- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06421753
Efficiency of Spatially Distributed Sequential Stimulation (Sdss) for Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) of Upper Motor Neuron Syndrome (UMR) Patients (SDSS_UMS)
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Design: SCED (single case experimental design) prospective, monocentric, comparative interventional study (SDSS versus SES) Population: patients with motor deficit due to upper motor neuron syndrome Setting: Neurologic Rehabilitation Unit Interventions: 3 FES cycling sessions separated by 48h of rest. Each session is comprised of 2 phases separated by 20 minutes of rest. Each phase is comprised of a 3 minutes passive cycling warm-up, followed by 3 minutes of electrically stimulated cycling.
Participants will be evaluated before and during the training.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: julie di marco, MD
- Phone Number: 01133472532161
- Email: dr.jdimarco@gmail.com
Study Contact Backup
- Name: sarah finel
- Email: secmedhdj.valrosay@ugecam.assurance-maladie.fr
Study Locations
-
-
-
Saint didier au mont d'or, France, 69370
- Recruiting
- SMR Val Rosay
-
Principal Investigator:
- julie di marco, MD
-
Contact:
- julie di marco, MD
- Phone Number: 01133472532161
- Email: dr.jdimarco@gmail.com
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients with Upper Motor Neuron syndrome:
- adult (> 18 years)
- motor deficit due to an acquired traumatic or neurodegenerative motor deficiency of the central nervous system (MRC<4/5)
- stable clinical condition, particularly on the cardiovascular level (recent assessment by a cardiologist with stress test)
- non denervated muscles
- tolerant to muscle electrical stimulation
- having given written consent
- able to cycle 30 minutes with FES-cycling
Exclusion Criteria:
- major cognitive comprehension disorders that could compromise understanding of the protocol and the smooth running of the study
- cardiac pacemaker and other contraindications relating to the use of electrostimulation (in particularly "deep vein thrombosis")
- spasticity of the lower limbs making flexion/extension movement difficult
- participation in another study
- pregnancy
- people with the following legal and administrative states or situations:
- people placed under judicial protection;
- persons deprived of their liberty, persons subject to psychiatric care and persons admitted to a health or social establishment for purposes other than that of clinical investigation;
- unemancipated minors;
- people who are not affiliated to a social security scheme or beneficiaries of such a scheme
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Spatially Distributed Sequential Functional Electrical Stimulation
Interventions: 3 FES cycling sessions separated by 48h of rest.
Each session is comprised of 2 phases separated by 20 minutes of rest.
Each phase is comprised of a 3 minutes passive cycling warm-up, followed by 3 minutes of electrically stimulated cycling.
|
Each session begins with a 3-minute warm-up phase, followed by a 3-minute stimulation phase.
The motor rotates the legs at 50 rpm during both phases.
The type of stimulation used in the first phase is chosen randomly.
After a 20-minute break, the second warm-up and stimulation phases are carried out During the second session, the order of the stimulation phases is reversed.
|
Active Comparator: Standard Electrical Stimulation During Functional Electrical Stimulation
Each session begins with a 3-minute warm-up phase, followed by a 3-minute stimulation phase.
The motor rotates the legs at 50 rpm during both phases.
The type of stimulation used in the first phase is chosen randomly.
After a 20-minute break, the second warm-up and stimulation phases are carried out.
During the second session, the order of the stimulation phases is reversed.
|
Each session begins with a 3-minute warm-up phase, followed by a 3-minute stimulation phase.
The motor rotates the legs at 50 rpm during both phases.
The type of stimulation used in the first phase is chosen randomly.
After a 20-minute break, the second warm-up and stimulation phases are carried out During the second session, the order of the stimulation phases is reversed.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Average quadriceps power output (watts) measured during 3 minutes of FES cycling
Time Frame: during sessions of FES cycling
|
The subjects are installed on a Hepha Bike electrostimulation bike, equipped with force-torque measuring pedals (ICS_RM, Sensix, France), synchronized with a MotiMove-8 stimulator.
The average quadriceps power (watts) during the first and last 30 seconds of each stimulation phase, as well as the total average power (Pm) are calculated.
|
during sessions of FES cycling
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Evaluate the comfort of dry and hydrogel based functional electrical stimulation electrodes
Time Frame: before the first session of FES cycling
|
Dry electrode then hydrogel electrode are placed on the quadriceps' motor point The amplitude of stimulation is increased in steps of 3 mA followed by 5 seconds of rest for subsequent trains until the subject feels a burning sensation.
the stimulation threshold (mA) is compared between dry and hydrogel electrode
|
before the first session of FES cycling
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2024-01-VR
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Upper Motor Neuron Disease
-
Hospital for Special Surgery, New YorkActive, not recruiting
-
Bioness NeuromodulationLoewenstein Hospital; Bioness IncUnknownMuscle Weakness | Motor Neuron Disease, Upper | Drop FootIsrael
-
Bioness IncBioness NeuromodulationCompletedFoot Drop | Thigh Muscles Weakness (Hamstrings or Quadriceps) | Upper Motor Neuron Injury or DiseaseIsrael
-
Halic UniversityCompletedMultiple Sclerosis | Mindfulness | Upper Motor Neuron LesionTurkey
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisNot yet recruitingProgressive Motor Neuron Disease Without Definite Diagnosis
-
University of EdinburghUniversity College, London; NHS Lothian; University of WarwickRecruitingMotor Neuron Disease, Amyotrophic Lateral SclerosisUnited Kingdom
-
Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustNot yet recruitingMotor Neuron Disease, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
-
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and...Completed
-
Bioinova, s.r.o.Department of Neurology, University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech RepublicCompletedMotor Neuron Disease, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
-
Washington University School of MedicineEnrolling by invitationMotor Neuron Disease | Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis | Lou Gehrig Disease | Familial Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis | Motor Neuron Disease, FamilialUnited States