replacement therapy (RRT) that can easily perform at home. The declared "PD first" policy from the National Health Security Office causes rapidly expansion of this group of patients. In the year 2013, the current study in Thailand showed that the patients enrolled for peritoneal dialysis accumulated for more than 15,000 people. It works continuously similar to the actual function of the kidneys in normal people. In addition, PD also helps to slow the decline of remaining kidney function (residual renal function), which is very important and affect in decreasing mortality rate in this group of patients. However, PD has several limitations such as complications from the infection and high failure rate associated with a dysfunction of the peritoneal membrane during long-term treatment. Approximately 4-12 percent of patients will have ultrafiltration failure and volume overload in the first couple of years of treatment and soar to 30-50 percent in patients treated for more than six years.

The causes of peritoneal membrane deterioration are exposure to incompatible dialysis solution with hyperosmolar glucose content, acidic pH, reactions to PD catheter material, uremia and peritonitis. The alterations of structural and functional of the peritoneal membrane after exposed to these several insults are epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), and increase in peritoneal solute transport, which consequently leading to peritoneal dialysis failure. It has been already demonstrated that the local renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) plays a key role in this regulation by promoting the activation of neoangiogenesis and fibrotic pathways.

According to the pathophysiologic changes of the peritoneal membrane, Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors (ACEIs) and Angiotensin Receptor Blockers (ARBs) are adapted to be use in respect of membrane preserving agents. Many studies, both in human and animal models, demonstrate the protective effect against peritoneal membrane deterioration by inhibiting the formation of transforming growth factor beta1 (TGF-β1), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and decreasing progression rate of small to high transport membrane type. In fact, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) seem to have higher efficacy than ACEIs/ARBs in some experimental models. The possible mechanism is the effects of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists that not only inhibit the formation of TGF- β1 and VEGF, but also suppress intracellular Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) generation, activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) 1/2, and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), the substrates responsible for aldosterone induces alterations in cell phenotype. A prospective cohort study of 23 CAPD patients was conducted and evaluated the effect of spironolactone on peritoneal membrane. The result showed the possible benefit of spironolactone in slowing the decline of peritoneal function, suppressing the elevation of profibrotic markers, and increasing mesothelial cell mass.

As a result of the clinical practice, most of CAPD patients tend to receive ACEIs/ARBs as prescribe by the clinicians, in order to control blood pressure, raise serum potassium level, and others compelling indications. Thus, the concept of add-on MRAs to ACEIs/ARBs, desiring the synergistic effects of these 2 drugs group, for membrane preservation is challenge. Notwithstanding the fact that current evidence about the combination effects of ACEIs/ARBs with MRAs is limited in term of quality of the study, sample size, inadequate follow-up period, and poor sensitive parameter in assessing the structural and functional changes of the peritoneal membrane. Thereby, this study aims to evaluate the effect of add-on spironolactone to losartan versus losartan alone on membrane preservation in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

84

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Chiang Mai, Thailand, 50200
        • Pharmacoepidemiology and Statistics Research Center, Faculty of Pharmacy, Chiang Mai University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years or older (both male and female patients)
  • Incidence or prevalent end-stage kidney disease patients undergoing CAPD
  • Had standard dialysis prescription for at least 30 days before screening
  • History of hypertension
  • Stable clinical condition without any inflammation at least 4 weeks prior to enrolment
  • Had an ability to understand and willingness to sign an informed consent statement

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Serum potassium concentration of ≥ 5.5 milliequivalent /liter
  • History of severe or active cardiovascular and/or cerebrovascular disease
  • History of renal artery stenosis
  • Uncontrolled hypertension
  • Contraindication to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor blockers or mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists
  • Pregnancy
  • Recent PD-related peritonitis or exit-site and tunnel infection (within 2 months of screening)
  • Had planned to have kidney transplantation or transfer to other PD centers with 6 months
  • Prognosis for survival less than 12 months
  • Any conditions (both mental or physical) that would interfere with the participant's ability to comply with the study protocol
  • Any disease of the abdominal wall, such as injury or surgery, burns, hernia, dermatitis, inflammatory bowel diseases (Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis or diverticulitis) that in the opinion of the Investigator would preclude the patient from being able to have PD
  • Any intra-abdominal tumors or intestinal obstruction
  • Current or recent (within 30 days) exposure to others investigational medicinal products

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Combination of spironolactone and losartan
Spironolactone Starting dose: 25 mg/day Target dose: 100 mg/day Titration: every 1-2 weeks, based on BP (keep< 140/90 mmHg, but avoid hypotension <90/60 mmHg), and serum potassium level (<5.5 milliequivalent /liter)
Losartan Starting dose: 50 mg/day Target dose: 100 mg/day Titration: every 1-2 weeks, based on BP (keep< 140/90 mmHg, but avoid hypotension <90/60 mmHg), and serum potassium level (<5.5 milliequivalent /liter)
Active Comparator: Losartan Alone
Losartan Starting dose: 50 mg/day Target dose: 100 mg/day Titration: every 1-2 weeks, based on BP (keep< 140/90 mmHg, but avoid hypotension <90/60 mmHg), and serum potassium level (<5.5 milliequivalent /liter)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Peritoneal dialysate effluent CA-125
Time Frame: 6 months
Using a commercial microparticle enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
6 months
PET indices
Time Frame: 6 months
PET indices including dialysate-to-plasma creatinine ratio [D/P Cr], 4-hour ultrafiltration (UF) volume, and the concentration of glucose present in the solution at the start of the test [D/D0]) measured using a modified PET method (performed using 2,000 mL of 2.5% glucose solution).
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in waist circumference
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Changes in dialysate adequacy by Weekly kt/V
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Changes in dialysate adequacy by weekly creatinine clearance
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Changes in serum albumin concentration
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Changes in serum potassium concentration
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Changes in body mass index (BMI)
Time Frame: 6 months
Weight and height will be combined to report BMI in kg/m^2
6 months
Changes in Nutritional status
Time Frame: 6 months
Using Subjective Global Assessment (SGA)
6 months
Changes in Malnutrition-Inflammation Score (MIS)
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Changes in participant quality of life score
Time Frame: 6 months
Using Kidney Disease Quality of Life-36 (KDQOL-36 Version 1.3)
6 months
Changes in health utility
Time Frame: 6 months
Using EuroQOL-5 dimension 5-level (EQ-5D-5L)
6 months
Changes in disease-specific Thai quality of life score
Time Frame: 6 months
Using the 9-Thai Health status AssessmentInstrument (9-THAI) questionnaire
6 months
Changes in participant well-being score
Time Frame: 6 months
Using the World Health Organization-Five (WHO-5) well-being index
6 months
Number of participants with disability
Time Frame: 6 months
Using the Barthel activities daily life index
6 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in blood pressure
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Incidence of PD technique failure
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Incidence of PD-related infections
Time Frame: 6 months
Peritonitis or exit-site and tunnel infection
6 months
Number of participants with investigational medicinal products-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v4.0
Time Frame: 6 months
Safety of investigational medicinal products related to potential harm (e.g. death, hospitalization, and emergency visit)
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

October 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 20, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 15, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

May 17, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 4, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 30, 2019

Last Verified

August 1, 2019

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe