FES to Improve Crouch Gait in CP (CP FES Walking)

Functional Electrical Stimulation to Improve Crouch Gait in Cerebral Palsy

The overall goal of the proposed work is to develop and to assess the feasibility of using functional electrical stimulation (FES) system to improve crouch gait in individuals with cerebral palsy that may prevent the typical downward spiral of walking function decline in individuals with CP that occurs from adolescence into adulthood.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Cerebral Palsy; Gait
• Intervention / Treatment: Device: Functional Electrical Stimulation.

Detailed Description

Aim 1: To assess the feasibility of using a multiple channel FES system to produce an immediate neuroprosthetic effect to reduce crouch gait in children and adolescents with spastic diplegic CP.

Aim 2: To assess the feasibility of using a multiple channel FES system as a therapeutic training tool to produce lasting neurotherapeutic effects of diminished crouch gait in children and adolescents with CP.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 13
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• United States
  • Pennsylvania
    • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19140
      • Shriners Hospitals for Children, Philadelphia

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 10 years to 18 years (Child, Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: Yes
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Age 10-18
• Spastic CP (di-, tetra-, or triplegia)
• Levels I-II GMFCS classification
• Sufficient covering of the femoral head in the acetabulum (migration % < 40)
• Mild crouch gait (minimum knee flexion 21-40o during stance)
• Potential to gain > 20 degrees knee extension improvement in stance phase
• Minimum of 0o ankle dorsiflexion passive range of motion (PROM)
• Visual, perceptual, cognitive, and communication skills to follow multiple step commands for attending to exercise and data collection
• Seizure-free or well controlled seizures

Exclusion Criteria:

• Athetoid, ataxic, or hemiplegic CP
• Significant scoliosis (primary curve > 40°)
• Spinal fusions extending into the pelvis
• Severe tactile hypersensitivity
• Joint instability or dislocation in lower extremity
• Lower extremity surgery or fractures in the past year
• Botox injections to Lower extremity in the past 6 months
• Implanted medical device contraindicated with application of FES
• Severe spasticity in Lower extremity (Mod Ashworth 4)
• Lower extremity joint pain during walking
• Hx of pulmonary disease limiting exercise tolerance or Hx of cardiac disease
• Severely limited range of motion / contractures (>15o knee flex or >15o hip flex contractures)
• Pregnancy

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Allocation: N/A
• Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
• Masking: None (Open Label)

Number of Arms

1

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Functional Electrical Stimulation protocol; Participants will be evaluated with and without the use of functional electrical stimulation while walking to determine the neuroprosthetic and neurotherapeutic effects.	Device: Functional Electrical Stimulation.; Functional electrical stimulation - electrical stimulation applied to a muscle during an activity (i.e. ankle dorsiflexors during swing phase of gait). It assists / elicits muscle activation in order to achieve a task.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Change in the Muscle Tone	We use the Modified Ashworth Scale to measure resistance to passive movement about a joint with varying degree of velocity (Muscle tone/spasticity). Score ranges from 0-4, with 6 choices where score of 0 means no increase in tone and score of 4 means rigid limb with no flexion or extension. Our training approach using repetitive electrical stimulation may also lower spasticity, which can also facilitate improved functional mobility.	Change from the baseline Modified Ashworth Scale at 14 weeks (post training)
Change in the Muscle Tone	We use the Modified Ashworth Scale to measure resistance to passive movement about a joint with varying degree of velocity (Muscle tone/spasticity). Score ranges from 0-4, with 6 choices where score of 0 means no increase in tone and score of 4 means rigid limb with no flexion or extension. Our training approach using repetitive electrical stimulation may also lower spasticity, which can also facilitate improved functional mobility.	Change from the baseline Modified Ashworth Scale at 27 weeks (Follow up)
Metabolic Cost of Walking	Walking Energy Expenditure will be measured via indirect calorimetry at the subject's self-selected walking speed. The subject will walk on the treadmill while breathing into a VMax gas-dilution SensorMedics metabolic measurement system. The subject will warm up at a slow walking speed for 3 minutes, walk for approximately 5 minutes at the subject's self-selected walking speed until steady state is reached, and then sit for a 3-minute cool down. The metabolic cost of walking is computed over the 5-minute walking period.	Change from the baseline Metabolic Cost of Walking at 14 weeks (post training)
Metabolic Cost of Walking	Walking Energy Expenditure will be measured via indirect calorimetry at the subject's self-selected walking speed. The subject will walk on the treadmill while breathing into a VMax gas-dilution SensorMedics metabolic measurement system. The subject will warm up at a slow walking speed for 3 minutes, walk for approximately 5 minutes at the subject's self-selected walking speed until steady state is reached, and then sit for a 3-minute cool down. The metabolic cost of walking is computed over the 5-minute walking period.	Change from the baseline Metabolic Cost of Walking at 27 weeks (Follow up)
Change in the Walking Speed	Walking Speed is measured via the 10-meter walk test. This time taken to complete the task is used to compute the average walking speed referred to as "self-selected" walking speed.	Change from the baseline Walking speed at 14 weeks (Post training)
Change in the Walking Speed	Walking Speed is measured via the 10-meter walk test. This time taken to complete the task is used to compute the average walking speed referred to as "self-selected" walking speed.	Change from the baseline Walking speed at 27 weeks (Follow up)
Change in the Walking Distance	Walking distance (in a fixed period of time) is an indicator of endurance. Walking Distance is measured via the 6-minute walk test. Improved motor learning and gait biomechanics from the training methods would improve gait efficiency and thus, endurance.	Change from the baseline Walking Distance at 14 weeks (Post training)
Change in the Walking Distance	Walking distance (in a fixed period of time) is an indicator of endurance. Walking Distance is measured via the 6-minute walk test. Improved motor learning and gait biomechanics from the training methods would improve gait efficiency and thus, endurance.	Change from the baseline Walking Distance at 27 weeks (Follow up)
Change in Gross Motor Function Measure	Gross Motor Function will be assessed via sections D and E of the Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM) test. This test is designed to evaluate changes in gross motor function over time of children with CP.	Change from the baseline GMFM score at 14 weeks (Post training)
Change in Gross Motor Function Measure	Gross Motor Function will be assessed via sections D and E of the Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM) test. This test is designed to evaluate changes in gross motor function over time of children with CP.	Change from the baseline GMFM score at 27 weeks (Follow up)
Change in the Timed Up-And-Go (TUG time)	Timed Up-And-Go (TUG) is a measure designed to assess functional mobility and balance. The subjects will be seated on an adjustable bench such that the knees and angles are at 90 degrees. Subjects will be timed as they rise, walk 3 meters, turn around, return to the bench and sit down again.assessing the impact of anticipated improvements in motor control and gait biomechanics.	Change from the baseline Time Up and Go time at 14 weeks (Post training)
Change in the Timed Up-And-Go (TUG time)	Timed Up-And-Go (TUG) is a measure designed to assess functional mobility and balance. The subjects will be seated on an adjustable bench such that the knees and angles are at 90 degrees. Subjects will be timed as they rise, walk 3 meters, turn around, return to the bench and sit down again.assessing the impact of anticipated improvements in motor control and gait biomechanics.	Change from the baseline Time Up and Go time at 27 weeks (Follow up)
Change in the Mini Balance Evaluation Systems Test Score	Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest) is a measure of balance function. The BESTest will allow for assessing the impact of anticipated improvements in motor control and gait biomechanics from training on balance. The test has a maximum score of 28 points and minimum score of zero. Score of 28 means highest level of function and 0 means lowest level of function.	Change from the baseline Mini BESTest score at 14 weeks (Post training)
Change in the Mini Balance Evaluation Systems Test Score	Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest) is a measure of balance function. The BESTest will allow for assessing the impact of anticipated improvements in motor control and gait biomechanics from training on balance. The test has a maximum score of 28 points and minimum score of zero. Score of 28 means highest level of function and 0 means lowest level of function.	Change from the baseline Mini BESTest score at 27 weeks (Follow up)
Change in the Electromyography	Muscle activation timing measured with Electromyography during gait analysis allows for mechanistic study of anticipated improvements in motor control and gait as well as comparison to typical norms.	Change from the baseline Muscle activation at 14 weeks (Post training)
Change in the Electromyography	Muscle activation timing measured with Electromyography during gait analysis allows for mechanistic study of anticipated improvements in motor control and gait as well as comparison to typical norms.	Change from the baseline Muscle activation at 27 weeks (Follow up)
Changes in the Activities-Specific Balance Scale Score	The Activities-Specific Balance Scale (ABC Scale) survey allows measurement of perceived functional mobility by assessing balance confidence to perform daily activities of living without falling. 16 items are rated on a rating scale with range of 0-100. Score of 0 means no confidence and 100 means complete confidence. Average score of 16 items is the overall score. Such measures will assess the impact of anticipated improvements in motor control and gait bio-mechanics from training.	Change from the baseline ABC scale score at 14 weeks (Post training)
Changes in the Activities-Specific Balance Scale Score	The Activities-Specific Balance Scale (ABC Scale) survey allows measurement of perceived functional mobility by assessing balance confidence to perform daily activities of living without falling. 16 items are rated on a rating scale with range of 0-100. Score of 0 means no confidence and 100 means complete confidence. Average score of 16 items is the overall score. Such measures will assess the impact of anticipated improvements in motor control and gait bio-mechanics from training.	Change from the baseline ABC scale score at 27 weeks (Follow up)
Changes in the Participation in Life Events survey score	Participation in life events (LIFE-H) survey measures how much a person is engaging or participating with their peers and community. Weighted score ranges between 0-10 with 0 score being no accomplishment and 10 means complete accomplishment. Such measures will assess the impact of anticipated improvements in motor control and gait biomechanics from training.	Change from the baseline LIFE-H scale score at 14 weeks (Post training)
Changes in the Participation in Life Events survey score	Participation in life events (LIFE-H) survey measures how much a person is engaging or participating with their peers and community. Weighted score ranges between 0-10 with 0 score being no accomplishment and 10 means complete accomplishment. Such measures will assess the impact of anticipated improvements in motor control and gait biomechanics from training.	Change from the baseline LIFE-H scale score at 27 weeks (Follow up)
Change in Piers-Harris Children's Self-Concept Scale score	Self-Perception will be measured via the Piers-Harris Children's Self-Concept Scale, Second Edition (Piers-Harris 2). This test is designed to measure self-concept as reported by the individual. It measures physical and emotional well-being and self-esteem and will allow assessment of the impact of anticipated improvements in motor control and gait biomechanics from training. The tool consists of 60 items that require the respondent to respond by circling "Yes" or "No." Raw scores are converted to standardized t-scores (mean = 50, standard deviation = 10) and percentile ranks. T-Score ranges for the total scale are: <29T is very low, 30T-39T is low, 40T-44T is low average, 45T-55T average, 56T-59T- is high average, 60T-69T is high and > 70T is very high. For the six subscales T-Score ranges < 29T is very low, 30T-39T is low, 40T-44T is low average, 45T-55T is average and > 56T is above average.	Change from the baseline Piers-Harris Children's Self-Concept scale score at 14 weeks (Post training)
Change in Piers-Harris Children's Self-Concept Scale score	Self-Perception will be measured via the Piers-Harris Children's Self-Concept Scale, Second Edition (Piers-Harris 2). This test is designed to measure self-concept as reported by the individual. It measures physical and emotional well-being and self-esteem and will allow assessment of the impact of anticipated improvements in motor control and gait biomechanics from training. The tool consists of 60 items that require the respondent to respond by circling "Yes" or "No." Raw scores are converted to standardized t-scores (mean = 50, standard deviation = 10) and percentile ranks. T-Score ranges for the total scale are: <29T is very low, 30T-39T is low, 40T-44T is low average, 45T-55T average, 56T-59T- is high average, 60T-69T is high and > 70T is very high. For the six subscales T-Score ranges < 29T is very low, 30T-39T is low, 40T-44T is low average, 45T-55T is average and > 56T is above average.	Change from the baseline Piers-Harris Children's Self-Concept scale score at 27 weeks (Follow up)
Change in Joint angles	Hip, Knee and Ankle Joint Angles (Kinematic data) are measured using Instrumented gait analysis (Motion capture analysis system) during seven different gait phases.	Change from the baseline Joint angles at 14 weeks (Post training)
Change in Joint angles	Hip, Knee and Ankle Joint Angles (Kinematic data) are measured using Instrumented gait analysis (Motion capture analysis system) during seven different gait phases.	Change from the baseline joint angles at 27 weeks (Follow up)

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Shriners Hospitals for Children
• Investigators: Principal Investigator: Samuel Lee, PT, PhD, Shriners Hospital for Children & University of Delaware

Publications and helpful links

Helpful Links

• Dr. Lee's current research studies

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start: January 1, 2012
• Primary Completion (Actual): December 1, 2016
• Study Completion (Actual): December 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: December 12, 2019
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: December 19, 2019
• First Posted (Actual): December 24, 2019

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): December 30, 2019
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: December 26, 2019
• Last Verified: December 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: Cerebral Palsy; Functional electrical stimulation; Neurotherapeutic
• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Brain Diseases; Central Nervous System Diseases; Nervous System Diseases; Brain Damage, Chronic; Cerebral Palsy
• Other Study ID Numbers: 71011-PHI

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: YES

IPD Plan Description

The proposed experiments will generate data for publications in high quality peer reviewed journals. We will also present our findings at national meetings of neurorehabilitation scientists and clinicians and neuroscience and motor control meetings. To have the most impact, it is important that we present our findings to both clinicians and scientists, therefore, in addition to these standard approaches, we will seek out regular opportunities to present both the rationale and results of our work to local and regional clinicians as well as local and regional stroke support groups.

Once the primary hypotheses of the current proposal are tested, all data will be de-identified and be deposited in the DASH (The Data and Specimen Hub) repository.

• IPD Sharing Time Frame: Study protocol and data will be shared on publication of primary results
• IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type: STUDY_PROTOCOL; CSR