Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Inarigivir in Non-cirrhotic Treatment Naive Subjects Infected With Hepatitis B Virus

July 20, 2020 updated by: F-star Therapeutics, Inc.

A Phase 2, Exploratory Study Evaluating the Safety and Antiviral Efficacy of Inarigivir Soproxil in Non-cirrhotic Treatment-Naive Subjects Infected With Chronic Hepatitis B Virus

An open-label, Phase 2, exploratory study to examine the safety and efficacy of inarigivir in non-cirrhotic, hepatitis B treatment-naive subjects with chronic HBV infection.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

5

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Hong Kong Island
      • Hong Kong, Hong Kong Island, Hong Kong
        • Queen Mary Hospital
    • New Territories
      • Sha Tin, New Territories, Hong Kong
        • Prince of Wales Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. HBV-infected male and female subjects aged 18 to 70 years, inclusive
  2. Ultrasound, computed tomography (CT) scan, or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) within 6 months of enrollment date with no evidence of cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)
  3. Must be willing and able to comply with all study requirements
  4. Chronic HBV as defined by documented HBsAg or HBV DNA positive for 6 months or more
  5. Not on any antiviral medications for at least 6 months. If a subject is hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative, they will be eligible if they have not received antiviral medications for at least 3 months. Antiviral medications include lamivudine, telbivudine, adefovir, tenofovir, entecavir, IFN therapies of any type, and all other medications with potential antiviral activity.
  6. HBV DNA >2000 IU/mL for HBeAg-negative subjects and >20,000 IU/mL for HBeAg-positive subjects at Screening
  7. ALT <5× ULN and ≤200 U/L
  8. Negative urine or serum pregnancy test (for women of childbearing potential) documented within the 24-hour period prior to the first dose of IP. If the urine pregnancy test is positive, a follow-up serum test is required for confirmation
  9. Women of childbearing potential must agree to use a highly effective method of contraception throughout the study and for 3 months after discontinuing study treatment. Men with female partners who are of childbearing potential must agree that they or their partners will use a highly effective method of contraception throughout the study and for 3 months after discontinuing study treatment. Male subjects must not donate sperm throughout the study and for 3 months after discontinuing study treatment.

    • Women of childbearing potential are sexually mature women who have not undergone bilateral tubal ligation, bilateral oophorectomy, or hysterectomy; or who have not been postmenopausal (ie, who have not menstruated at all) for at least 1 year.
    • Highly effective methods of contraception are hormonal contraceptives (oral, injectable, patch, intrauterine devices), male partner sterilization, or total abstinence from heterosexual intercourse, when this is the preferred and usual lifestyle of the subject. Note: The double-barrier method (eg, synthetic condoms, diaphragm, or cervical cap with spermicidal foam, cream, or gel), periodic abstinence (such as calendar, symptothermal, post-ovulation), withdrawal (coitus interruptus), lactational amenorrhea method, and spermicide only are not acceptable as highly effective methods of contraception.
  10. Must have the ability to understand and sign a written informed consent form (ICF); consent must be obtained prior to initiation of study procedures

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Any prior liver biopsy evidence of metavir F3 or F4 disease
  2. Any history of decompensation of liver disease including history of ascites, encephalopathy, or varices
  3. Evidence of advanced fibrosis as defined by Fibroscan at the Screening Visit of ≥8 kPa. If Fibroscan is not available, subjects with both a Fibrotest ≥0.65 and aspartate transaminase (AST):platelet ratio index (APRI) ≥1.0 are excluded (subjects will not be excluded if only 1 of the Fibrotest or APRI results is higher than allowed)
  4. Laboratory parameters not within defined thresholds:

    1. White blood cells <4000 cells/μL (<4.0×109/L)
    2. Hemoglobin <11 g/dL (<110 g/L) for females, <13 g/dL (<130 g/L) for males
    3. Platelets <130,000 per μL (<150×109/L)
    4. Albumin <3.5 g/dL (<35 g/L)
    5. International normalized ratio (INR) >1.5
    6. Total bilirubin >1.2 mg/dL (>20.52 μmol/L) or alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) >50 ng/mL (>180.25 nmol/L). Subjects with an elevated indirect bilirubin and known Gilbert's disease can be included if direct bilirubin is within normal limits. Subjects with an AFP >50 ng/mL but <500 ng/mL can be included if CT scan or MRI performed within 3 months shows no evidence of HCC
    7. Creatinine >1.2 mg/dL (>106.08 μmol/L) and creatinine clearance <50 mL/min (<0.83 L/s/m2)
  5. Co-infection with hepatitis C virus (HCV), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), or hepatitis D virus
  6. Evidence or history of HCC
  7. Malignancy within 5 years prior to Screening, with the exception of specific cancers that are cured by surgical resection (basal cell skin cancer, etc). Subjects under evaluation for possible malignancy are not eligible
  8. Significant cardiovascular, pulmonary, or neurological disease
  9. Received solid organ or bone marrow transplant
  10. Received within 3 months of Screening or expected to receive prolonged therapy with immunomodulators (eg, corticosteroids) or biologics (eg, monoclonal antibody, IFN)
  11. Subjects currently taking medication(s) that are transported through organic anion transporting polypeptide 1 (OATP1) including, but not limited to, atazanavir, rifampin, cyclosporine, eltrombopag, gemfibrozil, lopinavir/ritonavir, and saquinavir
  12. Use of another investigational agent within 3 months of Screening
  13. Current alcohol or substance abuse judged by the Investigator to potentially interfere with compliance
  14. Females who are pregnant or may wish to become pregnant during the study
  15. If the Investigator believes the prospective subject will not be able to comply with the requirements of the protocol and complete the study
  16. Any medical condition that, in the opinion of the Investigator, could interfere with evaluation of the study objectives or safety of the subjects

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Arm 1 - Inarigivir Soproxil Daily
Inarigivir Soproxil Alone 400 mg Inarigivir daily for 12 weeks followed by 400 mg daily in combination with TAF 25 mg daily for 12 weeks
Inarigivir soproxil 400 mg tablets
Tenofovir alafenamide fumarate 25 mg tablet
Other Names:
  • VEMLIDY
EXPERIMENTAL: Arm 2 - Inarigivir Soproxil 3 Times Weekly
400 mg Inarigivir 3 times weekly for 12 weeks followed by 400 mg 3 times weekly in combination with TAF 25 mg daily for 12 weeks
Inarigivir soproxil 400 mg tablets
Tenofovir alafenamide fumarate 25 mg tablet
Other Names:
  • VEMLIDY
EXPERIMENTAL: Arm 3 - Inarigivir Soproxil and TAF Daily
400 mg Inarigivir daily in combination with TAF 25 mg daily for 24 weeks
Inarigivir soproxil 400 mg tablets
Tenofovir alafenamide fumarate 25 mg tablet
Other Names:
  • VEMLIDY

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of subjects reporting an adverse event, clinically significant adverse event, or laboratory abnormality
Time Frame: 24 to 52 weeks
Proportion of subjects reporting an adverse event or experiencing a clinically significant adverse event or laboratory abnormality from start of treatment to end of inarigivir treatment and 30 days after stopping inarigivir
24 to 52 weeks
Percentage of subjects with a ≥1 log10 reduction in HBV DNA, a ≥1 log10 reduction in HBV RNA, and a ≥0.3 log10 reduction in quantitative HBsAg
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 12
Percentage of subjects with a ≥1 log10 reduction in HBV DNA, a ≥1 log10 reduction in HBV RNA, and a ≥0.3 log10 reduction in quantitative hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) from Baseline to Week 12.
Baseline to Week 12
Percentage of subjects with a ≥1 log10 reduction in HBV DNA, a ≥1 log10 reduction in HBV RNA, and a ≥0.5 log10 reduction in quantitative HBsAg
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 24
Percentage of subjects with a ≥1 log10 reduction in HBV DNA, a ≥1 log10 reduction in HBV RNA, and a ≥0.5 log10 reduction in quantitative hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) from Baseline to Week 24.
Baseline to Week 24

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from Baseline in serum levels of IFN-α, IFN-γ, TNF, IL-6, IL-10, and IP-10
Time Frame: Week 4
Fold change from Baseline in serum levels of IFN-α, IFN-γ, TNF, IL-6, IL-10, and IP-10 at Week 4
Week 4
Change from Baseline in serum levels of IFN-α, IFN-γ, TNF, IL-6, IL-10, and IP-10
Time Frame: Week 12
Fold change from Baseline in serum levels of IFN-α, IFN-γ, TNF, IL-6, IL-10, and IP-10 at Week 12
Week 12
Change from Baseline in serum levels of IFN-α, IFN-γ, TNF, IL-6, IL-10, and IP-10
Time Frame: Week 24
Fold change from Baseline in serum levels of IFN-α, IFN-γ, TNF, IL-6, IL-10, and IP-10 at Weeks 24
Week 24
Change from Baseline in serum levels of IFN-α, IFN-γ, TNF, IL-6, IL-10, and IP-10
Time Frame: Week 48
Fold change from Baseline in serum levels of IFN-α, IFN-γ, TNF, IL-6, IL-10, and IP-10 at Weeks 48
Week 48
Percentage of subjects who have a ≥0.5 log10 reduction in HBsAg
Time Frame: Week 12
Percentage of subjects who have a ≥0.5 log10 reduction in hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) at Week 12
Week 12
Percentage of subjects who have a ≥0.5 log10 reduction in HBsAg
Time Frame: Weeks 24
Percentage of subjects who have a ≥0.5 log10 reduction in hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) at Week 24
Weeks 24
Percentage of subjects with undetectable HBV DNA and HBV RNA
Time Frame: Week 24
Percentage of subjects with undetectable hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA and HBV RNA at Week 24
Week 24
Percentage of subjects with ≥1 log10 reduction in HBsAg
Time Frame: Week 24
Percentage of subjects with ≥1 log10 reduction in hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) at Week 24
Week 24
Percentage of subjects with undetectable HBV DNA and HBV RNA
Time Frame: Week 48
Percentage of subjects with undetectable hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA and HBV RNA at Week 48
Week 48
Percentage of subjects with normal ALT
Time Frame: Week 48
Percentage of subjects with normal alanine aminotransferase (ALT) at Week 48
Week 48
Percentage of Subjects who were HBeAg-positive at Baseline with loss of HBeAg
Time Frame: Week 24
Percentage of Subjects who were hepatitis B e-antigen (HBeAg)-positive at Baseline with loss of HBeAg at Week 24
Week 24
Percentage of Subjects who were HBeAg-positive at Baseline with loss of HBeAg
Time Frame: Week 48
Percentage of Subjects who were hepatitis B e-antigen (HBeAg)-positive at Baseline with loss of HBeAg at Week 48
Week 48
Percentage of Subjects who were HBeAg-positive at Baseline with > 0.5 log10 reduction in HBeAg
Time Frame: Week 12
Percentage of Subjects who were hepatitis B e-antigen (HBeAg)-positive at Baseline with > 0.5 log10 reduction in HBeAg at Week 12
Week 12
Percentage of Subjects who were HBeAg-positive at Baseline with > 0.5 log10 reduction in HBeAg
Time Frame: Week 24
Percentage of Subjects who were hepatitis B e-antigen (HBeAg)-positive at Baseline with > 0.5 log10 reduction in HBeAg at Week 24
Week 24
Percentage of Subjects who were HBeAg-positive at Baseline with > 0.5 log10 reduction in HBeAg
Time Frame: Week 48
Percentage of Subjects who were hepatitis B e-antigen (HBeAg)-positive at Baseline with > 0.5 log10 reduction in HBeAg at Week 48
Week 48
Percentage of Subjects who were HBeAg-positive at Baseline with > 1 log10 reduction in HBeAg
Time Frame: Week 12
Percentage of Subjects who were hepatitis B e-antigen (HBeAg)-positive at Baseline with > 1 log10 reduction in HBeAg at Week 12
Week 12
Percentage of Subjects who were HBeAg-positive at Baseline with > 1 log10 reduction in HBeAg
Time Frame: Week 24
Percentage of Subjects who were hepatitis B e-antigen (HBeAg)-positive at Baseline with > 1 log10 reduction in HBeAg at Week 24
Week 24
Percentage of Subjects who were HBeAg-positive at Baseline with > 1 log10 reduction in HBeAg
Time Frame: Week 48
Percentage of Subjects who were hepatitis B e-antigen (HBeAg)-positive at Baseline with > 1 log10 reduction in HBeAg at Week 48
Week 48
Percentage of Subjects who enter the Long-term Follow-up Period with undetectable HBV DNA and HBV RNA
Time Frame: Week 72
Percentage of Subjects who enter the Long-term Follow-up Period with undetectable heaptitis B virus (HBV) DNA and HBV RNA at Week 72
Week 72
Percentage of Subjects who enter the Long-term Follow-up Period who remain HBV DNA <2000 IU
Time Frame: Week 72
Percentage of Subjects who enter the Long-term Follow-up Period who remain hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA <2000 IU at Week 72
Week 72
Percentage of Subjects who enter the Long-term Follow-up Period with HBsAg loss
Time Frame: Week 72
Percentage of Subjects who enter the Long-term Follow-up Period with hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss at Week 72
Week 72
Percentage of Subjects who enter the Long-term Follow-up Period with normal ALT
Time Frame: Week 72
Percentage of Subjects who enter the Long-term Follow-up Period with normal alanine aminotransferase (ALT) at Week 72
Week 72
Percentage of Subjects who enter the Long-term Follow-up Period who were HBeAg-positive at Baseline with loss of HBeAg
Time Frame: Week 72
Percentage of Subjects who enter the Long-term Follow-up Period who were hepatitis B e-antigen (HBeAg)-positive at Baseline with loss of HBeAg at Week 72
Week 72

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Study Director: Don Mitchell, Spring Bank Pharmaceuticals

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

October 10, 2019

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

April 2, 2020

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

April 2, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 14, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 14, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

August 16, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

July 21, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 20, 2020

Last Verified

July 1, 2020

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hepatitis B

Clinical Trials on Inarigivir soproxil

Subscribe