- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04304976
Clinical Trial ROBERT® - Project Active Training
February 18, 2021 updated by: Lifescience-Robotics
The overall purpose with this clinical trial is to, monitor and secure ROBERT®'s clinical performance and safety in a clinical environment in the regional hospital North Denmark, Neuro Unit North.
The purpose of the study is to investigate if ROBERT® has the ability to 1. Perform guided active training.
2. Perform resistance based active training.
And validate the safety of ROBERT® in a clinical environment.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
8
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Nordjylland
-
Frederikshavn, Nordjylland, Denmark, 9900
- Region Hospital, Neuro Unit Nord.
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Hospitalised patients at Neuro Unit North, during the trial period.
- 18 years or older.
- Can read, understand and speak Danish
- Reduced motor function in lower extremities.
Exclusion Criteria:
- No able to sign informed consent.
- Cannot read, understand or speak Danish
- Patients with unstable fractures in columna, pelvis or lower extremities.
- Patients with the risk of ulcers, or with exceedingly sensitive skin.
- The patient is refusing to train with ROBERT®
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Device Feasibility
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Training with ROBERT® Passive
Training performed with ROBERT® in passive mode, resulting in active assistive training.
|
Robotic Rehabilitation intervention ROBERT®, designed for early, and supplementary therapy of patients.
|
Experimental: Training with ROBERT® Active
Traning performed with ROBERT® in Active mode, resulting in active resistive training.
|
Robotic Rehabilitation intervention ROBERT®, designed for early, and supplementary therapy of patients.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Active training and assistive training capabilities (3 active and 3 passive motions): evaluated as passed/not passed
Time Frame: Up to 19 weeks
|
|
Up to 19 weeks
|
Safety, Capture adverse events.
Time Frame: Up to 19 weeks
|
Safety is evaluated during patient use, nr of treatment-related adverse events is recorded during training sessions.
|
Up to 19 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Helle Rovsing Jørgensen, Therapist, Neuro Unit Nord, Denmark
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Lang CE, Lohse KR, Birkenmeier RL. Dose and timing in neurorehabilitation: prescribing motor therapy after stroke. Curr Opin Neurol. 2015 Dec;28(6):549-55. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000000256.
- Needham DM, Davidson J, Cohen H, Hopkins RO, Weinert C, Wunsch H, Zawistowski C, Bemis-Dougherty A, Berney SC, Bienvenu OJ, Brady SL, Brodsky MB, Denehy L, Elliott D, Flatley C, Harabin AL, Jones C, Louis D, Meltzer W, Muldoon SR, Palmer JB, Perme C, Robinson M, Schmidt DM, Scruth E, Spill GR, Storey CP, Render M, Votto J, Harvey MA. Improving long-term outcomes after discharge from intensive care unit: report from a stakeholders' conference. Crit Care Med. 2012 Feb;40(2):502-9. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318232da75.
- Langhorne P, Coupar F, Pollock A. Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Lancet Neurol. 2009 Aug;8(8):741-54. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70150-4.
- Wist S, Clivaz J, Sattelmayer M. Muscle strengthening for hemiparesis after stroke: A meta-analysis. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2016 Apr;59(2):114-24. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2016.02.001. Epub 2016 Mar 8.
- Peiris CL, Taylor NF, Shields N. Extra physical therapy reduces patient length of stay and improves functional outcomes and quality of life in people with acute or subacute conditions: a systematic review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 Sep;92(9):1490-500. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.04.005.
- Lohse KR, Lang CE, Boyd LA. Is more better? Using metadata to explore dose-response relationships in stroke rehabilitation. Stroke. 2014 Jul;45(7):2053-8. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.004695. Epub 2014 May 27.
- Wunsch H, Guerra C, Barnato AE, Angus DC, Li G, Linde-Zwirble WT. Three-year outcomes for Medicare beneficiaries who survive intensive care. JAMA. 2010 Mar 3;303(9):849-56. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.216.
- I. Com, Global strategy and action plan on ageing and health. 2017.
- "NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS public health challenges WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data," 2006.
- English C, Bernhardt J, Crotty M, Esterman A, Segal L, Hillier S. Circuit class therapy or seven-day week therapy for increasing rehabilitation intensity of therapy after stroke (CIRCIT): a randomized controlled trial. Int J Stroke. 2015 Jun;10(4):594-602. doi: 10.1111/ijs.12470. Epub 2015 Mar 19.
- Sarkies MN, White J, Henderson K, Haas R, Bowles J; Evidence Translation in Allied Health (EviTAH) Group. Additional weekend allied health services reduce length of stay in subacute rehabilitation wards but their effectiveness and cost-effectiveness are unclear in acute general medical and surgical hospital wards: a systematic review. J Physiother. 2018 Jul;64(3):142-158. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2018.05.004. Epub 2018 Jun 19.
- Peiris CL, Shields N, Brusco NK, Watts JJ, Taylor NF. Additional Physical Therapy Services Reduce Length of Stay and Improve Health Outcomes in People With Acute and Subacute Conditions: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Nov;99(11):2299-2312. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.03.005. Epub 2018 Apr 7.
- "Ét sikkert og sammenhaengende sundhedsnetvaerk for alle."
- Masiero S, Poli P, Rosati G, Zanotto D, Iosa M, Paolucci S, Morone G. The value of robotic systems in stroke rehabilitation. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2014 Mar;11(2):187-98. doi: 10.1586/17434440.2014.882766. Epub 2014 Jan 30.
- Semprini M, Laffranchi M, Sanguineti V, Avanzino L, De Icco R, De Michieli L, Chiappalone M. Technological Approaches for Neurorehabilitation: From Robotic Devices to Brain Stimulation and Beyond. Front Neurol. 2018 Apr 9;9:212. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00212. eCollection 2018.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
November 27, 2019
Primary Completion (Actual)
January 16, 2020
Study Completion (Actual)
April 21, 2020
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
February 26, 2020
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 11, 2020
First Posted (Actual)
March 12, 2020
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
February 21, 2021
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
February 18, 2021
Last Verified
March 1, 2020
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- N-20190038
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Spinal Cord Injuries
-
Khon Kaen UniversityUnknownInjuries, Spinal Cord
-
Universidade do Vale do ParaíbaCompletedInjuries, Spinal Cord
-
InVivo TherapeuticsTerminated
-
Ekso BionicsBurke Medical Research InstituteCompletedInjuries, Spinal CordUnited States
-
ReWalk Robotics, Inc.Unknown
-
Shepherd Center, Atlanta GACompletedInjuries, Spinal Cord
-
Wroclaw Medical UniversityInstitute of Immunology and Experimental Therapy of the Polish Academy of... and other collaboratorsUnknownComplete Spinal Cord InjuriesPoland
-
M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterActive, not recruitingMetastatic Epidural Spinal Cord CompressionUnited States
Clinical Trials on ROBERT®
-
Spinal Cord Injury Centre of Western DenmarkSvend Andersen FondenActive, not recruitingSpinal Cord InjuriesDenmark
-
Riphah International UniversityCompleted
-
Mahidol UniversityCompletedPostoperative Blood LossThailand
-
University of DuhokCompletedChildren, Only | Fracture Distal RadiusIraq
-
Chong Kun Dang PharmaceuticalCompleted
-
Dong-A ST Co., Ltd.CompletedFunctional DyspepsiaKorea, Republic of
-
Galderma R&DCompletedAtopic DermatitisPhilippines, China
-
Sanofi Pasteur, a Sanofi CompanyCompletedPertussis | Diphtheria | PolioUnited States
-
Chung-Ang University Hosptial, Chung-Ang University...UnknownFunctional DyspepsiaKorea, Republic of