Integrated Depression Care (IDECA)

June 5, 2023 updated by: University Ghent

Integrated Depression Care Project

The Integrated DEpression CAre (IDECA) Programme is a multi-faceted intervention strategy aiming to improve guideline adherence and shared care practices for depression management in both providers and patients, as measured through a set of process and clinical outcome indicators (primary outcome measure).

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The following deliverables apply:

  1. Development and implementation of a shared care protocol for depression management involving primary, secondary and tertiary care levels;
  2. Training module for physicians and other care providers in population health management for patients with depression;
  3. Training module for case managers/integration of a case management function into existing depression service offerings;
  4. A patient education module for depression self-management;
  5. A financing model for integrated depression care.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

150

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • persons between 18-65
  • presenting to the general practitioner's office
  • with depressive symtomatology

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe depression warranting direct referral to specialized services

Inclusion criteria are kept broad on purpose as it's one of the research questions to define for which patients the intervention (namely the case management) is appropriate.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Integrated care arm
Case management in primary care setting (integration at general practitioners' practices), Depression and population management education for general practitioners, shared care guidance protocol including a medication path (drug classes, no specific drugs specified, based on available depression guidelines in Belgium).

The intervention will be modelled based on the most frequently reported patient, family physician and specialist barriers in depression management. In this project, multiple interventions aiming to tackle these barriers will be set up, with the WHO Framework on Integrated People-Centred Health Services (IPCHS) serving as conceptual backbone to the study (Table 1). The IPCHS distinguishes five interdependent strategies supporting a shift in healthcare delivery, management and funding towards universal health coverage. These strategies are:

  1. empowering and engaging people and communities;
  2. strengthening governance and accountability;
  3. reorienting the model of care;
  4. coordinating services within and across sectors;
  5. creating an enabling environment.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Intervention integration
Time Frame: 14 months
Nomad questionnaire (4 monthly), followed by focus groups following Balint method, and individual interviews.
14 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Depression
Time Frame: 12 months
PHQ-9 (Patient Health Questionnaire. DSM-5 depression), A PHQ-9 score total of 0-4 points equals "normal" or minimal depression. Scoring between 5-9 points indicates mild depression, 10-14 points indicates moderate depression, 15-19 points indicates moderately severe depression, and 20 or more points indicates severe depression
12 months
Depression and anxiety
Time Frame: 12 months

OQ-45-2 (Outcome Questionnaire. Transdiagnostical instrument focused on anxiety and depression) Total Score

  • Total scores (≥ 64) reflect increased distress

    • High is anything above 105
    • Moderately High is between 83 and 105
    • Moderate is between 64 and 82
    • Low is anything below 64 Symptom Distress (SD)
  • Scores (≥ 37) indicate subjective discomfort Interpersonal Relations (IR)
  • Scores (≥ 16) reflect problems in interpersonal relations. Social Role (SR)
  • Scores (≥ 13) indicate dissatisfaction, conflict, distress, and inadequacy in performance of tasks related to employment, school, family roles and leisure life.
12 months
Medication adherence and self-efficacy
Time Frame: 12 months

MARS-5 (Medication adherence report score) Each item was rated on a 5-point Likert scale, and the range of the MARS-5 total score is between 5 and 25. A higher score on the MARS-5 represents better medication adherence. <21 suboptimal adherence.

MUSE (Medication Understanding and Use Self-Efficacy Scale). Score 8-32. Higher scores are better.

12 months
Resource use
Time Frame: 12 months
iMCQ (The iMTA Medical Consumption Questionnaire) to capture depression-related resource use
12 months
Health-related Quality of Life
Time Frame: 12 months
EQ5D5L (EuroQol 5 Dimensions 5 levels). Score 0 equals death and 1 perfect health.
12 months
Health literacy
Time Frame: 12 months
HLS-EU-Q16. Considering the HLS-EUQ16 score, three levels of health literacy were defined: - inadequate HL (0-8) - problematic HL (9-12) - adequate HL (13-16)
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Liesbeth Borgermans, PhD, University Ghent
  • Study Chair: Lieven Annemans, PhD, University Ghent

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 25, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 19, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 27, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

March 28, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 7, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 5, 2023

Last Verified

June 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • NOPRODDEP4002

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

None, except anonymized data for peer review.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depression Moderate

Clinical Trials on Integrated care

3
Subscribe