Personal Lifestyle Engine (PLX) - Personal Lifestyle Medicine Center (PLMC)

October 26, 2023 updated by: Metagenics, Inc.

Personal Lifestyle Engine (PLX) is an Employee Wellness Platform and App Used at the Personal Lifestyle Medicine Center (PLMC). This Study Examines Correlations Between Lifestyle Factors, Genomic Data, Physical Exam Finding and Biomarkers

It has been suggested that the best medicine should include four principles (4P) - Medicine should be personalized, predictive, preventative and participatory. Technology has provided the tools to collect data in ways not previously possible. Individuals can now collect information on their genome (including their genetic predisposition to tolerate medications and to respond to healthy lifestyle programs) that will modify their lifestyle and therapeutic choices. Beyond spot checks of vital signs and weight, individuals can now collect information on body composition, continuous monitoring of heart rate, blood pressure, and even blood sugar. Data on food consumption at a caloric, macronutrient and even micronutrient level can be collected. Standard medical histories and detailed physical examination findings and laboratory biomarkers can be correlated with this data.

Collections of individual patient data will need to be managed through computer programs and smart phone applications that provide direct feedback about the influence of lifestyle on health, wellness and biomarkers. To this end, Metagenics is designing and is launching a smart phone application, Personal Lifestyle Engine (PLX), for individual use by patients and their healthcare providers. The statistical analysis of these data is the primary objective of this study.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Technology has led to a significant revisioning and modification of the models of medicine in practice today. It has been suggested that the best medicine should include four principles - Medicine should be personalized, predictive, preventative and participatory. This 4P medicine will thus be patient centered with a focus on the person who has the disease and not the disease the person has. It will be predictive as it identifies the preclinical trend/decline towards illness sooner than onset of symptoms that herald the loss of function and health. It will be preventative as the information gathered should offer opportunities to modify these trajectories towards illness and finally it will be participatory as individuals will be intimately involved in the gathering of data to identify trends and in the application of lifestyle measures to improve the quality of their life.

Technology has provided the tools to collect data in ways not previously possible. Individuals can now collect information on their genome (including their genetic predisposition to tolerate medications and to respond to healthy lifestyle programs) that will modify their lifestyle and therapeutic choices. Beyond spot checks of vital signs and weight, individuals can now collect information on body composition, continuous monitoring of heart rate, blood pressure, and even blood sugar. Data on food consumption at a caloric, macronutrient and even micronutrient level can be collected. Standard medical histories and detailed physical examination findings and laboratory biomarkers can be correlated with this data.

As has been noted in the Nathan Price et al. article, "A wellness study of 108 individuals using personal, dense, dynamic data clouds" (PMID: 28714965), a significant challenge to the effective use of these complex sets of individual patient data is how to define the boundaries between disease, average health and optimal wellbeing. To meet this challenge, compiling and analyzing collections of de-identified, detailed patient histories, questionnaires regarding symptoms and general condition, and associated objective findings (genomic data, vital signs, and physical exam and laboratory biomarkers) will theoretically identify these boundaries and will facilitate the deliverance of 4P Medicine. Comprehensive data collections on each subject evaluated in aggregate provides a diversity of uniqueness markers that can be statistically probed to identify patterns that predict wellbeing and perhaps individual response to lifestyle interventions.

An additional challenge for both the patient and their health care provider in 2018 and beyond is how to manage this data in an effective manner. Collections of individual patient data will need to be managed through computer programs and smart phone applications that provide direct feedback about the influence of lifestyle on health, wellness and biomarkers. To this end, Metagenics is designing and is launching a smart phone application, PLX, for individual use by patients and their healthcare providers. After and while a statistical analysis of this data set has been/is being completed, the data set will also be used in an initial beta test of the PLX operating system. The PLX application will not be used to conduct the statistical analysis which is the primary objective of this study."

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

400

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Washington
      • Gig Harbor, Washington, United States, 98332
        • Personalized Lifestyle Medicine Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Subjects will be recruited first from Metagenics employees but expand to family members of employees and from the general population. It is expected that subjects will be recruited from the private practices of both Study Investigators and associated clinical staff.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or Female
  • Ages 18-80, inclusive
  • Willing to give written informed consent to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • A serious, unstable illness including cardiac, hepatic, renal, gastrointestinal, respiratory, endocrinologic, neurologic, immunologic, or hematologic disease.
  • Known infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), tuberculosis (TB), or hepatitis B or C.
  • Inability to comply with study and/or follow-up visits.
  • Any concurrent condition (including clinically significant abnormalities in medical history, physical examination or laboratory evaluations) which, in the opinion of the Principle Investigator (PI), would preclude safe participation in this study or interfere with compliance.
  • Any sound medical, psychiatric and/or social reason which, in the opinion of the PI, would preclude safe participation in this study or interfere with compliance.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Cross-Sectional

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Employee population
Subject comprised of employees of Metagenics but later will be expanded to those recruited from practitioner practices

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Height
Time Frame: Baseline
measured in meter (m)
Baseline
Weight
Time Frame: Baseline
measured in kilogram (kg)
Baseline
Body Mass index (BMI)
Time Frame: Baseline
BMI is measured in (weight in kilogram (kg)/ height in meter (m)^2) outcome in double digits.
Baseline
Waist Circumference (WC)
Time Frame: Baseline
measured in centimeters (cm)
Baseline
Hip Circumference (HC)
Time Frame: Baseline
measured in cm
Baseline
Waist-to-Hip Ratio (WHR)
Time Frame: Baseline
WHR is numerical (0.00) and is and indicator for major health risk.
Baseline
Glucose
Time Frame: Baseline
Fasting glucose levels measured in blood in milligram/deciLiter (mg/dL)
Baseline
Total Cholesterol
Time Frame: Baseline
Fasting total cholesterol level is measured in serum in mg/dL
Baseline
Anti-Nuclear Antibodies (ANA)
Time Frame: Baseline
ANA is measured as a titer by serum dilution detects autoimmune disease.
Baseline
25-hydroxy (OH) Vitamin D3
Time Frame: Baseline
25-OH vitamin D3 is measured in blood in nanogram/milliLiter (ng/mL) and detects deficiencies.
Baseline
High sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (Hs-CRP)
Time Frame: Baseline
Hs-CRP is measured in blood in mg/L detects inflammation.
Baseline
Homocysteine
Time Frame: Baseline
Homocysteine is measured in serum in micromol/Liter (µmol/L)
Baseline
Omega-3 Fatty Acids
Time Frame: Baseline
Omega-3 fatty acids: Eicosapentaenoic (EPA), Docosahexaenoic (DHA), and Docosapentaenoic (DPA) levels are measured in % weight.
Baseline
Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)
Time Frame: Baseline
BDI is a 21-question multiple-choice self-report inventory, one of the most widely used psychometric tests for measuring the severity of depression. Rating system: 1-10: These ups and downs are considered normal; 11-16: Mild mood disturbance; 17-20: Borderline clinical depression; 21-30: Severe depression; over 40: Extreme depression
Baseline
Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI)
Time Frame: Baseline

BAI is a multiple-choice self-report inventory that is used for measuring the severity of anxiety in children and adults.The BAI contains 21 questions, each answer being scored on a scale value of 0 (not at all) to 3 (severely). Higher total scores indicate more severe anxiety symptoms. The standardized cutoffs[4] are:

0-7: minimal anxiety 8-15: mild anxiety 16-25: moderate anxiety 26-63: severe anxiety

Baseline
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Sleep Disturbance Test
Time Frame: Baseline
PROMIS Sleep Disturbance Test is a self-scored test to identify sleep disturbance. Each item on the measure is rated on a 5-point scale (1=never; 2=rarely; 3=sometimes; 4=often; and 5=always) with a range in score from 8 to 40 with higher scores indicating greater severity of sleep disturbance. The T-scores are interpreted as follows: Less than 55 = None to slight 55.0-59.9 = Mild 60.0-69.9 = Moderate 70 and over = Severe
Baseline
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Anxiety Test
Time Frame: Baseline
PROMIS Anxiety test is a 7-item questionnaire that assesses the pure domain of anxiety in individuals age 18 and older. Each item on the measure is rated on a 5-point scale (1=never; 2=rarely; 3=sometimes; 4=often; and 5=always) with a range in score from 7 to 35 with higher scores indicating greater severity of anxiety. The T-scores are interpreted as follows: Less than 55 = None to slight 55.0-59.9 = Mild 60.0-69.9 = Moderate 70 and over = Severe
Baseline
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Depression Short Form (SF)
Time Frame: Baseline
PROMIS Depression SF is an 8-item questionnaire that assesses the pure domain of depression in individuals age 18 and older. Each item on the measure is rated on a 5-point scale (1=never; 2=rarely; 3=sometimes; 4=often; and 5=always) with a range in score from 8 to 40 with higher scores indicating greater severity of depression.The T-scores are interpreted as follows: Less than 55 = None to slight 55.0-59.9 = Mild 60.0-69.9 = Moderate 70 and over = Severe
Baseline
Genomics
Time Frame: Baseline
DNA polymorphism measured using 23&Me
Baseline
Stool
Time Frame: Baseline
Stool analysis measured by a stool analysis kit from American Gut
Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Joseph Lamb, MD, Personalized Lifestyle Medicine Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 15, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 2, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

July 5, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 30, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 26, 2023

Last Verified

October 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Autoimmune Diseases

3
Subscribe