Helping Ease Anxiety and Depression Following Stroke (HEADS:UP)

September 8, 2020 updated by: Glasgow Caledonian University

HEADS: UP (Helping Ease Anxiety and Depression Following Stroke) Psychological Self-management Intervention: Non-randomised Pilot Study

The aim of this mixed methods research is to conduct feasibility pilot testing of an existing mindfulness intervention called HEADS: UP. The intervention is designed to help people affected by stroke self-manage symptoms of anxiety and depression.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Mindfulness-based interventions are thought to help people affected by stroke (Lawrence et al., 2013). Helping Ease Anxiety and Depression (HEADS: UP) is an adapted mindfulness-based intervention for people affected by stroke (Lawrence, 2019). This study aligns with the feasibility/piloting stage of the Medical Research Council framework (Craig et al., 2008) and will optimise intervention delivery and study processes, ensuring all elements are working together, ready for testing at a later stage.

The aim of this mixed methods research is to conduct feasibility pilot testing of HEADS: UP to help people affected by stroke self-manage symptoms of anxiety and depression prior to Phase III testing in future work.

This stage is a non-randomised pilot study based in Glasgow, United Kingdom. The purpose of the pilot is to assess feasibility and acceptability of delivering HEADS: UP, and recruitment and questionnaire data collection processes; identify any additional HEADS: UP adaptions.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

18

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Glasgow (City Of)
      • Glasgow, Glasgow (City Of), United Kingdom, G4 0BA
        • Glasgow Caledonian University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Have had ≥1 stroke 3-60 months previously (reflects incidence of anxiety/depression)
  • Interested in learning skills to help them cope with self-reported anxiety and/or depression
  • Able to speak and understand conversational English
  • Able to identify a family member/peer who would: like to take part, can speak and understand conversational English; not participating in another trial.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior MBSR attendance in the last three years (as this may confound results)
  • Current participant in another trial
  • Cannot follow a 2-stage command
  • ≥28 on Behavioural Assessment of Dysexecutive Syndrome (BADS) scale; assesses the cognitive skills required to engage with group-based interventions (goo.gl/uumeFw)
  • Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS); screens for anxiety and depression; used extensively in Primary Care research (goo.gl/TtdDDW). A score of 8-10 suggests mood disorder; ≥11 indicates 'probable presence'. A total cut-off score of 11 achieves optimal balance between sensitivity and specificity, and will be used for family/peer participants who have not had a stroke. A lower cut-off score is recommended for stroke survivors i.e. 4 on each sub-scale.

NOTE: A current prescription for anxiolytics or antidepressants is not an exclusion criterion. If screening identifies a potential participant who requires GP referral, that individual may subsequently be prescribed medication; this is a feature of the pilot work. In a future trial, where participants are randomised to two arms and there is equal probability of people being on medication in each arm, it will not be an issue.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: HEADS: UP
HEADS: UP is group-based mindfulness intervention based on the original mindfulness based stress reduction course, but adapted for people affected by stroke.

HEADS: UP comprises 9 x 2.5 hour mindfulness teaching sessions and a silent retreat in week 7. Course materials include accessible information packs and resources to complement class-based sessions.

The first week of the 9-week course is an introductory class. The purpose of the introductory class is to give participants the opportunity to meet the trainers and to decide if they want to learn more about mindfulness. The introductory session also allows participants to meet other people on the course and to share their (stroke) stories.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Stroke Specific Quality of Life Scale (SS-QOL): change is being assessed
Time Frame: Weeks 0, 9, 21
The Stroke Specific Quality of Life Scale (SS-QOL) is an outcome measure intended to assess of health-related quality of life for people affected by stroke. It is a self-report scale containing 49 items in 12 domains. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale and the questionnaire is usually completed in 10-15 minutes.
Weeks 0, 9, 21
Stroke Impact Scale (SIS): change is being assessed
Time Frame: Weeks 0, 9, 21
The Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) is a self-report, health status measure for people affected by stroke. It was designed to assess strength, hand function, activities of daily living, mobility, communication, emotion, memory and thinking, and participation. The SIS can be used both in clinical and research settings. It contains 59 items and assesses 8 domains. Each item is rated using a 5-point Likert scale. A final single-item question assesses the individual's perception of recovery from stroke, measured using a visual analogue scale, where 0 = no recovery & 100 = full recovery. The scale is normally completed in 15-20 minutes.
Weeks 0, 9, 21

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS): change is being assessed
Time Frame: Weeks 0, 9, 21

The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) is a self-administered measure of depression and anxiety. The HADS is not a diagnostic tool, but can screen for anxiety and depression. The HADS has 14 items in total and asks about mood in the past week. Seven items assess depression and seven items assess anxiety. The HADS can be administered repeatedly without impacting on validity. Each item is rated on a 4-point scale and provide a score 0-21. A higher score indicates higher distress.

Usually completed in 2-5 minutes

Weeks 0, 9, 21
Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS): change is being assessed
Time Frame: Weeks 0, 9, 21
The DASS is a set of three self-report scales designed to measure depression, anxiety and stress. Each of the three DASS scales contains 14 items, divided into subscales of 2-5 items with similar content. The Depression scale assesses dysphoria, hopelessness, devaluation of life, self-deprecation, lack of interest/involvement, anhedonia, and inertia. The Anxiety scale assesses autonomic arousal, skeletal muscle effects, situational anxiety, and subjective experience of anxious affect. The Stress scale is sensitive to levels of chronic non-specific arousal. It assesses difficulty relaxing, nervous arousal, and being easily upset/agitated, irritable/over-reactive and impatient. Subjects are asked to use 4-point severity/frequency scales to rate the extent to which they have experienced each state over the past week. Scores for Depression, Anxiety and Stress are calculated by summing the scores for the relevant items.
Weeks 0, 9, 21
Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II): change is being assessed
Time Frame: Weeks 0, 9, 21

The Beck Depression Inventory 11 (BDI-II) is a 21 items self-report scale to assess the intensity of depression. Each item is a list of four statements arranged in increasing severity about a symptom of depression. Score range between 0-63 with higher score indicating greater severity.

Normally completed in 5-10 minutes.

Weeks 0, 9, 21
Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI): change is being assessed
Time Frame: Weeks 0, 9 21
The Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) is a self-report 21-item scale for measuring anxiety. The questions ask about symptoms of anxiety the subject has had during the past week. Each question is scored between 0 (mild) and 3 (severe) and a total score will vary between 0-63. Higher scores indicate more severe anxiety symptoms.
Weeks 0, 9 21
EQ-5D 5L: change is being assessed
Time Frame: Weeks 0, 9, 21
The 5-level EQ-5D version (EQ-5D-5L) comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems. The patient is asked to indicate his/her health state by ticking the box next to the most appropriate statement in each of the five dimensions. This decision results in a 1-digit number that expresses the level selected for that dimension. The digits for the five dimensions can be combined into a 5-digit number that describes the patient's health state.
Weeks 0, 9, 21

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Carer Strain Index (CSI): change is being assessed
Time Frame: Weeks 0, 9, 21
The Carer Strain Index (CSI) is a 13-item self-report questionnaire. The tool covers employment, financial, physical, social and time. Positive responses to 7 or more items on the index indicate a greater level of strain. This instrument can be used to assess individuals of any age who have assumed the role of carer for an older adult.
Weeks 0, 9, 21
Focus Groups (FG): change is being assessed
Time Frame: Weeks 9, 21
Focus Groups (FGs) will be used to collect qualitative data. Focus groups will explore the feasibility, acceptability, meaningfulness, and effectiveness of the intervention.
Weeks 9, 21

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 22, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 8, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 20, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

May 21, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 9, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 8, 2020

Last Verified

September 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depression

Clinical Trials on HEADS: UP

3
Subscribe