Tracking Our Lives Study

November 4, 2019 updated by: Samantha Hahn, University of Michigan

Impact of Using Self-monitoring Smartphone Applications on College Students' Well-being

College women are at risk for eating disorders, which have profound health impacts. Cross-sectional studies have shown that the use of dietary self-monitoring is associated with eating disorder risk among college students. However, causality cannot be established with cross-sectional studies.

This study utilizes a randomized controlled trial design to examine how the use of a popular dietary self-monitoring smartphone application impacts college females' well-being, including eating disorder risk. We hypothesize those who are randomized to dietary self-monitoring will have a greater increase in eating disorder risk compared to the control group.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

200

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48109
        • University of Michigan

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • University of Michigan Ann Arbor undergraduate student
  • Daily access to a smartphone
  • Female gender
  • At least 18 years of age
  • Fluent in English

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Self-reported history of any medical condition that impacts the types or amount of food eaten
  • Self-reported recent use of dietary self-monitoring
  • Self-reported history of an active or past eating disorder
  • Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire Short Form (EDE-QS) score ≥ 2, indicating high eating disorder risk

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention
Participants are instructed to use a popular dietary self-monitoring application on their smartphone for one month.
Participants use a popular smartphone application to track their food and drink intake for one month.
No Intervention: Control
Participants are not asked to use the smartphone application.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Eating Disorder Risk
Time Frame: 30 days
Eating disorder risk will be measured on a survey via the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire Short Form (EDE-QS). The EDE-QS is a validated 12 question scale. Each question has a score range 0-3, and the average of all scores is the overall score. A higher score indicates higher risk.
30 days
Eating Disorder Risk
Time Frame: 30 days
Measured via survey using the validated SCOFF questionnaire which consists of five questions. Each question is a yes/no and a yes receives one point with a total score ranging from 0-5. Higher scores indicate higher risk. Modified to ask about pounds instead of stone as a measure of weight.
30 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Weight-Related Self-Monitoring
Time Frame: 30 days
Measured via survey that includes single item measures asking about physical activity self-monitoring and self-weighing frequency.
30 days
Body Image
Time Frame: 30 days
Assessed via survey using the validated 6 question Body Image States Scale (BISS). Scores are the mean of the six items, three of which are reverse coded. Higher scores mean better body image states.
30 days
Weight Stigma
Time Frame: 30 days
Measured via survey using five single item questions.
30 days
Dietary Intake
Time Frame: 30 days
Single item survey questions adapted from the Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System
30 days
Physical Activity
Time Frame: 30 days
Single item survey questions adapted from the Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System and an open ended question for amount of time physically active.
30 days
Weight perception
Time Frame: 30 days
Assessed using two questions on a survey pertaining to BMI category and weight.
30 days
Body changing intentions
Time Frame: 30 days
Assessed using single item question on a survey asking how, if at all, participants wanted to change their body.
30 days
Social Media Use
Time Frame: 30 days
Use of common social media sites assessed using five single item measures on a survey.
30 days
Weight
Time Frame: 30 days
Blind weights taken on research grade laboratory scale.
30 days
Subjective Quality of Life
Time Frame: 30 days
Assessed using the Brunnsviken Brief Quality of Life Scale (BBQ) on a survey. The BBQ has 12 questions, each ranging from 0-4. Higher scores indicate higher subjective quality of life.
30 days
Anxiety
Time Frame: 30 days
State anxiety as measured via survey using the short-form of the state scale of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. The scale consists of 6 questions with a range of scores 1-4 for each question. Three positive questions are reverse coded and scores are added together with higher scores indicating higher state anxiety.
30 days
Depression Symptoms
Time Frame: 30 days
Measured via survey using the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale Revised (CESD-R-10). The CESD-R-10 is a 10 item scale with each question having the possibility of a score 0-3. Two questions are reverse coded, then scores from each question are added to give an overall score. Higher scores indicate more depressive symptoms.
30 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 15, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 7, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 8, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

August 9, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 5, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 4, 2019

Last Verified

November 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HUM00161687

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Health Behavior

Clinical Trials on Dietary self-monitoring

Subscribe